Can you give some examples that can support your point?
Exactly. This is such a widely known concept but it's still worth discussing.So many movies, comics, games, books that all support his point. Arguably, even the bible with Job - Satan in Heaven convincing God to test Job's faith.
It's almost always the antagonist's actions that lead to the protagonists having to react to what the antagonist has instigated.
Hunter warned him NOT to make any moves. It was one of his earliest threats. If Sterling made any moves, he will kick the entire family out of the house and they would live in the streets. That's why Sterling isn't making any moves, not because he is scared or doesn't know what to do, but because if he does anything, his family will pay for it.But in that sense hunter threatening the mc that he will destroy his household at the start should be enough for the mc to react to it like how John wick reacted, jw just traced the culprit and killed him cold-blooded. But that's not what I want the mc to do, I just want him to be more engaged about getting rid of hunter without letting him know and not just kill him or chop his leg off or make any other stupid move. I think that's the misunderstanding.
It's not like Sterling is doing nothing, but he is playing defense. This is because he's not ready or able to make more proactive moves against Hunter. Think less action-flick and more spy-thriller.I think there's a misunderstanding here. Still I will watch some of the stated references and get back here as soon as possible. I just watched first episode of the "chainsaw man" but I didn't find any similarities between that and this vn, so far I didn't notice anything in it that supports the point that protagonists only react when shit have hit the fan, axcept of course at the start of every story like how John wick reacted to his dog being killed by the mobs. But in that sense hunter threatening the mc that he will destroy his household at the start should be enough for the mc to react to it like how John wick reacted, jw just traced the culprit and killed him cold-blooded. But that's not what I want the mc to do, I just want him to be more engaged about getting rid of hunter without letting him know and not just kill him or chop his leg off or make any other stupid move. I think that's the misunderstanding.
Now that thats cleared up, i have a few pointers about what to do when you dont like a game or a specific kink in it:
1. Delete the game from your PC and dont download the future updates.
2. Use that ignore thread function provided by the site.
What not to do:
1. Dont go to that thread and bitch about it and cause inconvenience to the regulars there.
Haight i will not thread ban you but if you repeat it then we will have to.
Some of you might have lost your posts which are not offtopic but let's start from where you guys left off before stupidity took hold of this thread
P.S: for anyone who wanna complain or cry about something just use off-topic section, Thanks .
oh tx 4 infoSome time in October to December is what we are guessing.
Love all the HUNTER scenes, Need more.true and saddev put too much huntr
Ok I haven’t been on here yesterday so I want to say that once sterling shows the family proof of him being evil, I feel like Hunter will be smart and try to spin it around on sterling, saying he’s the one who’s plan on getting with the girls and being evil and etc.Hunter warned him NOT to make any moves. It was one of his earliest threats. If Sterling made any moves, he will kick the entire family out of the house and they would live in the streets. That's why Sterling isn't making any moves, not because he is scared or doesn't know what to do, but because if he does anything, his family will pay for it.
That's why he reacts to Hunters attempts instead of pre-emptive blocking. Sure, I'm surprised Hunter hasn't actually called him out on Sterling cock blocking him or taken actions to punish Sterling. In a way, he's going against what Hunter told him to do, but that's not here nor there.
As for the engaged to get rid of Hunter. He is putting the evidence together to beat him once and for all. Like the diary, the drugs he found with Tiff and all the injuries like the tooth Brenna knocked out. Once he has enough undeniable proof that Hunter is evil, that's when he'll act instead of react.
On that same note, i hope there is like a phoenix right stand off when it's time to present the evidence. Present it right and you incriminate Hunter. Though for PV, present the case wrong or fail to convince the girls leads to a bad end. Like Hunter flips all the allegations onto Sterling.
