Bill Temple
Active Member
- May 20, 2021
- 785
- 2,924
The thing that baffles me while I've been watching from the sidelines these past several days of complaints that this handjob is a rug pull, is that this is the prologue. This is where the setting, the tone, the expectations, some of the major antagonists of the story are established. Discovering reader/player incompatibility with the plot should happen at exactly this point. I can't tell you how many books I've put back on the shelf after chapter 1, but it's up to two this month already.
And the gripes about the terms of the deal with Chuck not explicitly including that Ed may need to get his dick wet in the line of his duties at a sex club, seem not naive, but rather deliberately obtuse.
More full details of the agreement are disclosed off-screen. We should infer from Edwin's thought "If I want to get paid, I have to do this." that the terms of the agreement did include some terms vague (or maybe specific) enough that led him (a 21 year old undergraduate student in an illegal and powerful sex club) to believe he should go with this. If we were to see a scene where Ian or Chuck explain that sometime they "have" to perform sexually for the job, would that change anything? I don't think it would.
I get not liking the scene, and it maybe making the game unplayable for some. I mean, I don't actually get it, but I understand intellectually that some people get triggered seeing hot, evil old bitches drugging and forcibly masturbating people. I'm not a fan of being sexually assaulted IRL either, but the guy that happened to on screen isn't me. Really it's the whining that readers were misled or that the writing is bad or inconsistent that seems more disingenuous than ignorant.
Arguments about player agency are as pointless as always. Games and VNs are limited in scope. The story is on rails, whether you like it or not. To give a player the choice to fully refuse the sadistic, narcissistic primary antagonist of the story at their first real interaction would significantly declaw her. We're learning that she's going to do crazy shit, push boundaries, make everyone under her control squirm with discomfort (or worse). If we get an alpha Chad option in this drugging/handjob scene in the prologue then much of the conflict of the rest of the game is going to be undercut and Edwin is going to be a really inconsistent character, or a totally different one than the author intends to write. The story changes and is shortened significantly if Edwin can at any moment just nope out of the tasks he's assigned.
The story is about the less privileged being used by the powerful, and how they'll struggle to get through that situation. It's not a wish fulfillment fantasy about how we become the greatest, most dominant, most beloved, and most respected slave master in the history of underground sex clubs of the rich and famous. If that's what you want, Red Sakura Mansion 2 just updated today.
And the gripes about the terms of the deal with Chuck not explicitly including that Ed may need to get his dick wet in the line of his duties at a sex club, seem not naive, but rather deliberately obtuse.

More full details of the agreement are disclosed off-screen. We should infer from Edwin's thought "If I want to get paid, I have to do this." that the terms of the agreement did include some terms vague (or maybe specific) enough that led him (a 21 year old undergraduate student in an illegal and powerful sex club) to believe he should go with this. If we were to see a scene where Ian or Chuck explain that sometime they "have" to perform sexually for the job, would that change anything? I don't think it would.
I get not liking the scene, and it maybe making the game unplayable for some. I mean, I don't actually get it, but I understand intellectually that some people get triggered seeing hot, evil old bitches drugging and forcibly masturbating people. I'm not a fan of being sexually assaulted IRL either, but the guy that happened to on screen isn't me. Really it's the whining that readers were misled or that the writing is bad or inconsistent that seems more disingenuous than ignorant.
Arguments about player agency are as pointless as always. Games and VNs are limited in scope. The story is on rails, whether you like it or not. To give a player the choice to fully refuse the sadistic, narcissistic primary antagonist of the story at their first real interaction would significantly declaw her. We're learning that she's going to do crazy shit, push boundaries, make everyone under her control squirm with discomfort (or worse). If we get an alpha Chad option in this drugging/handjob scene in the prologue then much of the conflict of the rest of the game is going to be undercut and Edwin is going to be a really inconsistent character, or a totally different one than the author intends to write. The story changes and is shortened significantly if Edwin can at any moment just nope out of the tasks he's assigned.
The story is about the less privileged being used by the powerful, and how they'll struggle to get through that situation. It's not a wish fulfillment fantasy about how we become the greatest, most dominant, most beloved, and most respected slave master in the history of underground sex clubs of the rich and famous. If that's what you want, Red Sakura Mansion 2 just updated today.