Wow, the animations belong in a horror movie.
is the lesbian avoidable in this even if its during groupsex?
I encountered no lesbian scenes, but depending on your choices, I'm sure it would play out differently. For what it's worth, I only liked Amber.
Or because they look like shit. It's a mystery.I always find it rather curious to read the criticism aimed at AI-generated animations. Until just a few months ago, it was unthinkable for us developers to produce quality animations without facing endless production times. Today, however, it’s possible to create scenes lasting several minutes with relatively little effort.
And, in many cases, the quality is even superior to that of animations made in Daz Studio.
So why all the objections? Because they aren’t “real”? Because AI supposedly takes work away from artists? Or perhaps simply because criticizing anything made with AI has become a trendy attitude?
Ah I see u rejected sex with the two police women,but u get nothing if u do it (I didn’t play last update).I encountered no lesbian scenes, but depending on your choices, I'm sure it would play out differently. For what it's worth, I only liked Amber.
Interesting start.
If they look like that to you, fair enough. Tastes differ.Or because they look like shit. It's a mystery.
Hi, I apologize for my ignorance, but what does NSFW mean?
As a developer myself, though not one that focuses on creating renders/visual effects (so feel free to strike that against me), I personally don't look at it as bubbly as you do.I always find it rather curious to read the criticism aimed at AI-generated animations. Until just a few months ago, it was unthinkable for us developers to produce quality animations without facing endless production times. Today, however, it’s possible to create scenes lasting several minutes with relatively little effort.
And, in many cases, the quality is even superior to that of animations made in Daz Studio.
So why all the objections? Because they aren’t “real”? Because AI supposedly takes work away from artists? Or perhaps simply because criticizing anything made with AI has become a trendy attitude?
You say "stiff, awkward Daz animations" I call it learning. You need to make decisions to learn. AI cookie cuts everything into an amalgamation of thousands of artists work into one in a worst case scenario. In the case specifically of animation, it smudges made up life into your renders. Working hard to figure out the kinks in a process is the most rewarding part. I'm not saying AI can't help to eliminate mundane tasks in the future, but to let an AI CREATE for you, is where I draw the line.If they look like that to you, fair enough. Tastes differ.
What I find curious is that people rarely criticize the years of stiff, awkward Daz animations with the same intensity.
Yeah I'll be honest, I was expecting a lot ofI always find it rather curious to read the criticism aimed at AI-generated animations. Until just a few months ago, it was unthinkable for us developers to produce quality animations without facing endless production times. Today, however, it’s possible to create scenes lasting several minutes with relatively little effort.
And, in many cases, the quality is even superior to that of animations made in Daz Studio.
So why all the objections? Because they aren’t “real”? Because AI supposedly takes work away from artists? Or perhaps simply because criticizing anything made with AI has become a trendy attitude?
Whether people accept it or not, times will change. It's just a matter of different people's ability to accept it.I always find it rather curious to read the criticism aimed at AI-generated animations. Until just a few months ago, it was unthinkable for us developers to produce quality animations without facing endless production times. Today, however, it’s possible to create scenes lasting several minutes with relatively little effort.
And, in many cases, the quality is even superior to that of animations made in Daz Studio.
So why all the objections? Because they aren’t “real”? Because AI supposedly takes work away from artists? Or perhaps simply because criticizing anything made with AI has become a trendy attitude?
If they changed it to have the artists opt in for their works to be used then my ethical objections will go away. There are lawsuits, in the USA at least, about that. It'll be interesting how that turns out.Yeah I'll be honest, I was expecting a lot ofcomments towards the gif. I see nothing wrong with it and I like it.
It's definitely trendy but not entirely because without real art, A.I can't come up with anything. That's the consensus anyway. A.I has to steal and mash up already created ART and some people have a rigid worldview of it.
even if A.I is used to ENHANCE real art, it's unacceptable to some.
If they changed it to have the artists opt in for their works to be used then my ethical objections will go away. There are lawsuits, in the USA at least, about that. It'll be interesting how that turns out.Yeah I'll be honest, I was expecting a lot ofcomments towards the gif. I see nothing wrong with it and I like it.
It's definitely trendy but not entirely because without real art, A.I can't come up with anything. That's the consensus anyway. A.I has to steal and mash up already created ART and some people have a rigid worldview of it.
even if A.I is used to ENHANCE real art, it's unacceptable to some.
While running game code:
File "game/script/sc_06.rpy", line 510, in script
if sc_06_3 == 2:
File "game/script/sc_06.rpy", line 510, in <module>
if sc_06_3 == 2:
^^^^^^^
NameError: name 'sc_06_3' is not defined. Did you mean: 'sc_06_03'?