- Dec 18, 2019
- 107
- 272
Of course lol. In my playthrough, lena is pure and in love with ian, supports emma's view, etc, that is until Seymour came and corrupt her. Pretty hot ngl.Bloody degenerate! You actually liked the hand holding didn't you
Of course lol. In my playthrough, lena is pure and in love with ian, supports emma's view, etc, that is until Seymour came and corrupt her. Pretty hot ngl.Bloody degenerate! You actually liked the hand holding didn't you
I definitely liked the Seymour update, as most likely did most Seymour-Lena fans.The hate seems to come mainly from several subsets of fans, who are unable to see the possibilities of not only the Seymour routes, but the Holly, Alison and several Ian toutes also.
The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.What's wrong with seymour update? it's great. Don't kinkshame people lol, it's a corruption fantasy to bait innocent woman with money and hedonism. Especially if it's Emma.
A clear example of this archetype is John from A Mother's Love, where he is vile and a proper antagonist.The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.
Seymour was introduced as a mysterious, enigmatic, sinister man, whose "love" towards Lena is extremely dubious. He presents the corruption part of the game perfectly, in contrast to some other love interests that are vanilla, happy and safe. This was spelt out by Eva multiple times. Seymour is the main antagonist, he is not good. Every conversation was a dance with the unknown of why he would approach Lena and how he would do it.
The other main antagonist is Axel. Eva also went out of their way to delete an early sympathetic side of him and made him even more ruthless and despicable to emphasize the corruption. If Axel embodies the physical corruption, an animalistic predator who physically drags Lena around like a doll, then Seymour is the mental corruptor, someone who manipulates and poisons Lenas mind so much that she falls further and further in depravity on her own, until she makes a move on him because he lets her think its her idea.
And instead we get Seymour awkwardly making a move on her and simply retreating like the simp he is. Unless that is a ploy to make him seem feeble (which I doubt), he and Eva had utterly lost droped the ball with the latest release. The inclusion of Arthur may seem harmless and if its just a cameo it may be, but it was an immediate warning label to me that he is there to make Seymour look milder, meek and "good", to fill in the actual corruption regards prositution that was deemed first in that pointless poll.
So yeah, I want evil Seymour, most of all I want him to be in control. Not the toothless cuck I worry about giving a heart attack whenever I let Lena allow him to fuck him.
This so much.The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.
Seymour was introduced as a mysterious, enigmatic, sinister man, whose "love" towards Lena is extremely dubious. He presents the corruption part of the game perfectly, in contrast to some other love interests that are vanilla, happy and safe. This was spelt out by Eva multiple times. Seymour is the main antagonist, he is not good. Every conversation was a dance with the unknown of why he would approach Lena and how he would do it.
The other main antagonist is Axel. Eva also went out of their way to delete an early sympathetic side of him and made him even more ruthless and despicable to emphasize the corruption. If Axel embodies the physical corruption, an animalistic predator who physically drags Lena around like a doll, then Seymour is the mental corruptor, someone who manipulates and poisons Lenas mind so much that she falls further and further in depravity on her own, until she makes a move on him because he lets her think its her idea.
And instead we get Seymour awkwardly making a move on her and simply retreating like the simp he is. Unless that is a ploy to make him seem feeble (which I doubt), he and Eva had utterly lost droped the ball with the latest release. The inclusion of Arthur may seem harmless and if its just a cameo it may be, but it was an immediate warning label to me that he is there to make Seymour look milder, meek and "good", to fill in the actual corruption regards prositution that was deemed first in that pointless poll.
So yeah, I want evil Seymour, most of all I want him to be in control. Not the toothless cuck I worry about giving a heart attack whenever I let Lena allow him to fuck him.
100% true. In short: Seymour has now been relegated to what Ed may have been supposed to be at one point (? - was dropped too early in development to know for sure) and Arthur is now brought back to take over what we expected Seymour to be. All pretty strange but what do I know - maybe there´ll be more twists. It´s not like I really played the Seymour route anyway but with Arthur now in it, I might actually reconsider. Purely for scientific reason, off course.The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.
Seymour was introduced as a mysterious, enigmatic, sinister man, whose "love" towards Lena is extremely dubious. He presents the corruption part of the game perfectly, in contrast to some other love interests that are vanilla, happy and safe. This was spelt out by Eva multiple times. Seymour is the main antagonist, he is not good. Every conversation was a dance with the unknown of why he would approach Lena and how he would do it.
