PervySageKem

Member
Apr 12, 2020
467
632
I wouldn't mind another GGGB tbh. With a different girl and a different setting, the possibilities are endless.
Yeah, GGGB was great. The big thing it did right was putting the readers focus on the female protagonist. It makes you feel more freedom of choice, you can pick anything you desire and test out everything.

When there are two MCs, it's really hard not to take the male MCs point of view as the main one (if you are male, of course). It makes you feel weird about choosing certain things for the female MC, considereing she's your own main love interest.

More games should follow GGGB's blueprint.
 

Vernalcash

Newbie
May 20, 2017
99
418
This comment, written in a way more polite and not offensive way, was censored dozens of times by the mods because a few intolerant SJW apprentices in this forum with cero respect for other's people opinions decided report it. Of course, after insulting me very badly. And then, they made me banned by the mods, and even bragged about it. CANCEL CULTURE IN A FUCKING FORUM OF PIRATED PORN GAMES.

Well, fuck them all. Now they are going to see this fucking comment, written in the most offensive way, until everybody here gets literally sick of it. Until they throw up. Everybody thank Achedcroissant, Heycock and a few more pathetic SJW for that.

CANCEL CULTURE IN ZONE F95 AND MAYA THE LESBIAN CLICHÉ: A PATHETIC FANTASY FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS


Maya, the lesbian character oppressed by her white, middle aged, heterosexual religious-conservative father is, obviously, a cliché in western countries in XXI century. The homosexual person as a victim "by default" of the "prejudices of conservative society" as is depicted in modern pop culture (movies, TV shows and series, videogames, etc.) is, again, just a cliché imposed by the power of the gay lobby to the entertainment industry. The objective is to get society to see all homosexuals as victims, and therefore worthy of special privileges and possessors of moral superiority. The "progressive" political parties support that gay lobby in exchange of votes, and the gay lobby supports those political parties in exchange of public money, privileges and power.

I don´t think that Dr. PinkCake is being controlled by the lobby gay, obviously, but he´s into that mainstream thinking and that´s why all his homosexual characters (Maya and Chad) are victims in this game. Also, apparently, the player should feel sympathy for them just because they are homosexual, even if they both are awful characters.

Chad is a terrible person that makes her girlfriend´s life miserable for a long time, and even physically assaults the Main Character in the middle of the night. But both Sage and the Main Character, apparently, should be worried about him and his secret. A secret that, in real life in a US college, nobody would actually care about (again, the "victim" gay cliché)

Maya is a drama queen that, after lying and tricking the main character for their own selfish purposes, emotionally manipulates him to get his help. Because she´s not able to take care of her own problems. And DPC pretends that the player must feel OK with that and accept that, even if the Main Character is not romantically interested in her anymore, he must be her best friend and allow her to drag him into her problems. It makes the Main Character not a good person, but a fucking emotional hostage of Maya. As a player, you have to be very stupid to feel sympathy and empathy for characters like those.

There are only two reasons to follow Maya´s path:

1. Maya has a cute 3D model. That’s all. Some people don´t care about the character´s personality. Only see a cute face and a good body.

2. To be a pathetic Social Justice Warrior that gets his little prick hard (if a SJW can get his prick hard, which is highly doubtful) with the fantasy of being the "hero" of a lesbian by pissing off a white, heterosexual middle aged conservative man (the evil for the gay lobby and those pathetic SJW) and being accepted into her relationship as a lame third wheel.

I know that some members here are going to make this comment to be censored: achedcroissant, Heycock and a few others. They are the SJW in this forum, playing petty cancel culture, and making lobby to make the mods censor the comments that they don´t like because aren´t progressive enough. Now, I don’t fucking care if I offend somebody. They all can lick my ass. Also, the rest of the users of this thread that, instead of coming out against the culture of cancellation on a fucking porn game forum because of half a dozen "SJWs," agree to be censored and write only comments authorized by Achedcroissant, Heycock and the other SJW, so they can keep talking about boobs. None of you deserve that this thread of BaDIK continues open. FUCK YOU ALL TOO.

