oh tx 4 infoSome time in October to December is what we are guessing.
Love all the HUNTER scenes, Need more.true and saddev put too much huntr
Ok I haven’t been on here yesterday so I want to say that once sterling shows the family proof of him being evil, I feel like Hunter will be smart and try to spin it around on sterling, saying he’s the one who’s plan on getting with the girls and being evil and etc.Hunter warned him NOT to make any moves. It was one of his earliest threats. If Sterling made any moves, he will kick the entire family out of the house and they would live in the streets. That's why Sterling isn't making any moves, not because he is scared or doesn't know what to do, but because if he does anything, his family will pay for it.
That's why he reacts to Hunters attempts instead of pre-emptive blocking. Sure, I'm surprised Hunter hasn't actually called him out on Sterling cock blocking him or taken actions to punish Sterling. In a way, he's going against what Hunter told him to do, but that's not here nor there.
As for the engaged to get rid of Hunter. He is putting the evidence together to beat him once and for all. Like the diary, the drugs he found with Tiff and all the injuries like the tooth Brenna knocked out. Once he has enough undeniable proof that Hunter is evil, that's when he'll act instead of react.
On that same note, i hope there is like a phoenix right stand off when it's time to present the evidence. Present it right and you incriminate Hunter. Though for PV, present the case wrong or fail to convince the girls leads to a bad end. Like Hunter flips all the allegations onto Sterling.
This is an "or" that you thought about on this thread but it wasn't ever shown in the game. Sterling didn't even said that "I looked for them but didn't find them" or that " i didn't thought hunter would be so dumb to hide his drug stash under a bed", he even put them into a vault which again adds to the fact that he didn't find those before (because he didn't tried) otherwise he would have taken action and that, it was something important. So your statement doesn't hold any ground.Or the bag wasn't there when Sterling checked Hunter's room. The surprise wasn't "how didn't I check" but "how did Hunter slip up like that".
You seem to forget that Hunter holds all the cards. The moment Sterling takes a direct action, Hunter pulls the plug. Sterling is forced to remain under the radar.
You are forgetting the dynamics of blackmailing, the blackmailer always say to not do anything stupid but for the one who is getting blackmailed "stupid" would be to just give in to the blackmailer or do something so drastic that it comes in sight of the blackmailer. Sterling don't know, because his character is made like that as I've already said but you should know by now that even if sterling push it a little bit, hunter can't just leave his dream just to show sterling the consequences of his actions that is stopping the flow because that would be mutual damage, because Hunter will not be able to get the household either. Also hunter can't get rid of sterling straight up without making up some shit like the bear one or the sterling feminization one because he is loved by the household. By keeping this in mind there are endless possibilities to give some scenes where sterling is actually doing something to get rid of hunter which would have been fun for the vanilla fans to watch.Hunter warned him NOT to make any moves. It was one of his earliest threats. If Sterling made any moves, he will kick the entire family out of the house and they would live in the streets. That's why Sterling isn't making any moves, not because he is scared or doesn't know what to do, but because if he does anything, his family will pay for it.
I am not suggesting that sterling do something that blocks hunter entirely from approaching the girls but a story where Sterling is shown doing something that will have a weakening effect on hunter in the far future or something that sterling thinks will weaken hunter in near future but somehow he turns out to be wrong like replacing hunters drugs with something weak or entirely useless like he did in one of the Ophelia bad ends. Another way to look at it would be that sterling is shown making himself financially strong instead of relying entirely on Brenna or other LIs like Catherine and Ophelia are foreshadowed to be financially helpful in future releases.That's why he reacts to Hunters attempts instead of pre-emptive blocking. Sure, I'm surprised Hunter hasn't actually called him out on Sterling cock blocking him or taken actions to punish Sterling. In a way, he's going against what Hunter told him to do, but that's not here nor there.
The blackmail came later. Hunter holds all the cards since he's the one paying the morgage. If Sterling gets rid of Hunter, they lose the house, hence the plan to make money. If Sterling was the one making money, Hunter could have easily gotten rid of him because Sterling was still a newcomer at that point, so he had to convince Brenna to make the money.You are forgetting the dynamics of blackmailing
And if Sterling does something over against Hunter, Hunter has proof that Sterling is "up to no good", but Sterling has nothing on Hunter. So there would be no mutual damage.but you should know by now that even if sterling push it a little bit, hunter can't just leave his dream just to show sterling the consequences of his actions that is stopping the flow because that would be mutual damage.
