no they "added" arm64 and 32bit versions so they took the same game that's a demo and duplicated it 2 more times to increase the file size on the dlsite page. now it's 3 238mb .exe files of the same demo zipped together so it's 720mb
Recommending NTR, netorare, cuckold - resources, discussion, development
- Thread starter CobraPL
- Start date
- Sep 28, 2017
- 2,748
- 7,088
Why? It puts a new game on the radar and the dev is here so you can ask them questions about the game. Its a win win imo (just dont overdo it).
As for AI, there are good AI games too and I think gradually people will get better and better at it. I dont mind it at all, I would love for a lot of written erotica to get AI picutres added. You imagine it as if the alternative to the AI art was regular art, but no, for most of these game the alternative to AI art is no art and no game.
EDIT: talking about AI, I found this phone ntr game to be pretty good. Its still pretty early, but already a lot of content and the setup is nice. You get a choice of switching povs etc, but its mostly just linear so far (which I prefer) and a netorare, not netorase (though maybe eventually it will go into ntrs?).
https://f95zone.to/threads/nekontr-v0-0-6b-nekoaddict.245099/
Last edited:
- Oct 21, 2022
- 2,263
- 3,297
It seems longer when you play it release to release. Still a lot of content, but nothing too crazy.
- Oct 21, 2022
- 2,263
- 3,297
Shill means to advertise it. He is saying your posting it every possible opportunity every day is getting old.What does shill means? You called me shillinde sometimes and I'm scared because I feel it's some kind of insult
- Sep 28, 2017
- 2,748
- 7,088
- Oct 21, 2022
- 2,263
- 3,297
No, I think letting people talk about them is fine. The more devs who dip their toes in means the more chances we can get a good game eventually. AI is a fine starting point, and they can move to better art later when they are better at making games.
- Jan 21, 2019
- 242
- 602
blind hate against AI is crazy
i guess they still think AI can only be done like 2023 where you type "1girl, blonde hair" and voila
at least in my workflow, even a single character sprite has multiple passes over repaints, manual hand edits, and ADetailers.
it would have taken me at least 2, maybe 3 weeks to draw back then.
but now it can be done in 2~3 days.
not everyone is doing this, but at least don't blanket attack AI works
try to search ComfyUI, where workflows are like shader graphs in game engines.
I've said this before, but it allows technical minded people to achieve to make the game of their dreams. not everyone is creatively inclined to draw, or even financially capable to hire - or for whatever reasons they have that they can only rely on themselves.
i guess they still think AI can only be done like 2023 where you type "1girl, blonde hair" and voila
at least in my workflow, even a single character sprite has multiple passes over repaints, manual hand edits, and ADetailers.
it would have taken me at least 2, maybe 3 weeks to draw back then.
but now it can be done in 2~3 days.
not everyone is doing this, but at least don't blanket attack AI works
try to search ComfyUI, where workflows are like shader graphs in game engines.
I've said this before, but it allows technical minded people to achieve to make the game of their dreams. not everyone is creatively inclined to draw, or even financially capable to hire - or for whatever reasons they have that they can only rely on themselves.
- Jul 21, 2018
- 51
- 372
I get this idealized version of looking at "AI" games, but the reality is more like there's currently a fairly big influx of arguably pure shit games being shat out that are all largely derivative from one another. Yes. There's good AI usage out there. But fuck me there's also an endless sea of shit everytime I click the "netorare" tag.
Sure, you can argue that just letting them be and they'll get sorted/abandoned over time or improve for obvious reasons, but it can just as easily be argued we could do we a tiny little bit of quality control.
- Aug 13, 2020
- 1,143
- 755
yes there should be some quality control however the mentality of "every AI game is shit" is not good quality control it should be "this game made with AI is bad" not this game is bad BECAUSE it has AI in it" and like you said eventually it will start to balance out the shit ones will slowly fall off and be abandoned and the good ones will improve over time.
i think use of AI images should always be seen as a downside. one that could be overcome with good qualities elsewhere. but yeah, the biggest problem right now is that these games have no value in any regard. no technical competence, written competence, artistic competence, they even fail to do the one thing that AI should theoretically enable from someone bottlenecked by art, which is sheer quantity of content.
i suppose it's not actually that surprising upon further reflection that the overwhelming majority of people excited to use AI in projects like these aren't using it as a crutch to enable them to flex their creative muscles elsewhere, but as a crutch to pretend they have anything at all (or to shit out as many individual 0 star products as possible.)