View attachment 1601672
Buddy this is not the being a dik thread, you are lost
 

PervySageKem

Member
Apr 12, 2020
467
632
Buddy this is not the being a dik thread, you are lost
I was thinking the same thing, ahahah! Dude took a wrong turn!

I guess he's right that getting the player invested in characters that are then stolen away by plot device is a really shitty move from a dev (that's why I dropped that game and never touched it again), but move on man xD
 
  • Haha
Reactions: monk_56

BloodyMares

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2017
1,458
7,018
The main difference between GGGB and ORS is that most of the characters have lives and interact with each other when you don't look. Perry gets close to Cherry, Cindy seems to lose her guard around Axel the longer they work together, Ivy still talks to Axel, Alison and Jeremy have this mutual attraction that constantly threatens and tests Ian's relationship with her, and then liberated Holly getting very close to Ivy. All of those are consequences for the choices players make. The only character in GGGB who had as many consequences was Eva. If Ash acts slutty early on, thus getting Jack's attention, then she will stay good. Otherwise, she can spiral out of control, having similarly shocking outcomes, like hooking up with Jack on the second day, deciding it's okay to cheat on her loving boyfriend, then she can get hooked up with the gang, or she can remain the good girlfriend, or she can become a BBC slut, etc. All outcomes first come as surprises and seemingly out of nowhere, but all of that was decided by the butterfly effect that us set in motion by making particular choices. If you're not understanding of Eva, you can lose her as a friend. She had her own feelings. Similarly, ORS characters all have their own personalities and expectations of Ian/Lena. It's up to you if you want to satisfy those expectations and invest fully in the relationships, or if you want to lead everyone on and naturally end up in trouble.

Ian has so many negative consequences early on because all of the girls he messes with know each other in some capacity. It's not the same for Lena. Ian has a better chance to hook up with several girls and them being understanding of it (like Emma and Cherry). Lena on the other hand was so lucky because none of the guys knew each other. It changed in Chapter 7 when Ian and Robert were properly introduced. By messing with Jeremy, she compromised her chances to become Ian's girlfriend. Who knows what other conflicts might await her further. They will come, just when she expands her friend group with people who also know each other. Axel says he's over her, but I suspect if they get back together, he would demand that she cuts all ties with other guys because he wants to own her completely. To become HIS slut, not everyone else's behind his back. If he's to share her, it would be on his terms with the person of his choice at the place and time of his choice.
 

Solomon Grundy

Active Member
Nov 25, 2021
553
1,344
This comment, written in a way more polite and not offensive way, was censored dozens of times by the mods because a few intolerant SJW apprentices in this forum with cero respect for other's people opinions decided report it. Of course, after insulting me very badly. And then, they made me banned by the mods, and even bragged about it. CANCEL CULTURE IN A FUCKING FORUM OF PIRATED PORN GAMES.

Well, fuck them all. Now they are going to see this fucking comment, written in the most offensive way, until everybody here gets literally sick of it. Until they throw up. Everybody thank Achedcroissant, Heycock and a few more pathetic SJW for that.

CANCEL CULTURE IN ZONE F95 AND MAYA THE LESBIAN CLICHÉ: A PATHETIC FANTASY FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS


Maya, the lesbian character oppressed by her white, middle aged, heterosexual religious-conservative father is, obviously, a cliché in western countries in XXI century. The homosexual person as a victim "by default" of the "prejudices of conservative society" as is depicted in modern pop culture (movies, TV shows and series, videogames, etc.) is, again, just a cliché imposed by the power of the gay lobby to the entertainment industry. The objective is to get society to see all homosexuals as victims, and therefore worthy of special privileges and possessors of moral superiority. The "progressive" political parties support that gay lobby in exchange of votes, and the gay lobby supports those political parties in exchange of public money, privileges and power.

I don´t think that Dr. PinkCake is being controlled by the lobby gay, obviously, but he´s into that mainstream thinking and that´s why all his homosexual characters (Maya and Chad) are victims in this game. Also, apparently, the player should feel sympathy for them just because they are homosexual, even if they both are awful characters.

