So you've only played 3-4 games on here?One of the best games on F95 imo, only i-patch missing.
So you've only played 3-4 games on here?One of the best games on F95 imo, only i-patch missing.
No it's not.This place is known for not giving negative feedback here. If you bark at dev's then it will be removed immediately. That is, a fucking corrupt place. Reviews don’t tell the whole truth when there are only those ass licking reviews left.
That would be difficult because the game will be abandoned by 2024hmm almost 1 year but still 0.02
see u guys in 2030 when this game is completed
Silk is a conundrum. Very good renders, decent story, excellent production valueSO I was going to test the game until I saw all the dev talking about is demanding more money Make a good game and you'll make more money. It's bad practice and distastful to be on the 2nd release and demand money out of people. I know devs that have been working on games since 2017 and still making less than $100 but still contiue to put out their game in a timely manor.
Reviews are not an accurate reflection of a game at all. People dish out 5 star reviews for 2 minute demos like they're getting paid to do it. "No content yet but pretty woman and haz potential 5 stars durrrrr." Everything here is overrated because of this and yes, bad reviews are frequently deleted. And things like update frequency are extremely relevant and should definitely be considered.No it's not.
The review is supposed to just about the game and not about anything that the dev does, the frequency of his releases etc.
So hate the game, give it a bad rating sure, but for all the hate that S&M get, their games (The part that's done) are undoubtedly very good.
I actually don't even know how good this one is, as I only played their first game and that was by all measurable indexes a very good game until it got abandoned.
I'm not fans of the dev myself. I think what they did was very dumb and stupid. But the reason why everyone is complaining is precisely because it's such a great game with great potential.
If the game was awful, people will just leave a bad review and no one will start playing the game and the thread will only have like 10 pages.
People don't understand how averages work or how to make a review, most 5 stars I see end up looking like this.Reviews are not an accurate reflection of a game at all. People dish out 5 star reviews for 2 minute demos like they're getting paid to do it. "No content yet but pretty woman and haz potential 5 stars durrrrr." Everything here is overrated because of this and yes, bad reviews are frequently deleted. And things like update frequency are extremely relevant and should definitely be considered.
After every drama unfolds, every comment that isn't pure dickriding gets deleted. Devs and/or their waterboys make a big stink, talk shit about this site and its dirty pirates as though they don't rely on the free exposure, act like they're being persecuted somehow because they can't handle feedback, call in the mods and eventually get their way. Being a member since 2017 it would be really strange if you hadn't seen this happen dozens of times. I'm surprised this thread hasn't been purged yet honestly.
It doesn't even make much sense. When you think about it for just 3 seconds, "This game is great!" and "This game sucks!" are the exact same comment. Both equally on topic because they're thoughts on a game, both include the same amount of detail. But one gets deleted, while the other one doesn't. For no reason other than bias. Bias towards the perceived authority figure, developers, even though they have absolutely no authority. Bias towards "nice" comments instead of honest ones.
I'm sorry, the mods must have done a pretty shitty job on this review thread.Reviews are not an accurate reflection of a game at all. People dish out 5 star reviews for 2 minute demos like they're getting paid to do it. "No content yet but pretty woman and haz potential 5 stars durrrrr." Everything here is overrated because of this and yes, bad reviews are frequently deleted. And things like update frequency are extremely relevant and should definitely be considered.
After every drama unfolds, every comment that isn't pure dickriding gets deleted. Devs and/or their waterboys make a big stink, talk shit about this site and its dirty pirates as though they don't rely on the free exposure, act like they're being persecuted somehow because they can't handle feedback, call in the mods and eventually get their way. Being a member since 2017 it would be really strange if you hadn't seen this happen dozens of times. I'm surprised this thread hasn't been purged yet honestly.
It doesn't even make much sense. When you think about it for just 3 seconds, "This game is great!" and "This game sucks!" are the exact same comment. Both equally on topic because they're thoughts on a game, both include the same amount of detail. But one gets deleted, while the other one doesn't. For no reason other than bias. Bias towards the perceived authority figure, developers, even though they have absolutely no authority. Bias towards "nice" comments instead of honest ones.
Whoever wrote thatPeople don't understand how averages work or how to make a review, most 5 stars I see end up looking like this.
*Pros
-Grafix best ever
*Cons
- Dad alive bad
- No music
- MC PP too big, make me insecure
- Game wont run on Windows ME
- Grafix worst ever
*Conclusion 5 Stars Max Tier Patreon subscriber 4 lyfe
Mods seem to follow only one rule, i.e good publicity is the only publicity.I'm sorry, the mods must have done a pretty shitty job on this review thread.
They let slip through 5x1 star reviews and 4x2star just on the last page. They sure seems to be deleting those 1 star reviews fast!!
Personally I think you are wrong. People on IMDB and pretty much any rating site ever gives full marks for average and just above average products all the time. The same thing on this site.
I do find ratings very useful. I do not like all 4-5 star games on here, but a below 3 star game are bound to be a bundle of shit.
Look, I've had 1 or 2 of my reviews deleted in the past. The rules are pretty clear and attacking the dev in your review is against the rules.Mods seem to follow only one rule, i.e good publicity is the only publicity.
And let's be honest there are no strong reason for them to delete those 4+ ratings how much ever silly they can be unless the account that rated isn't created specifically for the exact reason, spam. But, But
Why they delete 1/2+ rated reviews are beyond me if they are genuine. Victims of such treatment are those which contrast with other popular reviews, mostly. Or when mass reported.
I got first hand experience with my reviews getting deleted for more absurd and totally unrelated reason. So you might need to what they say "broaden your horizon". If you want to see "how anyone can say the mods deleted them" first step should be to stop considering them as always honest cop.Look, I've had 1 or 2 of my reviews deleted in the past. The rules are pretty clear and attacking the dev in your review is against the rules.
In this instance There are plenty 1 and 2 star reviews, so I can not see how anyone can say the mods delete them.
Lot's of times, people just don't like a game, and then can not understand why the game is rated 4+. I'm not saying that everything is always 100% above board. But I will say if a game has 4+ stars it's normally decent. less then 3 it's normally shit.
That does not mean that everyone will love all 4+ star games. That's what the tags are for. Personally I don't have issues with the review section. It's not perfect, but it's better then not being there. I read lot's of reviews before starting to play a game. You can "spot" the fakes a mile away and just ignore them.
What are your preferred games ?I will be honest here, I don't much care about 99% of the games on this website. There are only 3-4 games that I look forward to and unfortunately, this is not one of them. I know the characters are well made and I am aware of the hype around the storytelling talent of the dev. The only character I care about is Katrina and by the looks of it, we won't even see her for many years to come. I don't want to criticise the dev but I have seen his past project abandoned for whatever reasons. I have low hopes for this game which in my opinion is inferior to his previous game. I sincerely hope that this game works out for him and he gets the support that he desires, but a 6-month update cycle for a 15-minute update is simply not a feasible plan. There are many games devs with a lower number of patreons and higher game quality present now so this kind of attitude has a difficult time surviving.