[...]futa (god, I hate that word) [...]
Why? If I'm not mistaken, it means "both" (to two? Or something like this, I don't speak Japanese, even under torture, but each time I see something with the futa prefixe it relates to a set of two things/people), is the word "both" so offensive? Considering futanari is a genre with characters having both sets of genitalia, I can't see a better word to describe it.
This actually brings up an interesting point. Earlier Inomsim was acting like fiction and reality are, and should be, completely separate (
You must be registered to see the links
, but that's besides the point). Does anyone else find porn that doesn't try to have some sense of realism is just... completely boring? Like, if it isn't giving actual characters and relationships then it's basically 2 pieces of meat slapping together and like... why would I give a shit at that point?
I'm not acting. It's not because people are influenced by fiction that fiction is reality. And it's not because some (and unfortunately most) people can't make the difference that the difference doesn't exist or shouldn't be made.
With the tastes I have in porn, if reality and fiction were the same thing, I would be in prison. On the other hand, I wouldn't even consider the idea of doing anything I see or like in porn. Actually, most of them would be things I would find disturbing and disgusting in real life.
Then, not only the cultivation theory is controversial, it only focuses on one group of people (Americans, who are some of the most easily influenced people on the planet), but it also shows that the impact is the most important when there is a deliberate vocation to manipulate the audience (that's why, despite not being homophobic or transphobic, I hate LGBT whatever you want to add after that, content with a passion)
And you can add all the realism you want to a piece of fiction, it will stay fiction, otherwise it would be a documentary unless Ridley Scott makes it.