TheDuke9999

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2022
1,129
1,604
287
I'm assuming we are all single and lonely but maybe a few guys in this forum have a wife they actually care about.. quick question.. can i walk in your house, hug your wife/gf then proceed to kiss her on the lips while you just stand there and watch... can I? If so please let me know and I will be right over.. yes or no?
 

TonyMurray

Conversation Conqueror
Apr 8, 2024
6,492
12,246
774
If you cannot see how these actions will inevitably hurt your husband and you can't even apologize afterwards you don't love him or you are stupid.
Hard disagree. It would be right to apologise and have everything in the open, but not doing it doesn't mean an absence of love or a presence of stupidity. Again, Vivian is trying to protect Hutch. You might not think it's the right way to do it, you might not think it's possible to do it, but she shows that it's her mindset:
"He can never know. He doesn't deserve to carry that pain. It would destroy him."
"I have to carry it for both of us... I have to!"

I'm assuming we are all single and lonely but maybe a few guys in this forum have a wife they actually care about.. quick question.. can i walk in your house, hug your wife/gf then proceed to kiss her on the lips while you just stand there and watch... can I? If so please let me know and I will be right over.. yes or no?
Married (and happily so) for 15 years, and of course you can't. But that has no bearing here, because I'm not Hutch and Hutch is not me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fbass

Dealbreaker

Active Member
May 12, 2024
952
1,073
220
I just don't buy into the argument that by doing something, where you know that hurting someone will likely be a by product, you are therefore intentionally hurting them.
Just for the record and not to prolongue the debate: If any justice system would be based on this principle, everything would break down. Instead there you have a principle of intent which means knowing and doing equals responsibility.
And imagine how you would educate children based on that principle? How would this offer a child clear ethical guidance and responsibility?
 

Dealbreaker

Active Member
May 12, 2024
952
1,073
220
Hard disagree.
Mature love has to acknowledge and to consider the will and the perspective and the interest of the person you claim you are loving. It is interactional, not solipsistic. Otherwise you are loving your own feeling and not this real person in front of you with his own subjectivity. You can't assume superiority and act over him which she clearly does. This is not just a "mistake" but it's not the kind of love I would wish for in a long term relationship.
 

Adhdclassic

Forum Fanatic
Mar 10, 2024
5,318
8,275
649
I'm assuming we are all single and lonely but maybe a few guys in this forum have a wife they actually care about.. quick question.. can i walk in your house, hug your wife/gf then proceed to kiss her on the lips while you just stand there and watch... can I? If so please let me know and I will be right over.. yes or no?
Hahaha. Married for 25 years any man feeling that brave I would let them know I have a shovel very big backyard 3 grown mama boys 3 elderly neighbors I have known since my children have been born. No one saw you enter my house.:devilish: I have said this in other threads I don't know how men allow someone else to play in their toy box.
 

TonyMurray

Conversation Conqueror
Apr 8, 2024
6,492
12,246
774
Just for the record and not to prolongue the debate: If any justice system would be based on this principle, everything would break down. Instead there you have a principle of intent which means knowing and doing equals responsibility.
And imagine how you would educate children based on that principle? How would this offer a child clear ethical guidance and responsibility?
Well, we're not litigating this in a court of law (thankfully)... This is a case of taking things too far to try to make a point - however, if you want to go to legal terminology, I think it would be a case of acting purposely versus acting recklessly. In acting purposely, Vivian would be fucking Christian with the knowledge that it would hurt Hutch, and that is the objective she is trying to achieve. In acting recklessly, Vivian would be fucking Christian knowing that there was a risk of Hutch finding out and being hurt by it, but she disregarded that risk. There is a difference, and that is precisely what I have been trying to say.

(Caveat: not a lawyer, but knows Google.)
 

Luc77

Active Member
Jul 15, 2022
828
892
216
English is not my language, and I have trouble determining the gender of the interlocutors here (my language is highly gendered, english - completly not)
Adhdclassic - are you woman ? :) Sparta158 ??