Chad is a terrible person that makes her girlfriend´s life miserable for a long time, and even physically assaults the Main Character in the middle of the night. But both Sage and the Main Character, apparently, should be worried about him and his secret. A secret that, in real life in a US college, nobody would actually care about (again, the "victim" gay cliché)

Maya is a drama queen that, after lying and tricking the main character for their own selfish purposes, emotionally manipulates him to get his help. Because she´s not able to take care of her own problems. And DPC pretends that the player must feel OK with that and accept that, even if the Main Character is not romantically interested in her anymore, he must be her best friend and allow her to drag him into her problems. It makes the Main Character not a good person, but a fucking emotional hostage of Maya. As a player, you have to be very stupid to feel sympathy and empathy for characters like those.

There are only two reasons to follow Maya´s path:

1. Maya has a cute 3D model. That’s all. Some people don´t care about the character´s personality. Only see a cute face and a good body.

2. To be a pathetic Social Justice Warrior that gets his little prick hard (if a SJW can get his prick hard, which is highly doubtful) with the fantasy of being the "hero" of a lesbian by pissing off a white, heterosexual middle aged conservative man (the evil for the gay lobby and those pathetic SJW) and being accepted into her relationship as a lame third wheel.

I know that some members here are going to make this comment to be censored: achedcroissant, Heycock and a few others. They are the SJW in this forum, playing petty cancel culture, and making lobby to make the mods censor the comments that they don´t like because aren´t progressive enough. Now, I don’t fucking care if I offend somebody. They all can lick my ass. Also, the rest of the users of this thread that, instead of coming out against the culture of cancellation on a fucking porn game forum because of half a dozen "SJWs," agree to be censored and write only comments authorized by Achedcroissant, Heycock and the other SJW, so they can keep talking about boobs. None of you deserve that this thread of BaDIK continues open. FUCK YOU ALL TOO.

View attachment 1601672
 

PervySageKem

Member
Apr 12, 2020
467
632
The main difference between GGGB and ORS is that most of the characters have lives and interact with each other when you don't look. Perry gets close to Cherry, Cindy seems to lose her guard around Axel the longer they work together, Ivy still talks to Axel, Alison and Jeremy have this mutual attraction that constantly threatens and tests Ian's relationship with her, and then liberated Holly getting very close to Ivy. All of those are consequences for the choices players make. The only character in GGGB who had as many consequences was Eva. If Ash acts slutty early on, thus getting Jack's attention, then she will stay good. Otherwise, she can spiral out of control, having similarly shocking outcomes, like hooking up with Jack on the second day, deciding it's okay to cheat on her loving boyfriend, then she can get hooked up with the gang, or she can remain the good girlfriend, or she can become a BBC slut, etc. All outcomes first come as surprises and seemingly out of nowhere, but all of that was decided by the butterfly effect that us set in motion by making particular choices. If you're not understanding of Eva, you can lose her as a friend. She had her own feelings. Similarly, ORS characters all have their own personalities and expectations of Ian/Lena. It's up to you if you want to satisfy those expectations and invest fully in the relationships, or if you want to lead everyone on and naturally end up in trouble.

Ian has so many negative consequences early on because all of the girls he messes with know each other in some capacity. It's not the same for Lena. Ian has a better chance to hook up with several girls and them being understanding of it (like Emma and Cherry). Lena on the other hand was so lucky because none of the guys knew each other. It changed in Chapter 7 when Ian and Robert were properly introduced. By messing with Jeremy, she compromised her chances to become Ian's girlfriend. Who knows what other conflicts might await her further. They will come, just when she expands her friend group with people who also know each other. Axel says he's over her, but I suspect if they get back together, he would demand that she cuts all ties with other guys because he wants to own her completely. To become HIS slut, not everyone else's behind his back. If he's to share her, it would be on his terms with the person of his choice at the place and time of his choice.
Yeah, but it's a lot more tense in ORS. In GGGB sure, Eva can go Bad or stay Good, but that's pretty easy to manipulate and you can always end the game with her being your sexfriend while maintaining a relationship with someone else.

In ORS it feels that if you drop the ball for a single second every guy will fuck the girls you are interested in IMMEDIATELY, with no chance of stopping it. It creates a much more stressful gameplay, I feel like I need to read the Walkthrough for 20 minutes before every choice.

