- Jan 24, 2018
- 3,132
- 9,194
Only Maddie as far as I rememberHow many girls can we Dom? I haven't played much yet, been too addicted to BG3 to actually play any AVNs lately.
Only Maddie as far as I rememberHow many girls can we Dom? I haven't played much yet, been too addicted to BG3 to actually play any AVNs lately.
Or even sexyer (very fast render, sorry)Only Maddie as far as I remember
Why the Sorry? It looks very niceOr even sexyer (very fast render, sorry)
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Ok. I don't know if I should say this or not... (let me explain, for one side it will maybe attract the facepalm community, for the other I really feel like saying it)
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Muito Obrigado pelos Facepalms. (Thank you very much for the facepalms)
Peace![]()
É mesmo!Ok. I don't know if I should say this or not... (let me explain, for one side it will maybe attract the facepalm community, for the other I really feel like saying it)
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Muito Obrigado pelos Facepalms. (Thank you very much for the facepalms)
Peace![]()
You're welcome ! Happy to obligeMuito Obrigado pelos Facepalms. (Thank you very much for the facepalms)
I won't facepalm you because I understand you as a player. But as a developer I should disagree.Ok. I don't know if I should say this or not... (let me explain, for one side it will maybe attract the facepalm community, for the other I really feel like saying it)
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Muito Obrigado pelos Facepalms. (Thank you very much for the facepalms)
Peace![]()
I'm still thankful for this, I was worried I would have to exclude her from my Harem, which I didn't want to do, but big chicks just don't do anything for me, and I'm not one for accepting LI's for the sake of the story. If I did that I would just have to skip past her sex scenes and I don't like skipping past anything if it can be helped.I wouldn't play Kate's "slim path", for example, but I think the game improves by giving the player the option to do it.
It's absolutely OK to disagree with me.I won't facepalm you because I understand you as a player. But as a developer I should disagree.
I'm not into Dom; it shows when I write about it. Basically, I'm discovering what to do at the same pace as the characters.
What I like is to explore what the MC would do in certain circumstances, like the one he is with Maddie (be it FemDom or MaleDom). Obviously, it's not in the MC's character being totally dominant or totally submissive, and he's in a position he hasn't been in before.
For me, in my playthrough, it's the Romance path with Maddie except for testing, but I think it's an interesting experience to write the other paths also. I wouldn't play them as a player in my main playthrough, although since the menu system I designed allows to watch the alternatives as "what ifs?" in each path, perhaps I would play through them.
As always, it reduces to giving the players choices to customize their experience. I wouldn't play Kate's "slim path", for example, but I think the game improves by giving the player the option to do it.
I also am not a fan of the humiliation/pain aspects of BDSM. I'm fine with some light pain like pinching, slapping (not too hard though), and spanking, but again not too hard and not with like a cane or paddle, and only if my partner enjoys it. humiliation is something I am not a fan of in any capacity though. Dirty talk is one thing, if kept in private, but actual humiliation, especially in public is something I just never quite understood or enjoyed.It's absolutely OK to disagree with me.
I don't like Domination. No, that's not true, I abhor the whole concept. It matters not how light it is. I may be able to stand it if it's really light, but, I don't like it.
You, Trope, may be sure that I haven't seen any of the scenes you spent time and effort doing. No, not even as a "What If" when you provided that option.
Like some other contents, there's nothing wrong with it, it just isn't for me. I would go as far as saying that I do have a reaction to it when exposed. It's a insta-bonner-killer. Sometimes even just a slap is enough to turn me off.
It is what it is. I am extra sensitive to humiliation, pain and abuse, even if only by words. I would LOVE to not have the reasons I have to feel this way.
Peace![]()
I often see it as a modern variation of Ayn Rand's Objectivism. The same young men seem to fall for one as the other.Every time someone mentions the thoroughly debunked (even by it's authors) stupid paper about alphas and betas, a poor wolf cub dies of shame.
It's very appealing to those that would very much like to find a reason to affirm themselves as superior, even when that wish alone marks them as inferior due to the need of external affirmation, it simply isn't true.