frankly i don't anticipate that very many games will rise above the muck. most creatives with any talents to speak of in any of the aforementioned areas that could potentially benefit from AI art will probably prefer to commission art where possible, peel back scope, or make do with amateur illustration rather than associate themselves with the shovelware.
it's not that AI art is fundamentally worthless for the creative process, ethical questions aside, but that it self selects for talentless hacks who will then push out or drown any AI art driven project with potential.
i suppose it's not actually that surprising upon further reflection that the overwhelming majority of people excited to use AI in projects like these aren't using it as a crutch to enable them to flex their creative muscles elsewhere, but as a crutch to pretend they have anything at all (or to shit out as many individual 0 star products as possible.)
frankly i don't anticipate that very many games will rise above the muck. most creatives with any talents to speak of in any of the aforementioned areas that could potentially benefit from AI art will probably prefer to commission art where possible, peel back scope, or make do with amateur illustration rather than associate themselves with the shovelware.
it's not that AI art is fundamentally worthless for the creative process, ethical questions aside, but that it self selects for talentless hacks who will then push out or drown any AI art driven project with potential.
Last edited:
NTR Phone is a good AI game. There is clearly effort spent on the sprites and system. (Though I think the NTR could be more gradual.)
The cashgrab knockoffs are not. They are literally… just AI images pasted on to AI text. The girls are literally chameleons that shapeshift in every scene.
No one is asking for a quality czar, but a little bit of housekeeping is needed.
Maybe we should not upload the dozen (v0.1) AI games made by one dev who clearly isn't going to finish them.
If all the comments in a thread are saying "not this again," one needs to take a step back and ponder about what they’re doing.
Otherwise we get the deviantART, pinterest, and pixiv situation where the sites are dying because it’s literally become a pain browsing. Blanket -AI filter helps a lot, but this also means AI games with thought put into it, melantha, would be filtered out as well.
A lot of "AI artists" purposefully not tagging their shit also means a minimum level of human stewardship is needed.
We need some common sense QC otherwise human (and devs who use AI thoughtfully) are going to suffer from being flooded out by AI cashgrabs.
Speaking of NTR, I found Fault Broken Promises quite compelling. Blonde twintails are my downfall lmao.
Great art and the scenes were hot. It also has corruption meter which I like.
Wish the “main couple” interacted more, but the tsundere's (reluctant) reactions toward the HB are nice.
Pretend the battle content doesn't exist, because it literally should not.
Sister was ironically
Great art and the scenes were hot. It also has corruption meter which I like.
You must be registered to see the links
Wish the “main couple” interacted more, but the tsundere's (reluctant) reactions toward the HB are nice.
Pretend the battle content doesn't exist, because it literally should not.
Sister was ironically
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
this game had good scenes. i actually liked the sister's scene best of all, though it could have done with a liiittle build up to show how curious she was about sex (beyond her stat page hinting at it). unfortunately very tedious to play for its short runtime, no sandbox mystery ntr content despite the structure of the game very much inviting those kinds of scenes, and yeah basically zilch in terms of character interaction makes it feel hollow.
- May 14, 2023
- 30
- 94
That is a really shitty thing to say, you say "the overwhelming majority of people" using AI to create for example ren'py games are worthless.
- Have you ever thought of that maybe, just maybe the reason is that the amount of people actually capable of creating digital art (or acquiring FOR FREE) that is even close to the quality of what you can get with AI generation in 2025 is close to zero. Or I would even go as far as to claim zero, nobody is "working for exposure" with digital art, programmers however...
- Have you ever thought of that there might a big portion of people WANTING to create a novel or game, capable of simple programming, capable of writing, but NOT capable of creating +$500 content of QUALITY art?
- Have you ever thought of that these people might want to be in control of what is going on in the scenes on a more personal level rather than trying to explain to someone else what they want.
- Have you thought of maybe, just maybe creating 3 scenes with about 50 images only takes a few days or less is preferable for these people (me included).
- Maybe, most of these game creators do not HAVE the funds to pay someone else to create art for a novel or game they do not expect to make any money from themselves.
You are just assuming there are no talented writers out there using ai, or rather "the overwhelming majority of people".
I get that digital artists are pissed at AI becoming a reality, but if those same artists start pissing up the wind, attacking anybody that even glances towards AI to create something, well, they will soon find out pee is wet, gets cold, and empathy goes out the door pretty fast... (I'm not saying YOU are an artist, but you parrot the same thing I hear some artists say)
I also find it VERY strange that using free mega-titted assets in free 3d programs is fine, but doing the same with an ai is a big nono.