It's pretty unfair how you are supposed to basically ignore 90% of the content if you want to have a loving relationship with someone. Why can Lena fuck around but Ian can't? I think the game would be much more enjoyable if people weren't so hateful on Harem/Polyamory paths.
 

PervySageKem

Member
Apr 12, 2020
467
632
Guys, it looks like our spanking work! Eva kiss finally updated her Patreon for news. I know waiting will be tough for you guys, Nowadays I am very busy with my job and family but this thread and Summer's gone are my favorites, And in my spare time, I will create some funny pictures for you guys. I will appreciate it very much if you guys liked my post, follow Eva, and give donations to a Church. Just kidding. Guy's stay safe as well and F word for C or Omni VIRUS.


Wishes of Perverts of f95zone!

View attachment 1601765


This picture is for All Alison's lovers. In this ending Lena is with Holly only, and Alison is married to our boy Ian and had two of his kids, One baby girl named Layla and another baby boy named Parker. They are living a very happy and fulfilled life. They both deeply love their children and each other as well. While Jermy didn't get to touch Alison even once in this ending and besides he has his hands to satisfy himself plenty.


View attachment 1601766
This is a pretty aggressive response man.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Homemade
Nov 15, 2020
418
1,882
Axel says he's over her, but I suspect if they get back together, he would demand that she cuts all ties with other guys because he wants to own her completely. To become HIS slut, not everyone else's behind his back. If he's to share her, it would be on his terms with the person of his choice at the place and time of his choice.
Yeah, I doubt he’s telling the truth when he claims he’s over her. He’s been trying the obsessive ex-boyfriend tactic for a while without success, so acting disinterested to lure her back in seems a logical next step. Even if he’s over her, I can’t see him accepting being Lena’s side piece. And if he is in fact over her, I think there’s even bigger reasons to doubt his motives and the reasons for his involvement with Seymour and Ivy.


It's pretty unfair how you are supposed to basically ignore 90% of the content if you want to have a loving relationship with someone. Why can Lena fuck around but Ian can't? I think the game would be much more enjoyable if people weren't so hateful on Harem/Polyamory paths.
It’s obviously legitimate to prefer games where there’s less consequences and you’re not locked out of routes to the same extent as with ORS. But ORS is meant to be realistic, so the fact that you have to "ignore 90 % of the content if you want to have a loving relationship with someone" is simply because that’s the way it is in real life; you can either sleep around, or decide you want a loving relationship with someone, meaning you’ll stop sleeping around (or at least you should).

I think 90 percent is a pretty big exaggeration as well — up until now Ian can sleep with Alison, Cherry, Emma, Cindy and Minerva, and still be able to enter a relationship with Lena — and it can be a relationship where they even decide to experiment together. It’s too early to tell exactly what limitations there’ll be in loving relationships with the others. But while some cheating is bound to cause trouble, I’ll bet it’ll be possible to cheat and get away with it as well — even for Ian. And the Lena/Ian/Holly throuple still looks likely too.
 

PervySageKem

Member
Apr 12, 2020
467
632
Yeah, I doubt he’s telling the truth when he claims he’s over her. He’s been trying the obsessive ex-boyfriend tactic for a while without success, so acting disinterested to lure her back in seems a logical next step. Even if he’s over her, I can’t see him accepting being Lena’s side piece. And if he is in fact over her, I think there’s even bigger reasons to doubt his motives and the reasons for his involvement with Seymour and Ivy.

It’s obviously legitimate to prefer games where there’s less consequences and you’re not locked out of routes to the same extent as with ORS. But ORS is meant to be realistic, so the fact that you have to "ignore 90 % of the content if you want to have a loving relationship with someone" is simply because that’s the way it is in real life; you can either sleep around, or decide you want a loving relationship with someone, meaning you’ll stop sleeping around (or at least you should).

