1. I made valid theories as to why it could be
2. Except the checkmarks from the 2nd reset are Kirin, Chika and Niki
3. There is a reason why one checkmark is bigger than the others, it's not a coincidence, it is literally different which means there must be a reason for it
4. You are just deciding on your own that those things hold no value on your own, when in fact they do
5. what's the point of number 5 even?
Edit: It's LITERALLY UNDISPUTABLE, that Kirin, Chika and Niki were virgins and akira took their checkmarks for the board, it happened in the story, you can see it for yourself in the events and that's how it is, we have VISUAL proof of them bleeding, being virgins and giving their first time to Akira, but we DONT have proof that Molly was penetrated by Akira, you have no basis for an argument here
1. And I am here to see how you'd defend your idea; at least try to prove that the possibility in your head is quantitatively equal or larger than the one in mine.
2. I am just going to assume you meant
4th here and not 2nd. Regardless,
Niki's event (How To Make Love Stay) takes place in Ch3 so it is chronologically impossible to have Niki as a checkmark at 4th reset.
3. I didn't question your thought on "Bigger checkmark == There must be a reason for it".
What I was aiming at is "How do you prove that reason is well aligned with your headcanon".
I went back and check your other posts and found that you also said the big one might be Akira's. While all of our conjectures are merely supported by "I think it'd be cool if it turns out to be like that", the only thing about the bigger checkmark I really care is the fact that
it wasn't there at 2nd reset and it was there at 4th reset. Even if it really means something, it's more reasonable to think that it's related to an incident in Ch2. Otherwise, it should have been there since 2nd reset, indirectly ruling out the possibility of it representing Maya, Sekai, Akira, etc.
4. Share you thoughts. What values do "Akira is Ami's father" and "Akira losing V-card to Sekai" have
in determining which checkmark is which? How do you utilize these two information?
5. It means all the checkmarks we can gather from the game are only from those two time points; we can use these clues to benchmark whatever prompt we set for ourselves when attempting to explain them, but we can't quote anything
beyond 4th reset because we never get to see the billboard again and check how it looks like again; that data point is lacking. I am again referring to all your attempts in bringing Niki into the discussion.
In the end, there are two things we don't agree: Sekai and Molly.
- The Sekai part? Sure. I think
Maya Sekai/Ayane/Ami/Makoto isn't more possible but not impossible (again how more possible it might be cannot be shown by "Akira is Ami's father" or "Akira losing V-card to Sekai"; the logic bridge in between is lacking)
- The Molly part? You're very fixated on the virgin blood, and to be fair I don't necessarily disagree with you on it. I am honestly not here to argue her or anyone's hymen status without direct disclosure from the game itself; instead I am here to test what input assumption fits the observed evidences better with less contradictions, and for the time being no girl would fit better than Molly for now, with Niki's possibility being exactly zero and with the arrival of this meta Q&A (btw I absolutely dislike Sel for revealing this level of information via discord and not via his work;
SLOPPY).
If you still hold fast to Molly not being raped, you can try to come up with another list of candidates for the checkmarks that doesn't require any overboard assumption and doesn't violate any well established premises, under the hypothesis that
checkmarks = V-card claimed by Akira.