I have a feeling the reaction towards AI is because people actually are capable of creating something of quality, not just something that looks like tomb rider game from early 2000, and that is a treat to digital artist unlike renders that look like a ps1 game.
Edit:
I am talking about free assets here, not payed or manually crafted like the game above in this thread, witch looks fkn awesome btw!
Last edited:
- Aug 13, 2020
- 1,143
- 755
i dont disagree with anything you said because you're just reinforcing my point we dont need a quality czar i agree but we should filter out as much as we can without painting with a wide brush of "all AI work is bad work", also there are other factors as to why pixiv and those other sites are dying besides the one you stated. theyre dying being these sights have established incredibly draconian rules in regards to what can be posted there moreso on the side of pixiv than deviant art but my point stands, deviant art has been going down in quality for years as newer and more convenient platforms arise and they refuse or cant inovate and improve their site so they fell behind.
Let's be honest though. If AI games made zero bank, perhaps artists wouldn't care (too much).
But they do. A lot make crazy bank because the average person doesn't actually care about "soul" but what looks GOOD.
And AI art looks amazing, too amazing. To the point that even great artists like Mignon get their art mistaken for AI.
So I know a few artists, they make god-tier works. But they work damn hard, to the point of health issues.
They don't mind sacrificing for their passion, but then they see this.
And you can see why they get salty. No, not just the ludicrous amount of money or because it looks great. (Which it does.)
This is only possible because it was trained on the art of millions of artists.
Steal from one person, you are a criminal. Steal from millions, and you are treated as a savior.
If artists were paid royalties (like Disney is), then it would be less of an issue (though still one). But they aren't because AI is made by big companies, and big companies will never pay when they can get away with it. So big tech wins, the “AI creators” win, but the artists are left out to dry when it’s their art that made the technology possible.
Moreover, AI tech is very unscrupulous in how it trains data, Meta was recently caught using pirated content to train its AI, and many AI companies remain tight-lipped about where they source their models. Pinterest has an "auto opt-in" option where any content you upload is immediately eligible for AI processing, regardless of its source.
The fact that Disney can force AI companies to "opt out" their characters while individual artists can't, really shows how bullshit the ethics can be.
I think this will be my last post on AI in a while. Just wanted to let you know why artists get so salty about AI. It's not so much about the fact that people can make great art fast, but how the tech came to be. The tech trained on their data and instead of being rewarded for it, their livelihoods are threatened instead.
But they do. A lot make crazy bank because the average person doesn't actually care about "soul" but what looks GOOD.
And AI art looks amazing, too amazing. To the point that even great artists like Mignon get their art mistaken for AI.
So I know a few artists, they make god-tier works. But they work damn hard, to the point of health issues.
They don't mind sacrificing for their passion, but then they see this.
And you can see why they get salty. No, not just the ludicrous amount of money or because it looks great. (Which it does.)
This is only possible because it was trained on the art of millions of artists.
Steal from one person, you are a criminal. Steal from millions, and you are treated as a savior.
If artists were paid royalties (like Disney is), then it would be less of an issue (though still one). But they aren't because AI is made by big companies, and big companies will never pay when they can get away with it. So big tech wins, the “AI creators” win, but the artists are left out to dry when it’s their art that made the technology possible.
Moreover, AI tech is very unscrupulous in how it trains data, Meta was recently caught using pirated content to train its AI, and many AI companies remain tight-lipped about where they source their models. Pinterest has an "auto opt-in" option where any content you upload is immediately eligible for AI processing, regardless of its source.
The fact that Disney can force AI companies to "opt out" their characters while individual artists can't, really shows how bullshit the ethics can be.
I think this will be my last post on AI in a while. Just wanted to let you know why artists get so salty about AI. It's not so much about the fact that people can make great art fast, but how the tech came to be. The tech trained on their data and instead of being rewarded for it, their livelihoods are threatened instead.
Well, that's a whole other can of worms.
But in regards to AI, it's a bit of a conundrum, because when is it too much? Just slop? How to define slop? It's a bit like fetish content. I don't like scat, but it doesn't mean I want it gone, just properly tagged. Malicious actors will always exist, but that's what can be done.
But AI art tends to use the same-y style, either the generic one, or that one korean look one, or the babyface one. There isn't really that much variation on public mass generated stuff.