But he's nonetheless an ex-boyfriend. So maybe:
- Luci's just mistaken here
- Luci's lying here
- Luci wasn't speaking in absolutes
Yes, I'm making assumptions--I think they're reasonable ones given what we're told; you seem to disagree. OTOH, you're taking Luci's statements as absolute fact, and I don't believe there's any reason to do that--indeed, I think there's good reason not to. To use the example I just quoted from you, if Luci is to believed as an absolute statement, Kali at at least one point had a boyfriend with whom she never went on a date. That just doesn't make any sense. So is there a way to understand this that does make sense? Yes, there is--it's that Luci was speaking
generally, not
absolutely.
By Kali's account, she and Luci hadn't been close for some time. That further suggests that Luci's knowledge and/or understanding of Kali's social life may be incorrect and/or incomplete.
So when you combine
- Luci is known to be wrong about Kali's being a virgin
- Luci is likely speaking generally, not absolutely, about Kali's dating habits
- Luci and Kali haven't been all that close for the past few years, so Luci may not know as much as she thinks she knows about Kali's social life
I think my assumptions make a lot of sense, and they're consistent with what Luci's saying.
Could Runey have done a better job with Kali's back story? I agree he could have. But I don't think it's as contradictory as you're making out.