Your project, you do what you want. You just don't get to complain when you implement one of the forbidden features from the list that it destroys your product. I suppose that is your incentive to not do so.
If you read the review, you'd know what you have to do to get the rating to change. I periodically revisit games I've reviewed. If you addressed the issues I had in some fashion, you'd get a higher rating. For example, when Call of Beyond v0.1 came out I rated it a 1 star. Now, at v0.3, its 3 stars. You want me to rate it higher, do something about it.
I'm not really following the development, because the last two updates you made, did nothing to address my issues. So what is my incentive to follow development, if the reasons why I couldn't play it haven't been addressed?
If you intentionally troll people, people will respond in kind. If you intentionally try to destroy something they really liked that you created, they respond equally as bad if not worse. It would be like the artist of the Mona Lisa, coming in and drawing a nipple slip on it. Its their art, so they could do what they want, but anyone who liked the original, would likely be enraged.