Stan is the type to say "m'lady" 100% unironicallyNo... Hell no... Perry knows how to interact with girls and he can get with Emma and apparently soon also Cherry...
Stan... I tried, but no I just can't! He's just way too cringes that I don't even want to continue the Stan route
View attachment 2685346 View attachment 2685347
The jungle fever fever is strong in the ORAS community
Just gonna ignore the fact that Mike is in a relationship so he is a cheater? That is a huge downside to him as a person. Lena knows this so engaging with him makes her a cheater as well.Conclusions: most of Eva's audience wants to get BLACK'D.
Still, I would put Mike in the first place from this list, he has no pronounced negative sides. He is part of the Lena slut route, but unlike Axel, he is not a psychopathic stalker, not a notorious asshole and loser Robert, not a blackmailer Seymour.
Most of the male characters have strong negative sides, but Mike doesn't seem to have any - he's just a confident guy who wants to have fun with a hot girl. When Lena brings Ian to the club, what does Mike do? He's cool with it, no drama. He needs character development, and we saw the first hints of this in Chapter 10.
Doesn't seem like he is the one being cucked in the image, just sayin'
I've already responded to exactly the same comment, but I'll repeat it. You're talking to the man who steals Cindy from Wade.
Come on, have you never been in a serious relationship and had an opportunity with a hot girl and obviously went for it ? I was very much in love in a couple of serious relationships, still never turned down a hot girl giving me a hint. Most of us would do the same as Mike, let's be honest.
Yeah, is not like integrity, reliability and trust have any value when commiting to a long term relationship to build a partnership and family, right?
Some of us are not animals who lack control of their basest instincts.
Wow, you are an A-Grade A-hole...
Well ,if you dont mind your gfs getting hit by a hot stud who hinted on railing her then you are good in my book.
It has nothing to do with being a puritan. A monogamous relationship is like a contract and you are a dishonest piece of shit if you break it. Only dishonest people break their words, and it reflects on all aspects of life.
People need to learn to separate games from real life. I frequently shoot people in games, but I would never shoot someone in real life. If you want to cheat on your partner in a game, well, it's just a game, but if you cheat in RL, you are indeed a complete asshole.
Comes down to a few things.
Tl;dr:
Polls and surveys over the years have found that sexual infidelity (cheating) is quite common. I've also been in a position where I was in a committed relationship and found myself propositioned by other women and if they're really hot it is indeed extremely difficult to turn down. All you people here being so scandalized by that are either exceptionally righteous or you've simply never experienced genuine temptation because no woman has ever offered herself up. All I can say for myself is that one of the nice things about getting older is that it has become easier to overrule my dick and, frankly, there are a lot fewer women interested.
"Heh you think cheating is wrong? Well based on my highly specific set of circumstances where I saw men cheat in an environment where the men are predisposed to cheat, means that I can comfortably make negative assumptions on your character and your relationship status. I am very smart."
Not anyone else. Someone as hot as Lena. And I am quite certain most puritans here would give in to Lena.
Using terminology like "puritans" implies not cheating as some sort of high standard to be strived for and not the baseline for a relationship. If you can't even meet the basic standard of being not unfaithful that's on you, but don't try to drag everyone else down to your level.
Yes that's what he said: the best way to not cheat is to never be tempted.