I am extremely curious about the interpretation of Vivian's character in the eyes of a woman
 

Adhdclassic

Forum Fanatic
Mar 10, 2024
5,318
8,275
649
English is not my language, and I have trouble determining the gender of the interlocutors here (my language is highly gendered, english - completly not)
Adhdclassic - are you woman ? :)

I am extremely curious about the interpretation of Vivian's character in the eyes of a woman
Nah guy
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Luc77

Luc77

Active Member
Jul 15, 2022
828
892
216
Are there any women here? :ROFLMAO:

Or, as usual, guys talk about how women will behave in emotional/sexual situations ?:) and we pretend to be smart, assuming we know what drives them ?
Times are changing - women like porn, but it's targeted at them
Currently, a whole branch of fantasy has emerged - womantasy
about which you can say - why kill someone if you can fuck him

When I saw what my wife was reading, I blushed. This was some real porn.
 

Sparta VI

Member
May 22, 2024
272
381
149
My wife thought the whole thing was stupid. We both agreed when she walked into the office she unknowingly already damaged her marriage.
Okay, we skipped a few little things. After the first week we agreed that Christian had blackmailed Vivian outside in the garden because he had received the information from ? that Sawyer is not the father of Hutch.
3 weeks, 140 pages and many great comments and interpretations later, I'm not sure anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adhdclassic

Dealbreaker

Active Member
May 12, 2024
952
1,073
220
There is a difference, and that is precisely what I have been trying to say.
In civil law there would be no difference, she would have to pay damages anyway. She would be responsible for cause and effect and that is the point. And I deliberately mentioned children who should know that the can't only have good intentions but have to look at the consequences.

(And I'm a guy of course)
 

TonyMurray

Conversation Conqueror
Apr 8, 2024
6,492
12,246
774
Okay, we skipped a few little things. After the first week we agreed that Christian had blackmailed Vivian outside in the garden because he had received the information from ? that Sawyer is not the father of Hutch.
3 weeks, 140 pages and many great comments and interpretations later, I'm not sure anymore.
You mean Hutch is not the father of Sawyer, of course, but no, that was never agreed - we can't agree it! It was just a speculation that someone made when trying to figure out what could have happened to result in Christian and Vivian having sex so quickly.
In civil law there would be no difference, she would have to pay damages anyway. She would be responsible for cause and effect and that is the point. And I deliberately mentioned children who should know that the can't only have good intentions but have to look at the consequences.

(And I'm a guy of course)
But it doesn't matter, because we are not in any kind of courtroom, nor are we headed there. We are just talking morals and feelings, not legal liabilities.
 

Sparta VI

Member
May 22, 2024
272
381
149
You mean Hutch is not the father of Sawyer, of course, but no, that was never agreed - we can't agree it! It was just a speculation that someone made when trying to figure out what could have happened to result in Christian and Vivian having sex so quickly.

But it doesn't matter, because we are not in any kind of courtroom, nor are we headed there. We are just talking morals and feelings, not legal liabilities.
That's right, that was our first speculation after the first playthrough, because everything went so quickly outside in the garden at the beginning. After several runs and you diligent writers, I see things differently.
 

Hattyrulz

Member
Jan 25, 2018
454
464
206
The more I think about it though, the more I guess that Vivian might have instigated it... sort of. With the tests (the kiss, the dress, the "turn up/don't turn up" to dinner), Christian has already been manipulating Vivian towards this end. He says later "the door is right there ... just leave... no one is stopping you", and also "I may have to lay off people... salesmen..." He's always just hinting, just insinuating, but not actually saying what he means, he's letting Vivian work it out for herself. That means he can technically deny ever saying it.
its clear that vivian instigated it as the SC Stories shows the scene when hutch tries to have a friendly talk but is met with stares from both vivian and christian and after that when christian leaves the room to we can see vivian deciding for herself that she has to everything to fix this. it's clearly shown by the dev. if you don't get it you have to replay it(it's a clearly showing what's gonna happen)... another aspect is if the dev was to show the dialogue in the backyard it would not have the same impact as leaving it to the reader's imagination. and the insinuation and manipulations(like you have noted) done by christian even after he knows that hutch know about then and doing what even he can to manipulate them. and the last statement deny yes but that's not what we are debating about... its if vivian humiliating hutch or not( for now she is dumb enough to think thats she is protecting which is just a excuse people tell themselves to justify they are doing).

