Ir0n Ma1den
Well-Known Member
- Jun 15, 2021
- 1,696
- 2,233
doesnt the last ever update state that there should have been more extensions to the endings? Or did I read that wrong?Man hope that the dev comes back to this game and makes a sequal.
The changelog spoiler only goes up to 1.01.1 but the final version here is 1.03.2 which is supposed to be the complete version iirc. There's still some bugs at any rate. The changelog talks about a recent version having enemies no longer able to see you through walls when in fact they still very much can if you're close enough to them on the other side of the wall lol.doesnt the last ever update state that there should have been more extensions to the endings? Or did I read that wrong?
thx for the clarificationThe changelog spoiler only goes up to 1.01.1 but the final version here is 1.03.2 which is supposed to be the complete version iirc. There's still some bugs at any rate. The changelog talks about a recent version having enemies no longer able to see you through walls when in fact they still very much can if you're close enough to them on the other side of the wall lol.
Input.keyMapper[80] = "P";
Input.keyMapper[69] = "E";
Input.isTriggered('P')
Did you figure it out? How to get her?Natasha is missing for me, any idea what gives? I know she's supposed to be here (below screenshot) but she isn't.
I completed Cassie's quest and Sofia's quest already. The "East Brookside" quest is stuck at "Find and speak to Natasha." I've scoured the whole camp.
Any ideas?
Thanks
View attachment 3840590
Don't play it then , if you can't handle made up drawn characters.I'm sorry, but isn't anyone else a little uncomfortable how often the word cunny is used during Juno's sex scenes? It also doesn't help how... "immature", to say the least, the Dryad offspring look when they start fucking Juno.
Like it's really stretching some limits here. All-in-all, it's a 10/10 game. Hell, not even, I would say more than that. Definitely in my top 10 rn, but the stuff I just mentioned is really dragging it down by a lot.
I would watch absolutely everything because it is not real. I don't care if the dryads are 10 years old. They ain't real. They have no parents, no feelings,no consiousness or dreams. They are literally souless code drawn for profit. If that disturbs you then you ain't ready for real life.I'm sorry, but isn't anyone else a little uncomfortable how often the word cunny is used during Juno's sex scenes? It also doesn't help how... "immature", to say the least, the Dryad offspring look when they start fucking Juno.
Like it's really stretching some limits here. All-in-all, it's a 10/10 game. Hell, not even, I would say more than that. Definitely in my top 10 rn, but the stuff I just mentioned is really dragging it down by a lot.
This is a fairly immature argument. It's widely accepted that portrayal of an idea is at the least related to the enactment of the idea--hence why laws and censorship for these products exists. You jerking off to the image at all is proof of that: they aren't just nonsensical pixels but are rather a meaningful organization of colors into an order which excites your libido. You're actively recognizing them as a sexual entity by the mere fact of sexually pleasuring yourself to them.I would watch absolutely everything because it is not real. I don't care if the dryads are 10 years old. They ain't real. They have no parents, no feelings,no consiousness or dreams. They are literally souless code drawn for profit. If that disturbs you then you ain't ready for real life.
You sound like those screaming harpies from australia that censor things they don't like. Your same logic can apply to shooting games etc as well.This is a fairly immature argument. It's widely accepted that portrayal of an idea is at the least related to the enactment of the idea--hence why laws and censorship for these products exists. You jerking off to the image at all is proof of that: they aren't just nonsensical pixels but are rather a meaningful organization of colors into an order which excites your libido. You're actively recognizing them as a sexual entity by the mere fact of sexually pleasuring yourself to them.
You're essentially arguing it's 100% fine to jerk off to drawings of a six-month old baby being raped because it's not a real baby. While true that it isn't happening to a real, live baby, your brain and the artist's brain recognizing it as real is the issue, not the material existence of the image subject. You are engaging with the concept of "baby being raped"--or, in the case of this game, baby that looks 10 years old having sex. That is the concern, not whether a drawing is experiencing trauma or not.
I don't care what is accepted especially by this clownish soft hypocritical backstabbing population these days that doesn't even know where it's at. Yes i sometimes fap to questionable things when the mood hits me and i'm not even gonna lie - fem. prey vore, r*pe, NTR, sex slavery, to models of Ellie Williams or Evelyn from Resident Evil (rarely but i do) not for the reasons you think. Since you mentioned this gross example i will cover it specifically. I don't find little girls attractive, hell i don't find 18 year olds also because they are too young for me, they are a flat board with nothing. In fact i think that they should be protected and nurtured right. I am very much into 24+ year old women, even milfs in real life. Why do i do it then? Because sometimes life is cruel, sometimes life is degenerate and this is why i play games where you can play as an underrage girl 14+ that can prostitute herself only so she can survive the next day. REALISTIC. When one is put into a situation that is against him/her, dark shit happens. There are games and movies for children about love and friendship, there are also games and movies about murder and violence in general. Am i a future murderer if i liked those movies? No, despite watching them for my entertainment. Killers kill people for their own entertainment so what makes us not become one? Why should porn be any different?This is a fairly immature argument. It's widely accepted that portrayal of an idea is at the least related to the enactment of the idea--hence why laws and censorship for these products exists. You jerking off to the image at all is proof of that: they aren't just nonsensical pixels but are rather a meaningful organization of colors into an order which excites your libido. You're actively recognizing them as a sexual entity by the mere fact of sexually pleasuring yourself to them.
You're essentially arguing it's 100% fine to jerk off to drawings of a six-month old baby being raped because it's not a real baby. While true that it isn't happening to a real, live baby, your brain and the artist's brain recognizing it as real is the issue, not the material existence of the image subject. You are engaging with the concept of "baby being raped"--or, in the case of this game, baby that looks 10 years old having sex. That is the concern, not whether a drawing is experiencing trauma or not.
Nah, not really. I've heard of people being turned-off by specific vocabulary choices - I think I remember seeing a Youtuber quoted as saying that they found 'tummy' to be super offputting in a sexual context - and it doesn't mean you're a bad person if you have a squick like that, but it can be very personal, and the exact opposite of universal. I don't mind "cunny" or "tummy" for my part, but that's the sort of thing that one discovers when consuming porn!I'm sorry, but isn't anyone else a little uncomfortable how often the word cunny is used during Juno's sex scenes? It also doesn't help how... "immature", to say the least, the Dryad offspring look when they start fucking Juno.
Like it's really stretching some limits here. All-in-all, it's a 10/10 game. Hell, not even, I would say more than that. Definitely in my top 10 rn, but the stuff I just mentioned is really dragging it down by a lot.