The other main antagonist is Axel. Eva also went out of their way to delete an early sympathetic side of him and made him even more ruthless and despicable to emphasize the corruption. If Axel embodies the physical corruption, an animalistic predator who physically drags Lena around like a doll, then Seymour is the mental corruptor, someone who manipulates and poisons Lenas mind so much that she falls further and further in depravity on her own, until she makes a move on him because he lets her think its her idea.
And instead we get Seymour awkwardly making a move on her and simply retreating like the simp he is. Unless that is a ploy to make him seem feeble (which I doubt), he and Eva had utterly lost droped the ball with the latest release. The inclusion of Arthur may seem harmless and if its just a cameo it may be, but it was an immediate warning label to me that he is there to make Seymour look milder, meek and "good", to fill in the actual corruption regards prositution that was deemed first in that pointless poll.
So yeah, I want evil Seymour, most of all I want him to be in control. Not the toothless cuck I worry about giving a heart attack whenever I let Lena allow him to fuck him.
Could be, mainly debunked by patreons/steams strict guidelines against incest.what if Seymour is actually Lena's father?
While the author has done incest content before, that was in a time when Patreon weren't going on a rampage against anyone who dares make this sort of content.what if Seymour is actually Lena's father?
I dont think hes the father but i can see Lena mom being Seymour first and only love....what if Seymour is actually Lena's father?
Ian could already fuck Louise, so that ship has been sailed. Ivy's, meanwhile, hasn't even left the port.Going to laugh if Ian gets content with Louise while still never getting any Ivy content. Feels like Eva has a specific grudge against this pairing for whatever reason
Better than that, he got a threesome with her and Lena.Ian could already fuck Louise, so that ship has been sailed. Ivy's, meanwhile, hasn't even left the port.
Hi!The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.
Seymour was introduced as a mysterious, enigmatic, sinister man, whose "love" towards Lena is extremely dubious. He presents the corruption part of the game perfectly, in contrast to some other love interests that are vanilla, happy and safe. This was spelt out by Eva multiple times. Seymour is the main antagonist, he is not good. Every conversation was a dance with the unknown of why he would approach Lena and how he would do it.
The other main antagonist is Axel. Eva also went out of their way to delete an early sympathetic side of him and made him even more ruthless and despicable to emphasize the corruption. If Axel embodies the physical corruption, an animalistic predator who physically drags Lena around like a doll, then Seymour is the mental corruptor, someone who manipulates and poisons Lenas mind so much that she falls further and further in depravity on her own, until she makes a move on him because he lets her think its her idea.
And instead we get Seymour awkwardly making a move on her and simply retreating like the simp he is. Unless that is a ploy to make him seem feeble (which I doubt), he and Eva had utterly lost droped the ball with the latest release. The inclusion of Arthur may seem harmless and if its just a cameo it may be, but it was an immediate warning label to me that he is there to make Seymour look milder, meek and "good", to fill in the actual corruption regards prositution that was deemed first in that pointless poll.
So yeah, I want evil Seymour, most of all I want him to be in control. Not the toothless cuck I worry about giving a heart attack whenever I let Lena allow him to fuck him.
It's very easy being nice to the people who are nice to you. The marker for goodness isn't in how you treat those close to you, but how you treat people who you don't directly stand to gain from treating them nicely. As an example holding doors open for a date is nice gesture, but doesn't actually reveal your character because you could be doing so as a way to get in good standing. On the other hand, holding the door open for strangers who you have nothing to gain from probably reveals more about your character.Hi!
You might remember that some players, like e.g. Doom and myself, from early on voiced our opinion that Seymour is NOT the evil bastard a majority of players seemed to think.There were several, sometimes blatant, hints into the direction that Seymour is a hard, calculating business man, but there is more to him outside his business self.
I think a majority of players misread the antagonist label. The business part of Seymour is one who knows how the system functions and is good at playing the big game. Seymour does not care if some businesses go down if it advances his and his friends agendas, in so far he is the antagonist of parts of Baluart, but that does not make him evil like e.g. Artur is. Seymour is simply good at being a business man. Some people might not like it, but to make an omlett you need to break some eggs. While the economy is not quite the zero sum game a lot of people believe, there is more to it than simple theory says, it was, is and will be a tank of sharks. That is one side.
If you play a Lena who has really good relations with Seymour you can learn quite a bit about him. Some things the players who could not wait to antagonise him never saw it seems. How this update played out, with Seymour NOT an evil bastard, was something that surprised me not really. Seymour can be a puppet player when it comes to business, but he is less so in private with people he likes. He can be altruistic if he wants to be or is reminded to by people close to him.
Besides, one of the biggest hints for such a"turn of events" as the new update was is actually the person Seymour was based on.