This is an "or" that you thought about on this thread but it wasn't ever shown in the game. Sterling didn't even said that "I looked for them but didn't find them" or that " i didn't thought hunter would be so dumb to hide his drug stash under a bed", he even put them into a vault which again adds to the fact that he didn't find those before (because he didn't tried) otherwise he would have taken action and that, it was something important. So your statement doesn't hold any ground.Or the bag wasn't there when Sterling checked Hunter's room. The surprise wasn't "how didn't I check" but "how did Hunter slip up like that".
You seem to forget that Hunter holds all the cards. The moment Sterling takes a direct action, Hunter pulls the plug. Sterling is forced to remain under the radar.
You are forgetting the dynamics of blackmailing, the blackmailer always say to not do anything stupid but for the one who is getting blackmailed "stupid" would be to just give in to the blackmailer or do something so drastic that it comes in sight of the blackmailer. Sterling don't know, because his character is made like that as I've already said but you should know by now that even if sterling push it a little bit, hunter can't just leave his dream just to show sterling the consequences of his actions that is stopping the flow because that would be mutual damage, because Hunter will not be able to get the household either. Also hunter can't get rid of sterling straight up without making up some shit like the bear one or the sterling feminization one because he is loved by the household. By keeping this in mind there are endless possibilities to give some scenes where sterling is actually doing something to get rid of hunter which would have been fun for the vanilla fans to watch.Hunter warned him NOT to make any moves. It was one of his earliest threats. If Sterling made any moves, he will kick the entire family out of the house and they would live in the streets. That's why Sterling isn't making any moves, not because he is scared or doesn't know what to do, but because if he does anything, his family will pay for it.
I am not suggesting that sterling do something that blocks hunter entirely from approaching the girls but a story where Sterling is shown doing something that will have a weakening effect on hunter in the far future or something that sterling thinks will weaken hunter in near future but somehow he turns out to be wrong like replacing hunters drugs with something weak or entirely useless like he did in one of the Ophelia bad ends. Another way to look at it would be that sterling is shown making himself financially strong instead of relying entirely on Brenna or other LIs like Catherine and Ophelia are foreshadowed to be financially helpful in future releases.That's why he reacts to Hunters attempts instead of pre-emptive blocking. Sure, I'm surprised Hunter hasn't actually called him out on Sterling cock blocking him or taken actions to punish Sterling. In a way, he's going against what Hunter told him to do, but that's not here nor there.
The blackmail came later. Hunter holds all the cards since he's the one paying the morgage. If Sterling gets rid of Hunter, they lose the house, hence the plan to make money. If Sterling was the one making money, Hunter could have easily gotten rid of him because Sterling was still a newcomer at that point, so he had to convince Brenna to make the money.You are forgetting the dynamics of blackmailing
And if Sterling does something over against Hunter, Hunter has proof that Sterling is "up to no good", but Sterling has nothing on Hunter. So there would be no mutual damage.but you should know by now that even if sterling push it a little bit, hunter can't just leave his dream just to show sterling the consequences of his actions that is stopping the flow because that would be mutual damage.
Not anymore since all those "non-actions" you're complaining about made Sterling loved by the household. At the start, he was an outsider and no one would have questioned it if he had left again.Also hunter can't get rid of sterling straight up without making up some shit like the bear one or the sterling feminization one because he is loved by the household.
Like getting Brenna to make money so they don't need to rely on Hunter for paying the morgage? Or getting closer to his family so he can't be removed so easily?but a story where Sterling is shown doing something that will have a weakening effect on hunter in the far future or something that sterling thinks will weaken hunter in near future
Because Sterling is playing mindgames. If Sterling told Tiff not to say anything, Hunter would have suspected Sterling and started looking into what he was up to and perhaps uncover just what Sterling was up to (Hunter doesn't know about his alliance with Lucia for instance). But if Hunter knows that Sterling has the drugs there's no need for that, since he already knows Sterling is trying to stop him. Basically, it's easier to be dishonest if you're being honest.+ Question: if he wasn't allowed to make a move why he told tiff to say to hunter that "I confiscated the drugs" if he asks and then put them into a vault?