So, every time someone brings it up, they are saying 2 things, that they want a comfortable lie instead of a thorny truth, and, that they feel a need to be seen as strong due to their feelings of inadequacy.
Or... they are the victims of a very dysfunctional society that needs it's members to feel in constant fight or flight stance so they never realize how fucked up that society is.
However you look at it, it is a sign of low intelligence and high aggressiveness, usually associated with chemical and hormonal imbalances.
You must be registered to see the links
Peace![]()
Huh So, I guess if someone was highly aggressive and of superior intellect, the world would be in trouble?![]()
I know Linda Lovelace shaved in Deep Throat. That was pretty much unheard of at the time.I'm old enough to remember it being very unusual for even a porn queen to be totally hairless downstairs. I think there was ONE...
Same here.I also am not a fan of the humiliation/pain aspects of BDSM. I'm fine with some light pain like pinching, slapping (not too hard though), and spanking, but again not too hard and not with like a cane or paddle, and only if my partner enjoys it. humiliation is something I am not a fan of in any capacity though. Dirty talk is one thing, if kept in private, but actual humiliation, especially in public is something I just never quite understood or enjoyed.
I've always been into the domination/submission aspects and focus of BDSM, especially in a roleplay capacity. Like pet play for example which is one of my personal favorites. Yes I know I'm a pervert, but hey it is what is is.
I do prefer romance focused games though, I don't like BDSM of any kind unless it's with someone I love and trust and vice versa, that enjoys the activity/lifestyle, otherwise it does nothing for me. Which is why I also dislike when games lock BDSM content behind a "corruption" route, where the relationship is basically a loveless sex fest void of any romance.
Anyways enough blabbing, gonna go make some Mozzarella sticks now.![]()
BDSM in the media tends to play fast and loose with consent. I think in a VN if you're going to have CNC (consensual non consent) play, one has to be VERY clear.I think the biggest issue with BDSM in games is that the player can't actively negotiate it like one can in reality.
In reality, everyone involved can say what they want and want they don't. What they're comfortable with and what they aren't.
Can't really do that in a VN or any game. You have to accept or refuse various kinks pretty much blind, then continue or load back depending on if things are to your tastes
Or, you know, they’re just using a colloquialism and/or engaging in a meme…Every time someone mentions the thoroughly debunked (even by it's authors) stupid paper about alphas and betas, a poor wolf cub dies of shame.
It's very appealing to those that would very much like to find a reason to affirm themselves as superior, even when that wish alone marks them as inferior due to the need of external affirmation, it simply isn't true.
So, every time someone brings it up, they are saying 2 things, that they want a comfortable lie instead of a thorny truth, and, that they feel a need to be seen as strong due to their feelings of inadequacy.
Or... they are the victims of a very dysfunctional society that needs it's members to feel in constant fight or flight stance so they never realize how fucked up that society is.
However you look at it, it is a sign of low intelligence and high aggressiveness, usually associated with chemical and hormonal imbalances.
You must be registered to see the links
Peace![]()
I think the biggest issue with BDSM in games is that the player can't actively negotiate it like one can in reality.
In reality, everyone involved can say what they want and want they don't. What they're comfortable with and what they aren't.
Can't really do that in a VN or any game. You have to accept or refuse various kinks pretty much blind, then continue or load back depending on if things are to your tastes
I will answer these posts as a writer. Since your points are very interesting.BDSM in the media tends to play fast and loose with consent. I think in a VN if you're going to have CNC (consensual non consent) play, one has to be VERY clear.
I expect that setting limits for scenes in a VN is doable. I'm definitely using safe words/levels in my D/s story. Thinking of that, it might be interesting to have a chose of playing as the dominant or the submissive partner, keeping in mind that the submissive is the one who is actually in control in the average scene. It is the Dom/Domme's job to monitor the sub's state in play. The goal (as I see it) is to help the sub to reach "sub space" through that trust.
I think that is one of the problems with many BDSM stories in VNs--it often focuses on the Dom's apparent power and doesn't give enough attention to the sub's actual power in a scene.
There is one story we're working on for which building trust will be paramount--"Dating Legion," which will be about being in a relationship with someone with Disassociative Identity Disorder.