If the MC is the only sexually active male or the only male period then Swinging/Sharing really isn't necessary as a tagI appreciate your insight. My biggest gripe would be that the tag for NTR is too broad. swinging is more correct. games like what's mine is yours, WVM, and Sharing is caring with the netori routes/ reverse NTR aren't classified under the NTR tag. cuckquean where the MC is male is broad tagwise, though if the MC was female then it would be. I feel like 9 times outta 10 that NTR and swinging would get blacklisted, but cheating (which reverse NTR falls under) is fine.
That being said. Leaning into the audiance may occur. The disclaimer is purely for the Netorare tag that we have on this site. netori/reverse NTR WILL be there, but there is a route that I am unsure would fit into the lore that I may kill. I agree with you that I am making this for an audiance, so i should prob let the audiance decide (like a poll or something later on).
I'm gonna have to think about this some more. I seriously thank you for your insight.
You can disable lesbian content at the start of the game. But if you choose first pure option and corrupt second, game forgets that you select no lesbian option, and show you girlxrgirl action. So variables little broken. If you choose only pure (with lesbian off), you not gonna see any girlxgirl scenes right now.Does this still have forced lesbian on the pure path? Thought I'd ask before wasting time on it. Thank you
Ya know normally I'd agree with this but from talking with the dev I'm pretty sure the only actual change is offering a female option for a trap character. The swinging content was never actually swinging content, it was just mis-tagged. The pure path was always going to be an actual pure path, it just didn't exist last update and that confused people into thinking there was lesbianism in the pure path. Like ya there's definitely some tag whiners here but as far as I'm aware there's only one real change being made from them and the original version of that is still going to exist, just as an option.Gotta be honest, not liking the comments in this thread with regards to having hope for this game, the usual tag whiners are everywhere, one wants X and Y but not Z, the next wants Y and Z but not X and then next wants X and Z but not Y and the dev is bending over backwards so far they could lick their own asshole... only game's that are ever worth playing come from devs who have a vision of what they want to make before they put pen to paper and only accept community input for minor things or relatively simplistic ideas they hadn't thought of themselves. There's always going to be people who dislike a dev's choices, but if you give them an opening they will force their way in as hard and far as they can. It doesn't matter what the content is, what tag it falls under, there's a vocal minority for anything and everything and they're very used to getting their way if they screech loudly and long enough. Save yourself the trouble, for every one you appease another will soon follow suit with a new demand/complaint/'suggestion'.
Well, i certainly hope you're right MBS, this one is still in my 'too new' folder for now and i guess since we usually see eye to eye most of the time then you've given me some degree of renewed hope for this one.Ya know normally I'd agree with this but from talking with the dev I'm pretty sure the only actual change is offering a female option for a trap character. The swinging content was never actually swinging content, it was just mis-tagged. The pure path was always going to be an actual pure path, it just didn't exist last update and that confused people into thinking there was lesbianism in the pure path. Like ya there's definitely some tag whiners here but as far as I'm aware there's only one real change being made from them and the original version of that is still going to exist, just as an option.
Completely agree. Having a vision and story outline before you release something is important for more than just AVNs. However, given the volatility that people's opinions affect this particular brand of entertainment it is even more important. I think devs should listen to constructive criticism, for sure. That shouldn't change their overall vision drastically, though.Gotta be honest, not liking the comments in this thread with regards to having hope for this game, the usual tag whiners are everywhere, one wants X and Y but not Z, the next wants Y and Z but not X and then next wants X and Z but not Y and the dev is bending over backwards so far they could lick their own asshole... only game's that are ever worth playing come from devs who have a vision of what they want to make before they put pen to paper and only accept community input for minor things or relatively simplistic ideas they hadn't thought of themselves. There's always going to be people who dislike a dev's choices, but if you give them an opening they will force their way in as hard and far as they can. It doesn't matter what the content is, what tag it falls under, there's a vocal minority for anything and everything and they're very used to getting their way if they screech loudly and long enough. Save yourself the trouble, for every one you appease another will soon follow suit with a new demand/complaint/'suggestion'.
Gotta be honest, not liking the comments in this thread with regards to having hope for this game, the usual tag whiners are everywhere, one wants X and Y but not Z, the next wants Y and Z but not X and then next wants X and Z but not Y and the dev is bending over backwards so far they could lick their own asshole... only game's that are ever worth playing come from devs who have a vision of what they want to make before they put pen to paper and only accept community input for minor things or relatively simplistic ideas they hadn't thought of themselves. There's always going to be people who dislike a dev's choices, but if you give them an opening they will force their way in as hard and far as they can. It doesn't matter what the content is, what tag it falls under, there's a vocal minority for anything and everything and they're very used to getting their way if they screech loudly and long enough. Save yourself the trouble, for every one you appease another will soon follow suit with a new demand/complaint/'suggestion'.
good job telling people you got no idea what you talking about without telling people adding more options means more variables,code, along with animation and writing which adds more work and takes time away from other things.Devs can make any content they want and still put choices in. It's not hard to add a choice to avoid content. And adding a choice doesn't mean they are leaving content out
I always think it's a good idea for a dev to be open to constructive criticism but i think it's all too common for folks to think their particular preferences fall under that banner when it's just entirely subjective. For example, a common one, and the one i saw the most of flicking through the last 2 pages of comments, is this idea of optional content. It sounds perfectly reasonable but it leads to an issue down the line, if content can be skipped then it either has to be isolated from the overarching story so as to not cause continuity issues, OR the dev has to incorporate an ever increasing web of checks and alternate paths for the choices each player makes and keep the story from falling apart with holes and inconsistencies.I very much dig your comment here man like taking some advice or whatever never hurts but sometimes they folks making they games gotta stick to what they want. I feel like this is why so many games get abandon or just go milking mode the vision gets lost very quickly and all you have is a bunch of super entitled people you let in and sets you to burn out mode
good job telling people you got no idea what you talking about without telling people adding more options means more variables,code, along with animation and writing which adds more work and takes time away from other things.