You've got a pretty good vocabulary, but I'm not sure about your reading comprehension when it comes to my comments or this game's story.
If I'm guilty of any fallacy here it would be whataboutism. A straw man would be if I try to argue your assertion with an unrelated point, e.g. you might say "Hunter is guilty of X" and I might say "You just hate Hunter"; this would be a straw man. On the other hand, if you say "Hunter is guilty of X" and I say "Sterling is also guilty of X", I'm not necessarily trying to refute your assertion, merely trying to get you to think about the story in this game from a larger perspective.
The age of consent varies from place to place; in Iceland (the only country we specifically know where Hunter seduced a family) it's 15 years old. As for whether Hunter and Drew are seducing minors in those other families? While I wouldn't put it past them, we don't actually know, so stop guessing.
Yes, Hunter and Drew are running a prostitution ring and profiting from it, but Hunter (under the influence of the truth drug) makes it sound like the women are willing participants who are keeping a decent share of their earnings, which is a far cry from brainwashing. It's easy to moralize about prostitution and paint all the women as victims, but some women freely choose it and to claim otherwise robs them of agency. We also don't know the legality of it where all the other families are, except the first one in (aforementioned) Iceland, where paying for sex is illegal but being a prostitute is not.
Sterling is effectively doing the same things Hunter and Drew did, i.e. fucking someone else's (Caspian's) entire family, using drugs even (Kumiko's "truth" serum). He's also been "prostituting" Brenna, himself, Catherine, and soon the rest of his family by having sex on camera for money. These are
obvious parallels in this story, so condemning Hunter and Drew while dismissing Sterling would be oblivious at best and hypocritical at worst.
View attachment 3820165