Not anymore since all those "non-actions" you're complaining about made Sterling loved by the household. At the start, he was an outsider and no one would have questioned it if he had left again.Also hunter can't get rid of sterling straight up without making up some shit like the bear one or the sterling feminization one because he is loved by the household.
Like getting Brenna to make money so they don't need to rely on Hunter for paying the morgage? Or getting closer to his family so he can't be removed so easily?but a story where Sterling is shown doing something that will have a weakening effect on hunter in the far future or something that sterling thinks will weaken hunter in near future
Because Sterling is playing mindgames. If Sterling told Tiff not to say anything, Hunter would have suspected Sterling and started looking into what he was up to and perhaps uncover just what Sterling was up to (Hunter doesn't know about his alliance with Lucia for instance). But if Hunter knows that Sterling has the drugs there's no need for that, since he already knows Sterling is trying to stop him. Basically, it's easier to be dishonest if you're being honest.+ Question: if he wasn't allowed to make a move why he told tiff to say to hunter that "I confiscated the drugs" if he asks and then put them into a vault?
Hunter holds all the cards since he's the one paying the morgage.
And if Sterling does something over against Hunter, Hunter has proof that Sterling is "up to no good", but Sterling has nothing on Hunter. So there would be no mutual damage.
Can anyone make sense of this for me?But if Hunter knows that Sterling has the drugs there's no need for that, since he already knows Sterling is trying to stop him.
if sterling push it a little bit, hunter wouldn't just leave his dream that easily just to show sterling the consequences of his actions that is stopping the flow because that would be mutual damage, because Hunter will not be able to get the household either.
We are living in 2023, sterling didn't have to especially do anything physical that is easy to notice, he very much could have worked on a PC. And it's just a story if Dev wants it anything is possible. Anyway, good thing he is helping Brenna and rightfully getting half of her earning. Also it was just an example of things that could have been shown on Sterling's part but I personally don't have any major issue with this one.If Sterling was the one making money, Hunter could have easily gotten rid of him because Sterling was still a newcomer at that point, so he had to convince Brenna to make the money.
Not the "non-actions" but the actions that sterling did to get their trust and affection and I have to give it to wwg he really outdid in this aspect. I wasn't complaining, just stating my perspective.Not anymore since all those "non-actions" you're complaining about made Sterling loved by the household. At the start, he was an outsider and no one would have questioned it if he had left again.
I have already mentioned these are helping but I am saying something more than that would have been appreciated by many and that wouldn't need that many renders or story writing certainly not more than the story, renders and 2 animations that were wasted on making "games" in this game especially in the "DnD game" But it would have been majorly appreciated by the fan base at the moment he is not liked by many and hated by some. Even so far in the game sterling is only physically appealing but not so much has changed on the mental department.Like getting Brenna to make money so they don't need to rely on Hunter for paying the morgage? Or getting closer to his family so he can't be removed so easily?
I've been trying to follow this fragmented conversation, but I just want to point out a few things:Can anyone make sense of this for me?
Or did you meant this?
We are living in 2023, sterling didn't have to especially do anything physical that is easy to notice, he very much could have worked on a PC. And it's just a story if Dev wants it anything is possible. Anyway, good thing he is helping Brenna and rightfully getting half of her earning. Also it was just an example of things that could have been shown on Sterling's part but I personally don't have any major issue with this one.
Not the "non-actions" but the actions that sterling did to get their trust and affection and I have to give it to wwg he really outdid in this aspect. I wasn't complaining, just stating my perspective.
Sterling would have done things without hunter noticing in earlier chapters because even in the real world their is this saying "you are innocent until you get caught".
Still it would not have been questionable if sterling did something outside of badends that hunter noticed and didn't got rid of him for that, maybe a warning or two.
Really it's shown in current game that hunter was fed up of sterling Meddling with his affairs that he has to get rid of him, meddling that was during badends and not from main story.
I have already mentioned these are helping but I am saying something more than that would have been appreciated by many and that wouldn't need that many renders or story writing certainly not more than the story, renders and 2 animations that were wasted on making "games" in this game especially in the "DnD game" But it would have been majorly appreciated by the fan base at the moment he is not liked by many and hated by some. Even so far in the game sterling is only physically appealing but not so much has changed on the mental department.
Again I am not complaining or demanding something. Just stating my perspective that if wwg have implemented this their would be more praise and less debate on this thread unless it was intentional for some other reason.
I enjoyed the scenes with Hunter and I hope there will be many in chapter 12. Will you be integrating the "What If" scenes into the main game in the future?Vanilla players begged me to remove Hunter from every non-NTR scene.
