- Jun 4, 2018
- 388
- 825
Digging the matching outfits/style, that's pretty good.Did some Fan-art of Andy and Ashley for Kind Nightmares
(THIS IN NO WAY UNDERMINDS HIS TALENTS)
Digging the matching outfits/style, that's pretty good.Did some Fan-art of Andy and Ashley for Kind Nightmares
(THIS IN NO WAY UNDERMINDS HIS TALENTS)
And thank you for your comments for every chapter, they make me smile!Got done with chapter 4 now...
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Thank you for this game thus far, and looking forward for more!!!
Pardon me? You mean "You need to learn that blackmail only works on those who DON'T want to be blackmailed."Jade (to Andy): "You need to learn that blackmail only works on those who want to be blackmailed."
Unless she's playing some serious 5D chess here, I think it's missing a "don't."
Once in a month, maybe month and a half.How often are updates?
I'm afraid that phrase doesn't quite work in English.Jade meant that you can't blackmail someone who doesn't want to be blackmailed.
Actually the phrase works, and delivers its intended meaning pretty well. It doesn't mean it targets the people who are getting off on the stuff, it means that you cannot blackmail someone who won't let themselves be controlled, or too cowardly to do or say anything about it and thus act submissive. Not all blackmail attempts in the world are successful, some people resist it and even turn the tables on their opponent. Jade is one such person.I'm afraid that phrase doesn't quite work in English.
You cannot blackmail someone who doesn't want to to be blackmailed -> You can blackmail someone if and only if they want to be blackmailed...?
Nobody wants to be blackmailed unless they're getting off on some kind of BDSM aspect of it. Otherwise it's a strictly hostile interaction; nobody wants to be robbed or beaten. The negative can work in this case (You need to learn that blackmail only works on those who don't want to be blackmailed) but only because the alternative assumption is not that a person would want to be blackmailed, but that they simply don't care. And, frankly, that wording is more natural. "You need to learn that blackmail only works on those who care about being blackmailed" sounds more in line with the assertion of dominance at play here. "You need to learn that blackmail only works on those who care about your blackmail" could work as well, and focuses more on her dismissing what dirt he has on her rather than claiming to not care about blackmail in general.
Anyways, I was reminded of your game earlier today:
View attachment 3681669
It doesn't deliver it well, because it's not immediately clear what is meant by it.Actually the phrase works, and delivers its intended meaning pretty well.
Just as a film can't be appreciated on a smudged and scratched projector, a story can't captivate a reader with unclear or incorrect language. Anybody that wants the game to succeed should care about the writing being clear and correct. This problem snaps the reader out of their immersion in the story like few others and is appropriately the frequent target of criticism of VNs. I'm not attacking Kind Nightmares, I'm trying to help the language of the game communicate their excellent characters.who care it's just a phrase , the story in it self is more important in my humble opinion
That's not really an appropriate analogy.Just as a film can't be appreciated on a smudged and scratched projector, a story can't captivate a reader with unclear or incorrect language.
As clear and understandable as the dev can, which has overall been fine so far. The phrase used was correct, but it isn't as clear as it could/should be.Anybody that wants the game to succeed should care about the writing being clear and correct.
I still to this day have a grudge against a particular translation made in the Hexagon that didn't care to consider that it would be read in the whole of French speaking countrys. More than TWENY years later. It got me right out of the story I was reading. I would argue that while the specific section of text discussed here had me pause a bit in my reading to make sure I understood KN's intent clearly, it is not as bad as my previous experience.Just as a film can't be appreciated on a smudged and scratched projector, a story can't captivate a reader with unclear or incorrect language. Anybody that wants the game to succeed should care about the writing being clear and correct. This problem snaps the reader out of their immersion in the story like few others and is appropriately the frequent target of criticism of VNs. I'm not attacking Kind Nightmares, I'm trying to help the language of the game communicate their excellent characters.
Your non English autocorrect is showing. (That is why I rarely post while at work.)the only think is work fro me since the start of the game[im not saying nothing else works] is that she isnt going to take shit from anybody[bcs only that i love the game] so try to blackmail a person who sont care about the shitty ppl is amuse,but now we have that she cares about others too,those who she will willing to bend her own boundaries and nerves,....and to be honest that inquiring character she have is what ppls say ,curiosity kills the cat and knock up the women's
Hey there. I'm the English proofreader for the game. That phrase gave me a small pause when I first read it, but it did make sense to me. It could have been phrased better, perhaps, but I felt that the line fit Jade's character well. Keep in mind that Jade was under pressure to come up with a response, very quickly. Also, while she is a very smart person, she didn't get to finish her primary education, so on a few occasions, I've left some imperfections in her dialogue to reflect that. It wouldn't feel natural if Jade spoke like an English professor, when she was pulled out of school at 16.I'm afraid that phrase doesn't quite work in English.
You cannot blackmail someone who doesn't want to to be blackmailed -> You can blackmail someone if and only if they want to be blackmailed...?
Nobody wants to be blackmailed unless they're getting off on some kind of BDSM aspect of it. Otherwise it's a strictly hostile interaction; nobody wants to be robbed or beaten. The negative can work in this case (You need to learn that blackmail only works on those who don't want to be blackmailed) but only because the alternative assumption is not that a person would want to be blackmailed, but that they simply don't care. And, frankly, that wording is more natural. "You need to learn that blackmail only works on those who care about being blackmailed" sounds more in line with the assertion of dominance at play here. "You need to learn that blackmail only works on those who care about your blackmail" could work as well, and focuses more on her dismissing what dirt he has on her rather than claiming to not care about blackmail in general.
Anyways, I was reminded of your game earlier today:
View attachment 3681669
Native English speaker here, works just fine for me. The implication is that people place more value in their image than in their own self-worth, they create the environment for their own blackmail. It also has an extra spark of distain compared to the vanilla "You can't blackmail someone who refuses to be blackmailed"I'm afraid that phrase doesn't quite work in English.
You cannot blackmail someone who doesn't want to to be blackmailed -> You can blackmail someone if and only if they want to be blackmailed...?