I think 90 percent is a pretty big exaggeration as well — up until now Ian can sleep with Alison, Cherry, Emma, Cindy and Minerva, and still be able to enter a relationship with Lena — and it can be a relationship where they even decide to experiment together. It’s too early to tell exactly what limitations there’ll be in loving relationships with the others. But while some cheating is bound to cause trouble, I’ll bet it’ll be possible to cheat and get away with it as well — even for Ian. And the Lena/Ian/Holly throuple still looks likely too.
You are right, I am exaggerating with the percentage ahahah! it's just that these games due tend to have really bad consequences if you take a wrong step too enjoy some of the content. The relationship with Cindy could get really emotional and romantic (at least I hope it can, I'm still in chapter 6), but it would have consequences with Lena (maybe not?).

Why is the throuple okay with Holly but not Cindy? I'm not criticizing, I just tend to get torn in EVERY GAME between two incompatible love interests... I'm either unlucky or devs think it's asking for too much to have two loving relationships.

I get the whole "realistic angle", but I never beleive in that justification. These stories are always larger than life, it's not realistic for a guy to suddenly talk two times with a girl and fuck her. It's not realistic to fuck the Boss when you are about to get fired for being a complete jackass. Yet these things happen...

All I'm saying is I would love it if games with multiple love interests would give us more chances for a more relaxed polyamory experience.
 
Nov 15, 2020
418
1,882
You are right, I am exaggerating with the percentage ahahah! it's just that these games due tend to have really bad consequences if you take a wrong step too enjoy some of the content. The relationship with Cindy could get really emotional and romantic (at least I hope it can, I'm still in chapter 6), but it would have consequences with Lena (maybe not?).

Why is the throuple okay with Holly but not Cindy? I'm not criticizing, I just tend to get torn in EVERY GAME between two incompatible love interests... I'm either unlucky or devs think it's asking for too much to have two loving relationships.

I get the whole "realistic angle", but I never beleive in that justification. These stories are always larger than life, it's not realistic for a guy to suddenly talk two times with a girl and fuck her. It's not realistic to fuck the Boss when you are about to get fired for being a complete jackass. Yet these things happen...

All I'm saying is I would love it if games with multiple love interests would give us more chances for a more relaxed polyamory experience.
Just my opinion obviously, but Cindy as a person seems less likely to accept sharing a guy with someone else. Holly admires Lena, while Cindy seems to feel threatened by her. And Holly and Lena are already friends. So I think the relationship between those two and Ian stands out as more compatible with a polyamorous relationship than anyone else. But I think there’ll be several Cindy paths, both romantical and not, that we can look forward to.

And who knows, maybe some other similar options like Holly/Lena/Ian will emerge later in the game, as the relationships between the characters continue to progress? Emma and Lena are starting to get to know each other, and while Emma doesn’t seem to be interested in a relationship, I suspect she’s one of the persons Ian and Lena can have fun with together in the coming chapters. A couple instead of a throuple, but with one or a few persons they regularly invite into their bedroom for some fun — that could be pretty wholesome too.
 

monk_56

Active Member
Apr 26, 2021
656
2,663
Just my opinion obviously, but Cindy as a person seems less likely to accept sharing a guy with someone else. Holly admires Lena, while Cindy seems to feel threatened by her. And Holly and Lena are already friends. So I think the relationship between those two and Ian stands out as more compatible with a polyamorous relationship than anyone else. But I think there’ll be several Cindy paths, both romantical and not, that we can look forward to.

And who knows, maybe some other similar options as Holly/Lena/Ian will emerge later in the game, as the relationships between the characters continue to progress? Emma and Lena are starting to get to know each other, and while Emma doesn’t seem to be a interested in a relationship, I suspect she’s one of the persons Ian and Lena can have fun with together in the coming chapters. A couple instead of a throuple, but with one or a few persons they regularly invite into their bedroom for some fun — that could be pretty wholesome too.
Cindy does not feel destined for Poly relations.

Lena x Holly x Ian is the definite pathing.

Louise would also Kamakazi on the chance to be a throuple with Ian and Lena I bet- maybe b/t the two of them they could give her enough attention to sate her neuroticism.

I can also see Emma changing her tune on relationships (particularly if it were an open relationship) if the right people rolled up- Ian and Lena have a lot to offer as a couple to another partner.
 

