No, I made suggestions that would improve the game, not Change anything significant in terms of creative vision, plot, or renders. Much like how Capcom changed the pressure sensitive pads on Street Fighter to the 6-button config, for example.
If the suggestions improve the game, why not? Surely as a developer you want the game to be the best it can be?
Sure I could, and I probably would if I felt any desire to continue playing the game, however a mix of the game being clunky as all fuckery, and the Dev being unwilling to accept any kind of critique, has made me stop playing. Almost as if there are better games out there, with devs who take critique on board to make a better game. Imagine that?
No you're not.
Bollocks. as I've said, explained, and used examples, the indication of progress is ESSENTIAL in any game, whether that is a counter, a graphic, whatever. To encourage your audience to keep playing, they need a reward, an indication they are doing things right, this is game design 101, it's not rocket science.
The Dev absolutely has the call, and they can absolutely do whatever they want, however, they cannot then get shirty when, after being told multiple times what is wrong with their game, they get mad because people are telling them what is wrong with their game, and ways to make it better. Again, People aren't doing it to be cunts, they are doing it because they want the game to be better.
Quit with the fake compliment bullshit mate, you're transparant as fuck and it's really fucking condescending.
You can have all the "Artistic Temperament" in the world, but again, if you're a cunt because people want your game to be better, that's not artistry, thats just being a cunt because you're upset that not everybody is sucking your dick.
Awww, are you not making consessions for my artistic temperament? funny how that works ain't it?