- Mar 15, 2023
- 879
- 1,653
I don't understand what is your point. That Maya have seen broken people before? It would be strange if she wasn't. It would be more strange that she haven't seen something which we assume to be possible. My point was that she haven't acted like "holy shit, something attempted to kill Makoto" when she saw her broken.Not quite, I think you skipped over how Maya implied that things like Makoto, after the jump, have happened before:which seems to imply other girls have faced death and been traumatized before, among other things.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Maya also seemed convinced the roof doesn't really matter:You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
However, the more I think than more I want to take that argument back, because Maya could just act as she don't know to protect Sensei from understanding what have he done. But it cannot be evidence for "nobody can die" theory anyway
This scene has same meaniing as bluejay: when specificly Makoto tries to kill herself, she rollbacks. It is not like she rollback from the point she actualy dead. It is not like it is not specific to suicide attempts. It proves nothing but that some supernatural shit rollbacks specificly Makoto when she specificly attempts suicide.We also have later stuff like Makoto seemingly implying she's tried killing herself after her father died:You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
And theory "nobody can die in Kumon-mi" might be a good generalization of specific evidence, but people actualy die. As long as we have only two cases and they are so similar, there is no way to reason any distinguisher between people who can die and people who cannot.
Can you please explain "obviously new"? If you mean it is first time her father is dead, wouldn't it imply that he obliviously cannot die twice?Not to mention, Makoto's father dying is something obviously new, so I don't think it's fair to assume something outside the usual is suddenly the usual. Makoto's father also seems permanently gone unlike others, just like Todd. Their deaths are definitely exceptions to the norm, and even the resets themselves haven't brought them back.
Also, what makes you think that direct evidences agianst you theory are exceptions but not counter-proofs
Yep, Maya could be lying. It is not a big secret, that Maya is extremly cryptic about any knowledge that could damage her friends or Sensei. It would not be too hard to hide a secret if psyco Ami haven't occured in centuriesAs for the rest, as far as has been revealed, there has never been other girls besides Molly and Tsuneyo before. Maya specifically notes it's either 10 or 12:Maya could be lying, or there could have been resets before Maya, but overall, what we have to go on suggests that it's just always been 10 and rarely 12 untill now. Why? Probably related to why the resets happen, characters get stuck on repeat, and there's only two seasons.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Same argument, Maya is not a reliable source. Event that pieces of information was taken from her under serious pressureMaya also seems to confirm that Psycho Ami doing whatever she did had no lasting consequences (besides likely on Maya's mental state), as there isn't a single girl in the class before all of the transfers that Psycho Ami hadn't, well, gone psycho on, yet the class is still here however many resets later, and so is Maya, who has also seemed to imply that Psycho Ami has killed her as well:Unless Ami has never truly wanted to kill Maya, or Maya is just exaggerating for some reason.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
It is safe to assume that Maya would not remember her own death if she ever died, so it is more like proof that Ami never truly wanted to kill specificaly Maya.