I think that maybe you went just a little bit overboard there. He NEVER said that he wished that you don't get to have her as a love interest. merely that he would be happy if she weren't a love interest. Not nearly the same thing.
Either you have language issues (unlikely), or you blew a fuse at what you thought you read. I recommend a delay before posting such a vitriolic message.
PS. I, too, would be happy if Emma weren't a love interest, but since the dev has decided to make her one, I will be sure to reject her if she wants one with me.
I will post a screen cap so you cannot say I edited anything:
So if you can read the English words above the red lines:
"we don't get to pursue"
So if you can comprehend those words you know they mean "don't get" so yes he did in fact say "don't get"
He did NOT say I don't want (which is expressing his desire for himself, for his own feelings)
He said "WE" which collectively includes all of us players -- not himself and some mouse hiding in his pocket.
And then said "don't get" which is not his exclusive desire for his own choices but more of total collective inability. So he wants the game to NOT allow a path rather than just not take it himself. And that is nonsense. Hence my asking "What sense does that make?" You have your own ability to never get romantic with Emma and never see her as an adult so why bring, "would be happy" to see something locked away from others, into it. Was it misunderstanding the words he utilized? Or was it just deciding that what he does not like should not exist in a game? (If it was the latter, due to the repeated echoes in here from ancient, dried up fossils shitting themselves about how it is wrong and creepy and where did I put my false teeth, I am so sick of it that I iterated my thoughts on what anyone could do with those sentiments)
So I did not misread or misunderstand the sentence but I allow that he may have.
PEACE