I see her not driven by an aim to hurt but by ego, panic, interest, hubris, sense of self-importance and, yes, an underlying growing contempt against her husband. This is as always mixed with pity, trying to be helpful, protectiveness for her family etc
well put dealbreaker... this is what i meant but didn't get the point across when tony was in favor of vivian googling and giving hutch advice on how to do his job.

Vivian is trying to protect Hutch. You might not think it's the right way to do it, you might not think it's possible to do it, but she shows that it's her mindset:
"He can never know. He doesn't deserve to carry that pain. It would destroy him."
"I have to carry it for both of us... I have to!"
this can be viewed another way like you stated about the code talk .... if they don't talk about it doesn't become real.its like they have some twisted logic of love and relations which can only be understood if SC Stories took some liberties(logic breaking reasons) with that situation. if she had the foresight and understanding before she went to her husband office wouldn't it have been better(bad only for the reader). of listen even once to what hutch was telling her. as dealbreaker phrased it wonderfully i'm not gonna repeat it. if you look at the whole update you can see the parts/scenes are all interconnected and telling a logical sequence that the dev wants to tell us.since there are some unknown variable the view/theories/speculations are so varied. just to summaries...vivian is the instrument christian is using to humiliate hutch as he has done so with many other couple. now the speculation part... vivian isn't humiliating hutch at least that what she thinks ... couldn't she have googled that like she did at the start. later on.... if everything goes according to christians kinks... which is humiliating husband using the wife.... then vivian maybe a complicit in that.

In acting recklessly, Vivian would be fucking Christian knowing that there was a risk of Hutch finding out and being hurt by it, but she disregarded that risk. There is a difference, and that is precisely what I have been trying to say.

(Caveat: not a lawyer, but knows Google.)
don't see this logic at all or train of thought.... even if you are acting with purpose or recklessly... doesn't everyone think about making a decision(this is real world logic bleeding into the vn)...after having read some of the other posts .... no woman in real-life would do that to her loving husband what vivian did(that's just my view). some pointed out that vivian is the dominant one in the relationship and takes care of everything... if she did, then how did she not think about the consequence.
googling is what lead to the vn.... nice so with google everyone talks about law. like vivian thinks she can do her husbands job. nice touch there tony(y) :ROFLMAO:

PS: i have assumed most if not all of us being men.... and even posted when someone asked about what the 2 women would be talking about in the bar sneakpeek that SC Stories posted. and i seems i'm the youngest, relationship wise so i'll leave the complexities of a long relationship to better knowledgeable men.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Luc77

TheDuke9999

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2022
1,129
1,604
287
Hard disagree. It would be right to apologise and have everything in the open, but not doing it doesn't mean an absence of love or a presence of stupidity. Again, Vivian is trying to protect Hutch. You might not think it's the right way to do it, you might not think it's possible to do it, but she shows that it's her mindset:
"He can never know. He doesn't deserve to carry that pain. It would destroy him."
"I have to carry it for both of us... I have to!"


Married (and happily so) for 15 years, and of course you can't. But that has no bearing here, because I'm not Hutch and Hutch is not me.
I'm happy for you.. so what is the difference between you and Hutch then?
 

Gattsu#Struggler

Active Member
May 8, 2017
803
1,513
356
no woman in real-life would do that to her loving husband what vivian did (that's just my view). some pointed out that vivian is the dominant one in the relationship and takes care of everything
First of it's a fictional novel and any comparison with reality in any respect is absolutely out of place. This KN has the intention to entertain.

... if she did, then how did she not think about the consequence.
Oh, she did...just read Vivian's thoughts displayed throughout the game.
Even when she mentioned it to Christian, Christian reassured her by saying that Huutch is a rock.
Sometimes it's all a woman needs to hear...at least in a game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hattyrulz
4.50 star(s) 193 Votes