CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x

Ren'Py Completed Milfy City [v1.0e] [ICSTOR]

3.80 star(s) 436 Votes
Discussion Reviews (436)
D

Deleted User #713463

Engaged Member
Jun 28, 2018
2,005
396
not enough he said this week so its not going to be in the 10 like i suspected its going to be without animations so why to release it who want game without animation are this comics game or what
 
j4yj4m

j4yj4m

Forum Fanatic
Jun 19, 2017
4,176
6,144
Ilan back in black said:
I'm not talking about dev's that are already making a good amount of money, 10-15k$ is a very good amount of money. I'm talking about the dev's that have to work their day jobs and then develop their games. If these dev's would earn more they could upgrade their equipment and maybe even quit their dayjobs and start developing fulltime. It might be that not every dev would increase in quality but there are several that would increase in quality and update more frequently.

When you take a look around here on F95 and check some of the games, that are not your usual braindead crap, and see that not few of these dev's make less than 1k$ you'll understand what i mean.
Click to expand...
Well, that's a different question though. You are basically saying that one shouldn't give money to devs which are already popular, because they make enough. That's fine. But most of those do make that kind of money because people like their games better than others and thus are prepared to pay. At that point a lot of money starts to flow and devs have to deal with that in one way or the other. That was the point I wanted to make. I mean, it's not really about fairness or the "best overall use of money" in that case. Sure, there a few games I personally wish would do better, but then again I know in many cases why they don't.
 
Carpe Stultus

Carpe Stultus

Engaged Member
Sep 30, 2018
3,402
8,856
j4yj4m said:
Well, that's a different question though. You are basically saying that one shouldn't give money to devs which are already popular, because they make enough. That's fine. But most of those do make that kind of money because people like their games better than others and thus are prepared to pay. At that point a lot of money starts to flow and devs have to deal with that in one way or the other. That was the point I wanted to make. I mean, it's not really about fairness or the "best overall use of money" in that case. Sure, there a few games I personally wish would do better, but then again I know in many cases why they don't.
Click to expand...
There are also dev's who just make a lot of money because they are in the business for a long time and people just keep supporting them without even playing their games, but thats a different topic. I get your point.

There are sure cases where i wish the game would do better but i know that even a lot of money wouldn't change that, but there are also games where i know that more money would increase the quality and frequenzy of the updates because the dev would dive in fulltime. It is really a double edged sword in some cases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arms99
G

Gh8st

Newbie
Sep 12, 2017
22
10
What can I say. 3-4 month for this update is too much. Previous week or weeks were for testing and here we go again. The best solution is to show real release date. After that date all patrons payments stay on hold and patrons don't be waste their money on devs problems. Cause every developer must plan his time, if you need extra time(tests, bugs) add it before releasing new date. I know it because I'm also developer. In my opinion, it looks like dev is milking users for more money.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: cimibibapa2, Jaun Karr and Kermit79
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
3.80 star(s) 436 Votes