Third person is a style, it was chosen because simulating every individual action and decision is narratively meaningless. It would just be noise and it would be boring.
Wrong, its a perspective not a style.Go back to school and learn the difference.
It's not that you Can't do it, I have given an example of an Expert Player playing something like Hearthstone as an example. If they explain the game and what they are doing is that not first person?
Your example is a false assumption. I have done online tutorials and game play as well. What I say is by no ways the same as what I am thinking. In fact I think about what I am going to say before I say it. Also if I am in a game I'm also thinking about the strategy and so on depending on the type of game play. So for every one thing I express for others to hear I have about 20 other things I am contemplating.
If I am doing something like a programming tutorial code review something. That goes up a lot more.
Try to write you yourself Hikaru no Go from a first person perspective using your genius intellect.
It would be boring.
But it's a question of suitability.
I wouldn't try and write that from a first person perspective that would just be stupid.
Secondly, you are the one who claimed it was possible for a less intelligent person to write from the more intelligent view point.
I'm not the one with something to prove. That's you. There is no way for me to prove the negative claim the burden of proof lies on the person making the positive claim. That is you in this case.
So stop trying to turn the shit on me.
Or didn't anyone ever teach you anything about arguments and discussions. The more you talk the bigger fool you look like.
Keep going. The Burden of proof lies on you.
But it's not like we don't have plenty of novels of first person perspective, and as an author you control the plot, pacing and context so suitability is never an issue.
If we go by your logic on the argument of first person versus third person then Nobody would be able to write an intelligent first person protagonist since their Mind would be too incomprehensible or boring for everyone.
Most first person perspective works are done at the authors level. Those that aren't and are successful usually get a third party who is of that level to write and or provide feed back to them on the work.
You know ghost writers and consultants make good money because of this exact issue.
Authors can write however they want depending on what they are trying to achive. You are saying they can't.
Not if they want to be successful but you are correct in the fact we have no laws preventing people from writing crap.
There are lots of books on the shelves that have flopped over the years and end up in land fills.
You say I don't understand the difference between third person and or first person.
But you don't seem to understand the difference between the Thinking of a Fictional Character and a Real Person are not the same, whether its third or first person.
This is why you are saying not having the IQ of a Real Person means you cannot construct the Thinking of a Fictional Character.
A fictional character does not Think in Isolation, they Think for the Plot, and the author Controls the Plot.
And why I have given Hikaru no Go as an example.
Again wrong assumption. My point is people can tell when someone who is not the same intelligence the character portrays writes the character. It works in both directions. That's why all major schools teach to only do first person at your own level.
Anyone can tell when a character isn't acting smart as they should be because the author wrote out side of their area.
Anyone can tell when a character isn't acting as stupid as they should be when an author writes to far below himself.
It isn't just up it goes up and down.
The difference is smart people tend to realize the issue more so they know not to write down to far.
People less intelligent don't get the what the issues is and take it as some sort of insult as if they are being told not write up wards.
Your the later in that case.
Or are you arguing that writers without sufficient galaxy brains like you authors cannot write plots and stories anymore?
Again I'm not the one who has to prove something here. The "burden of proof" is on you.
Only a positive claim can be proven which is your side of the argument.
You claim you could write successfully above your level.
So far all you have been is talk.
Since you are insistent on calling me galaxy brain. From this point forward you will be dubbed Micro Brain. After all its the side of the argument you chose to defend. I can only assume from your position and your arguments that you feel sufficiently lacking in that area and who am I to argue with you on that point. After all you know yourself best.
Thanks for the laugh Micro Brain.
