At this point I feel we need Tinkerer to way in & tell us cos this argument is getting g boring. You're point is based on SOME depictions of a race of souped-up Goblins created by an author that never existed before then & have been changed, used & represented by almost every fantasy creator that has followed. If Orcs arnt monster girls the Goblins are not monster either. End of story.
Stop bring up tolkien. This has always been a debate about apperance and not their role in the story. I kept bringing up dnd earlier because fantasy orcs in modern fantasy tend to take their apperance from dnd. And yes I agree it's boring. Most people don't consider orc women too be monster girls. Your free to disagree, but that's not the general consensus
But they are BOTH Succubi, ED is literally a clone of Naamah... you're logic is failing now
I've explained my logic multiple time. It's you who doesn't really understand it. I've said over and over again that it's all about appearance not about what "race" they are. Most demons in fantasy can look however they want, but most people don't coni. You're the one who is hung up on author's intent and folklore when that's not how anyone defines monster girl.
You must be registered to see the links
It's about visual characteristics. Not any sort of character traits or origins.
You can make that argument for ANY mythical or Sci-Fi race ever created by horny nerds. Which most of us are let's be honest.
I mean I kind of did earlier when I kept mentioning star trek