donprdro wrote:
"What the crappy game from a really really rejected asshole developer. The initial first page for warning, itself shows that developer is an asshole and rejected from everywhere because his/her lack of professionalism. "Adult game or adult entertainment is all thing about sexual preferences." If somebody is not gay, you cannot force them to play gay character and every processional developer knows this well. Hence always makes options available for player to decided the course of play-through. Here the ass hole developer forces MC to play Gay characters. (no option to going otherwise)
All the fucking stupid chase is to get girls just topless and that even in private. All the dares of Rachael are in private. Katherine gets only topless and again in private, but MC need to be humiliated in public to fuck her........Shit loads of crap (no other options Given to complete the opportunity with Katherine). None of the girls actually get complete naked in public. There used to be a scenario involving Madison with some what ENF (Embarrassed Nude Female), But again the asshole rejected developers had it removed."
This is not constructive criticism. Please don't tell me this is the kind of "criticism" you are encouraging on these forums. I would have to agree with the guy saying this guy should make his own game. Cause he clearly doesn't understand how much work a game like this takes. Creative choices are up to the creator if you don't like them just move on, these comments are not wanted or needed. Alright well that's my 2 cents I hope you can take this as constructive and not attacking. We all are here to enjoy a free fun game.
Go ahead and re-read my post:
"I am sure I am somehow the bad guy since I pointed the flaw in your argument/response."
You provided nothing of value, neither a refutation nor a cogent argument. Just your subjective opinion.
I pointed out the flaw in someone else's argument/reasoning.
You seem to just want to take sides, while I do not.
This isnt an opinion, an invalid argument is invalid no matter how much you want it to be valid.
The "Go make your own X" can be used against anyone, saying anything, about anything.
Therefore it cannot possibly be accepted as valid reasoning, argument, or criticism.
And if you still dont understand what I am saying, then I'll make it real easy:
Someone who believes that the Earth is flat makes a claim/argument, we'll call them Person A.
Person B does not believe the Earth is flat, and tries to criticize that by making a really bad invalid argument.
It does not matter if I myself do not believe that the Earth is flat and is in fact an oblate spheroid, I'll still point out Person B's error in reasoning.
Understood?
A bad argument is bad no matter which conclusion it tries to support.
And if you still dont get it, I cannot help you.
Good day.
