Here's my thing that's based purely off speculation. Lacey, Mia, and Anna are all targets of NTR villains (I don't remember if they say them by name, so I suppose it's possible it could be Lacey, Mia, and Veronica or something like that?). However, I don't think the NTR villains would target them specifically unless they actually thought that they would have a chance to win. You don't look at someone who isn't damaged and be like "Yeah, they are going to be a huge slut/whore/drug addict for me"
They are specifically targeting Lacey, Pimp and Anna, they say their names two times I think.
Their objective is to separate MC from them, which is a recurring theme during act 2, with MC being the glue etc.
A bit of a weird angle if you ask me, but that is ok.
So, I think that MC's perception of Anna is a bit skewed. She was there for him when he had no one, so I think that he doesn't see/comprehend some of her flaws (though we as players get some hints to them).
She was, and maybe he doesn't understand her completely (even if MC has the gift of perfectly reading people, as can be seeing in the promotion party).
Don't forget that Anna abandoned him at some point in junior year (I want to say beginning?).
The reasons for going after Lacey and Mia are pretty obvious, especially Lacey. So, I'm thinking there has to be something about Anna that we don't know yet either. It could be nothing, but I'm not convinced that Anna is who MC thinks she is
I think we should really think about the fact that the author made a specific point to say "Not everything you see is objective" at the start of the story. The professor might have just used it as a "this allows me to retcon things if I need", but I feel like they must have had something specific in mind when they wrote it
The problem I have with "not everything you see is objective" is the constant change of perspective.
We see plenty of perspectives, sometimes with Lacey alone, sometimes with Lacey and friends, sometimes with Jared alone, sometimes with FV.
So what do we make of those, is it MC that asked them to recount what happened and then makes hos own idea?
I think we should drop the MC perspective point and accept that it was an early idea that got a bit forgotten for storytelling purposes!
Well what trait of Anna that Mc recognizes you think is wrong? this is a genuine question, I am having troubles with her.
Well, with the whole unreliable narrator, and I will need
DeviantFun here I think, at what point does it definitively switch from the MC recounting the past to actual present time?
It seems it is done already at the beginning (what I meant here is the split between past and present is set at the beginning).
"There's me."
"I'm in my early 20s."
"I've been blessed with a lean physique that some women seem to be attracted to."
"And I'm also pretty well..."
"Anyway that's not important right now."
"I'm coming up on my one year wedding anniversary."
So everything after the missed anniversary IS present time, act 2 is full on present time for sure.
CrysusPariah2 would it make sense for you to add this to the timeline?