- Jul 1, 2017
- 346
- 264
For the first part, and?And what about people who have contributed in some way?
There are people who were Patreons for a long time, they gave their money and their investment for quite a while. And there are people who gave their time and even tried participating in game's discord channel in some way in order to contribute directly to the game development.
What about those people? Should they also just shut up and be ignored?
Not everyone just came here and started giving critiques after playing for free, no, there are people who have actually invested into the game one way or another and I think that they should be able to voice their dissatisfaction with the project's development direction or if they find their experience underwhelming in some way.
There are also people who also know a thing or two about game development and if they want to share their experience, should they also be silenced?
This idea of "If you are negative, then you should just shut up and move along" is not only dumb, but it's also a detrumental one. Developers very often can get intangled within their own fantasies and lose their focus of what is important, they can overrate their skills and plan way too much, thus not achieving anything in particular. Sometimes everyone requires a "reality check" and negative feedback can do just that. I agree that when giving negative feedback one should control their words and not overstep their boundaries though - be constructive, don't switch to personalities and try explain why something doesn't click with you or in your opinion just doesn't work out.
But the overall idea of shutting people because some content is free is an absolute BS. This is the Internet, people are free to voice their opinions whatever they are. And if they overstep their boundaries web-site has mods, who will judge the situation and will act accordingly to it.
Like everything in this beautiful and disgusting world we live in, nothing is true and everything is true.
People who supported the project in the past clearly have the right to get angry and yell all they want, but because it happened, that doesn´t imply that it gives them the absolute right to complain whenever they want, even if who was the culprit (more or less in this case, given that recalling, they exposed the problem that existed and it was by the majority of the vote of those who contributed that the decision of the restart was reached instead of the continuation with the old model that, of continue in it, it would cause things to be implemented in a way that the more they touched of the above, the more time it would take to re-accommodate everything and therefore, more time between one version and another, while if instead, it had been for their saints Eggs close the old model and start this one [for the degree of hatred and criticism that has been seen] with all the pleasure that they get angry and even I would support the scream, but it was decided fairly by the majority and not because one was of the side to continue, it gives the right to be angry for life about it) they showed their faces and are trying to make things right, instead of closing the door and as if nothing had happened.
A worse and better example was the case of No man's sky. Worse because what they did was unlikely and they even tried to escape. And better because, yes ... thanks to the continuous witch hunt that people did, they managed to force them to improve the game to the point where, in my humble opinion, although it doesn´t reach what they promised, the game is hundreds of times better than what they started with and even if you don't know what happened, the game is enjoyable.
The point that I tried to say was that, yes ... the cry to the sky reached, anger and even what wasn´t necessary was said, and? The team at no time tried to escape, the change wasn´t made by their holy will but was made by the election of the majority in a clear and fair vote, those who were on one side or the other or didn´t participate and were contributing, of course that they can and should get angry and withdraw their support, but not for that, they have the right to be day and night trying to attack, damage or prevent that if others in their free will whether or not they inform themselves (for this point, it is impossible that there is no one who doesn´t find out) and they want to support, try to prevent it or make those who still believe in their word and support or are new feel as if they were support at birth or contribute from some world evil.
As I mentioned, we all have our own lives and we do with it what we want or can and if you want to spend how much or little you have on something, be it good, bad, enriching or degrading, it is your choice given that and as indicated when you are going to support in patreon, kick, etc., as an adult that you are or supposedly you are, in your free will, having (we know that almost nobody) read the rules and already on your own depending on whether or not you informed yourself about what that you are going to spend, is the decision and its due response.
Also, if we leave aside all the above mentioned, this is like investing in something (cryptocurrencies, banks, stocks, etc.) investing is a continuous bet, sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. Sometimes when you win you even help something to happen and sometimes when you lose, it is absolutely, although the same can also apply to things bought in full. How many times has there not been a time when something doesn´t deserve what it is worth or for what it gives, it is even unfair that it is only worth that? But that already depends on each one to define it, because there is no absolute truth for anything that is not of natural origin, elemental or more in our domain and even those for the moment.
The criticism applied in the right direction is to help those who haven´t been able to make a decision to create one, while the criticism carried to the extremes as those that have been reached here, not only has already passed the point of what is understandable and acceptable , but it is already about to reach the toxic point (on a scale from less to greater obviously) than some communities (it goes without saying, we all know what I mean) in some places because they don´t like "one" or "another" thing They demand in such a way (and because of their economic weight above all) that regardless of whether they ruin that "one" or "other" for others, they get it and the rest get screwed. And that point can come here even when the date or dates that said something new would come out haven´t even arrived, if it had already happened, it would not be worth trying to calm the storm in the glass, but that isn´t the case.
For the second part. I agree, but the problem is that even the mods on the site have already gotten rid of the situation here, it was 2 or 3 times that they asked to please stop talking about the subject (because the subject had already been discussed and for the record to inform anyone who came, the idea was already too expressed) but since people haven´t stopped (nor are they going to stop) for a long time as long as some strong rule isn´t broken, they no longer bother to intervene in this matter, such as It happens in other threads in which there are more reasons to be angry about how the devs of their respective projects act.
The feedback of course is good and necessary, but when it is already well known and even the developers themselves have already said that they know it and within the measure of what can be tried to pay attention (since one thing is to listen and try to fulfill most of what is possible and another is that they move everything fully or completely to the beat of what the community demands, there isn´t a single game [at least of medium relevance] that 100% or 80% does everything that the community demands and that is also good, because even if it is the community who pays for the development or who buys, that doesn´t give the right to bind the creator or creators to change the work to their liking, except that from the beginning there is any clause, option or possibility that has been established from the beginning.