This is uh... a joke, right? If it's not... whew...
I mean, it's fine to have an emotional response. It's slightly less fine to judge things strictly based on what they look like, without having any idea what they actually are. But try not to combine the two. That's just... embarrassing.
Agreed 100% with Nobby, Venator309, popober, RanceH2O -
<sigh> and I had just expressed in this other post how gratified I was that f95zoners had the capability to separate fantasy from reality:
https://f95zone.to/threads/perverted-education-v0-801-april-ryan.1854/post-1642412
I can understand normal people not equating firing a gun with 'firing your gun' and for it to be a turn-off,
(it doesn't do much for me, admittedly - they could have replaced it with a dildo firing 'love energy' and it would have worked...)
but it is just as disingenuous to overthink this as equating gun violence with sexual gratification,
as it is to call a game about creating a harem by shooting a gun as being in any way 'realistic'.
Essentially, for users on these forums to claim that it is dangerous to have games like this, only lends speculative 'ammunition' to interest groups seeking to demonise and ban games depicting even the most abstracted 'violent' iconography as causative of mental disorders and violence,
rather than the reverse being true.
i.e. those with a cognitive impairment and inability to separate fantasy from reality, and those with a propensity to violence through sociopathy, prior trauma and/or PTSD are more likely to be drawn to violent iconography.
This doesn't just apply to violence - the same is true for various 'taboo' iconography and depictions in games, as with the numerous interest groups attempting to ban and criminalise such artistic depictions.