- Aug 21, 2020
- 745
- 1,808
I don't know if I would call it planned
, but...You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
, but...
- Dec 6, 2021
- 131
- 398
The new version is still downloading so I haven't seen it yet! Hopefully Kira can be impregnated too!I don't know if I would call it planned
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
- May 22, 2017
- 3,098
- 7,532
Loads of errors:
A duplicate *.rpyc file of sister_after_date.rpyc named sister_room.rpyc (different files, almost the same content, with the sister_after_date.rpyc being obviously a newer version, but the old file had a different name and its compiled rpyc hasn't been removed, creating a duplicate label.
After deleting sister_room.rpyc all the duplicate variable definitions start to pop up, starting with the sister_city_rework being defined in 4 (!) different places:
history_teacher_preg in 2 places:
Then an error about a global variable named traced_expressions not being defined at all...
I stopped here. The game is a mess that needs to be worked out and cleaned up. Variable definitions should be re-organized, put to one place. Right now they seem to be scattered around in random multiple places...
Yes, it's a mess. No better word for it.
Doesn't look like anyone has tried to run it even once before publishing.
A duplicate *.rpyc file of sister_after_date.rpyc named sister_room.rpyc (different files, almost the same content, with the sister_after_date.rpyc being obviously a newer version, but the old file had a different name and its compiled rpyc hasn't been removed, creating a duplicate label.
After deleting sister_room.rpyc all the duplicate variable definitions start to pop up, starting with the sister_city_rework being defined in 4 (!) different places:
Bash:
$ grep -iEnr --include=*.rpy "default sister_city_rework"
backend.rpy:1:default sister_city_rework = 0
momatic.rpy:1:default sister_city_rework = 0
mom_chi.rpy:3:default sister_city_rework = 0
moneyback.rpy:1:default sister_city_rework = 0
Bash:
$ grep -iEnr --include=*.rpy "default history_teacher_preg"
school_pre_ev.rpy:1:default history_teacher_preg = 0
version05end.rpy:1:default history_teacher_preg = 0I stopped here. The game is a mess that needs to be worked out and cleaned up. Variable definitions should be re-organized, put to one place. Right now they seem to be scattered around in random multiple places...
Yes, it's a mess. No better word for it.
Doesn't look like anyone has tried to run it even once before publishing.
Last edited:
- Oct 26, 2017
- 5,603
- 16,795
- Apr 20, 2018
- 891
- 3,322
to be honest I prefer a WT-Mod for the games I play if there is non I'm skip through the code to make my decisions, because I'm generally not interested in a not optimal playthrough or multiple playthroughs, nobody got time for that.
- Dec 6, 2021
- 131
- 398
I get that, I meant in reference to games like this where there isn't an optimal playthrough, and only two options in each choice. My point being that if people just tried the game for 5 minutes they would understand whether or not a walkthrough is necessary.
Enabling the console breaks the game, I've noticed that this happens in other games where they've hidden config.console = False somewhere in the scripts or rpyc's. For the life of me I can't find where.
Nah, it's because this game actually has syntax errors. I suspect the dev is developing without developer mode enabled to avoid them.
Delete `sister_room.rpyc` entirely (duplicate file), remove the multiple duplicate `default` variables, and the console will launch.
Lazy_Monkey your life will be much easier if you do this lol
Last edited:
- Oct 12, 2020
- 842
- 4,565
The only complaint I have is that it would have been nice to see more explicit vaginal penetration in the sex scene with mom on the love route. It really didn't show much.
Still, I loved the scene. You could tell it was the love route scene. All that romantic incest dialogue... Damn. They work really well.
Still, I loved the scene. You could tell it was the love route scene. All that romantic incest dialogue... Damn. They work really well.
- Mar 25, 2018
- 1,274
- 2,290
It's okay but the camera angles during sex acts are really bad.
It's like watching soft porn with no actual angle to see vaginal penetration
Could do with interactive choices for different angles and position during sex scenes ideally.
It's like watching soft porn with no actual angle to see vaginal penetration
Could do with interactive choices for different angles and position during sex scenes ideally.
Last edited:
- Nov 12, 2021
- 884
- 692
- Oct 16, 2021
- 647
- 1,628
- Jul 1, 2021
- 76
- 2,449