Now, vanilla players are angry that I didn't have some epic cat and mouse game with Hunter?
You dummies don't know what you want.
Thanos come to Earth to get the infinte stones and the heros have to fight back Infinity War
Harry Potter have to seek for the horcruxes to defeat Voldermont once he accomplish to come back
Loki try conquer Earth and make the heros form The Avengers in the first Avengers movie
Rocky Balboa fighting Ivan Drago to revenge Apollo Creed's death.
Luke Skywalker going to fight Dath Vader to help his captured friends in Empire Strike Back
John Wick killing everyone because they killed his dog
most super hero stories are the superheros reacting to what a super villain does, for example, batman almost never seeks the joker out unless he suspects him of a crime, superman never goes looking in space for evil aliens.
Recent example, 'everything everywhere all at once', its plot only starts because the main antagonist starts taking action, and most of the movie is just the main character reacting to other characters until the end.
I contemplated on this for some time but in the end I realised that I didn't had to.Sure, EVERY make believe story or fantasy EVER. The hero of the stories never go to the demon king, villain, antagonist before they've done anything wrong. Bad guys exist, because they must do wrong first and the hero is then created to counter him. The hero is never made first, otherwise if a hero kills a villain before the villain commits a crime, then the hero is really the bad guy.
I showed you examples, because it's all that exist. YOU show ME an example where the hero of the story defeated the villain before the villain commits crimes.
Ophelia was forced to sell the house to pay overdue bills, but Hunter stepped in and saved the day. He's the one who's paying all the bills. If Hunter is gone, they lose the house and thus everything. So, at the moment any action against Hunter is a no-win scenario. Either Hunter wins and Sterling loses, or Hunter loses and Sterling (and the others) still lose, a lot more than Hunter would lose.Can anyone make sense of this for me?
I'm sorry, I don't know what you mean by this. Do you mean he'd go after an office job where he can work at home? He's 19 without office experience. Not a lot of people are hiring, not in this economy.We are living in 2023, sterling didn't have to especially do anything physical that is easy to notice, he very much could have worked on a PC.
Again, don't know what you mean by this. All the meddling that Sterling did was in the main story since the bad endings aren't canon thus never happened.Really it's shown in current game that hunter was fed up of sterling Meddling with his affairs that he has to get rid of him, meddling that was during badends and not from main story.
Hey! I liked the DnD game! I thought it was a real shame it never came back and I've always suggested someone would bring it back for a What If (yes, a non-NTR What If! The audacity!).renders and 2 animations that were wasted on making "games" in this game especially in the "DnD game"
And the ones who hate Sterling are people who don't get the joke. I swear, satire is a lost artform that no one gets anymore. This whole game is a joke! A parody of your run of the mill AVN! Instead of the MC being the creepy underhanded blackmailing and drugging horny creep, it's the guy we're trying to stop and we play the moral superior character.But it would have been majorly appreciated by the fan base at the moment he is not liked by many and hated by some.
Yes, because intelligence and wisdom are just a stats on a character sheet and can be raised by reading various books. It doesn't work that way. Unlike strenght, those are stats that very rarely change and even less move upwards. Not to insult Sterling, but once an idiot, always an idiot.Even so far in the game sterling is only physically appealing but not so much has changed on the mental department.
Your comment that we all replied to was asking for examples of stories where the antagonist makes the first move/is the active character for most of the story. We weren't comparing sterling to AAA movie characters, we were giving examples of stories in which the antagonist makes the first move.I contemplated on this for some time but in the end I realised that I didn't had to.
Don't know why you are comparing triple A movies with this game but anyway as I have already said either you misunderstood my point or are entirely wrong in making a point because if your point is that MCs of these stories doesn't make a move until the antagonist make a major move again when they are already a threat then you definitely are wrong.
it always start with the antagonist making a move like blackmailing, killing a loved one, doing some other shit or its already established that antagonist is worth punishing for an event in past. After that most MCs goes head on heels against the antagonist at least most likeable ones.
About them not taking risks lol, these movies are full of MCs making some dumb/risky moves that end up working in the end, that some might question "what the heck is going on here?" but still people like them.
And comparing sterling with John wick?
This leads to the obvious conclusion - just do this game like you do it rn, no real need for changes. )Vanilla players begged me to remove Hunter from every non-NTR scene.
Now, vanilla players are angry that I didn't have some epic cat and mouse game with Hunter?
You dummies don't know what you want.