PervySageKem

Member
Apr 12, 2020
467
632
Just my opinion obviously, but Cindy as a person seems less likely to accept sharing a guy with someone else. Holly admires Lena, while Cindy seems to feel threatened by her. And Holly and Lena are already friends. So I think the relationship between those two and Ian stands out as more compatible with a polyamorous relationship than anyone else. But I think there’ll be several Cindy paths, both romantical and not, that we can look forward to.

And who knows, maybe some other similar options like Holly/Lena/Ian will emerge later in the game, as the relationships between the characters continue to progress? Emma and Lena are starting to get to know each other, and while Emma doesn’t seem to be interested in a relationship, I suspect she’s one of the persons Ian and Lena can have fun with together in the coming chapters. A couple instead of a throuple, but with one or a few persons they regularly invite into their bedroom for some fun — that could be pretty wholesome too.
I agree with you there. A couple that can have a few people they also like. Im not into the throuple angle because it seems like Lena is just "adopting a stray cat" and bringing her to bad. Not my cup of tea, Id rather Holly find her own place.
 
Nov 15, 2020
418
1,882
Cindy does not feel destined for Poly relations.

Lena x Holly x Ian is the definite pathing.

Louise would also Kamakazi on the chance to be a throuple with Ian and Lena I bet- maybe b/t the two of them they could give her enough attention to sate her neuroticism.

I can also see Emma changing her tune on relationships (particularly if it were an open relationship) if the right people rolled up- Ian and Lena have a lot to offer as a couple to another partner.
Yeah, and with Emma it will probably also be very deciding whether you side with Seymour or not. If Lena, Ian or both are working together with Seymour, she’ll hate them; but if they don’t, and instead team up with Emma to take him down, I think that would be a big leap towards becoming "the right people" in her book.

I don’t think she’d say no to a deal where they work together to bring down Seymour during the daytime, and then move to the bedroom and forget about him every evening ;)
 

jaylop09

Newbie
Nov 24, 2019
81
278
I honestly don't think the rework will take so much time, as I read here some people suggesting it will be done in fall. Probably one of the things that Eva wants with this rework is giving her base something new in near future while she gains time for the next chapter which is clearly giving her headaches. So, If i would have to bet, probably mid spring for the rework and late fall for ch10
 

PervySageKem

Member
Apr 12, 2020
467
632
I honestly don't think the rework will take so much time, as I read here some people suggesting it will be done in fall. Probably one of the things that Eva wants with this rework is giving her base something new in near future while she gains time for the next chapter which is clearly giving her headaches. So, If i would have to bet, probably mid spring for the rework and late fall for ch10
Late fall for the next chapter? What?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pavlogrk

jaylop09

Newbie
Nov 24, 2019
81
278
Late fall for the next chapter? What?
Safe bet. It seems she has stumbled upon a wall with following chapters so nothing makes us to expect it before June. So maybe late fall, maybe early... In reality it's absurd to predict it if we don't even have an estimated date for the rework
 
Nov 15, 2020
418
1,882
I like to think that Ian will have the opportunity to become a sort of sidekick for Seymour and beat Axel on this field as well.
I'd like that too. I'm also wondering to what extent Ian can get involved with Seymour of his own choice, or whether it will continue to depend on Lena's choices. She's obviously the main victim of Seymour's blackmail in chapter 9, but at least she gets to choose if she wants to go through with it or not. In one of the scenarios Ian risks having his career destroyed, and in the other he'll seemingly stay on Seymour's good side — but Lena becomes his private model (which is obviously worse if Ian and Lena are romantically involved). And everything is out of his hands — he doesn't even know about it yet.

I'm guessing he'll get the chance to get a closer bond to Seymour if Lena works with him, but that would be a really weird deal if he's already romantically involved with Lena. And in the long run Seymour probably won't accept that Lena is with someone else either. He'll want her for himself, just like Axel does.

Hopefully Ian will also get a similar chance even if Lena turns down Seymour, giving him more agency on Seymour's side of the story. And it would've been a nice twist as well — Lena already having turned Seymour down and made it clear to Ian what a shady guy he is, but Ian still choosing to go behind her and Emma's back and taking whatever offer Seymour might have for him.
 
4.60 star(s) 313 Votes