I think it's safe to say that Holly was at least shy about her appearance, and that's why she's dressing the way she is when at low change:
I mean, if Ian was a real Chadington Buffworth IV he'd get her a collar that said "Slut #1" or another number depending on how he'd rank his bitches.INB4 we find out the necklet chad Ian buys for Holly spells "CUMEATER".
It's understandable I guess these things happen so when "you're ready they will be too", right?
Why would they need to wrap up quick? Why would they need a complete overhaul? Why would they need to do anything you say?
Who is most people? Like do you have any evidence that most people are over it?
I'm not talking about patreon numbers. I said most people are over expecting a good release schedule for the game.
EK keeps getting distracted from Marcel's cock. EK just can't stop jacking off from the BBC.GGGB: one month
ORS: one year
How could it have come to this, Eva?!
EK doenst really has to change anything,her "IM FOCUSING/STRUGGLING WITH THE WRITING" is tiring through,she literally has one excuse that she uses everytime.
If the current workflow/process is not sustainable (and her apologies in the status updates seem to indicate as much) something needs to change. While this forum isn't a clear metric for user feedback/responses, I would argue simply based on views and replies as well as high chance that a lot of patrons came from this forum, it is a good indicator.
They don't as I said, that is the problem because EK can coast on the current number of patrons who go along the slowing release schedule. In fact that is exactly my point, there is incentive to not stive for a faster, more consistent workflow since it obviously doesn't matter financially. You can see that with a lot of creators on most platforms once you hit a certain number of followers a subset of them will basically forget that they pay. Just look at the projects that haven't even given a status update in years and still have dozens and dozens of paying patrons.
I mean I guess... the patrons clearly don't have a lot of problems with it. So...
I mean I guess...if you fail to understand an argument/opinion...then yes you are bound to be wrong. So...
Whatever makes you happy (I do understand the opinion, but whatever), couldn't be bothered to argue with randoms.
"Most people are over expecting prompt delivery of the game" is such bizarre/specific thing to whine about that the "it" which you actually used in your post was reasonably interpreted as referring to the game itself. Because that's generally what people mean when they talk how "someone is over it".
EK's reports indicate the progress is slow, which is not surprising for the stage of the story she's currently writing, but i think "not sustainable" is only your own take on it. One that's largely fueled by simple and understandable desire of just wanting to get multiple games to play at rapid pace (instead of having to wait for one to wrap up) and little more than that.
Again that's why there need to be some radical (in the basic meaning of the word) changes. If you remember the last year (maybe half a year) of GGGB it was pretty similar. The updates already indicated that EK had issues trying to navigate the overlapping paths and variables. Therefore the ending was somewhat rushed without exploring the interesting aspects that opened up at the end of that game.
is emblematic of this larger problem. At the end of the day it is EK decision, as you said "my own take on it" is that I would rather have consistent updates every three months even if that means a small dip in complexity/quality instead of two updates per year at best (because this is where they are headed).
I'm not into feet, but I think Holly could be a great feet slut. Great image!
