- May 24, 2019
- 967
- 1,850
You're not making much of an argument here. If consent can be retroactively withdrawn (which it can), then it can be retroactively given.“Retroactive consent” is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard. Just more BS for you to desperately defend Drew.
The point is, if you're so sensitive, you shouldn't be playing this game at all because Sterling has done some shitty things which ought to offend your delicate sensibilities. If you can't acknowledge that, it calls into question your objectivity and thereby weakens your argument against Drew.I didn’t mention anything about Sterling. “Yeah but look Sterling did something bad too, so what Drew did is fine!”
It's plausible that Drew would not have offered Brenna the wine if Drew herself was not under the effects of a drug in the air, so it's hard to say exactly how responsible she was for the Brenna scene. 30%? 80%? It's academic, that's why I settled on "partially".“I didn’t sugarcoat the Brenna scene” then you repeat that Drew was “partially guilty”. Drew literally willing gives her drugged wine so he can rape her. Yeah guys who roofie women are only partially guilty too right? You just love Drew and will defend anything he does including blatant rape and sexual assault. Saying people who don’t like that have a “hate boner” for Drew is wild.
It's also worth noting that while the bad ends may give us clues or insights about the characters, they are very much non-canon. Consider how easily all the women get over Sterling and move on to fucking Hunter or Kevin, etc. Do you really believe that the canon versions of the girls are so disloyal and easy? By the same token, you shouldn't take Drew's actions in the bad ends so seriously.