Not on that scene, but it will definitely happen on the porn ending road (I mean to participate physically). ^^Although Myriam will not be physically involved in the filming, she may participate as a producer or direct a scene.
Actually thought about going for this on this scene, but I preferred to keep it one step at a time on that front.She would be a great fluffer
Ooh, you bad spoiler boy
:-D Well, it is not the ending of my major interest, but who knows, maybe she will do something even before the ending, if she goes in that direction.
No, sorry, there was a lot of doggo content lately, I have a lot of other plot line to advance and push towards their end roads, so there will probably won't be before some time now.
There's never enough LOL. She needs to continue to surrender to the dark side.
Depending on your choices, she's already started a polyamorous relationship with William and Jenny, which a lot of people would consider to be very unconventional, even extreme. So she's certainly not a saint by any definition. Even at 18, she seems to be open to a lot of stuff, that's outside the norm. So describing her as pure, when comparing her to the norm is not really accurate, it's only when you compare her against the excesses her mother indulges in, that describing her as 'pure' has any relevance.
I think we know that eventually she is going to take part in a porn scene. But Zorlun is gradually introducing her to it, by degrees. From the moment Marc teased the possibility of posting his photos on a porn site, the likelihood that Myriam would end up doing porn has been there. Perhaps Myriam embarking on a porn career, and camming with Crystal, might be one of the endings for the game?Although Myriam will not be physically involved in the filming, she may participate as a producer or direct a scene
It's been a while since we've seen anything of Jarvis. Will he be appearing anytime soon, or will it be several updates before we see him again?
You are again trying to use and explain the logic linking sexual activities to automatically means not being pure - honestly, you may not realise it, but it very is close to the way moralists would talk about it. My perspective is different.
.No you're wrong. I'm just not convinced that Katherine could remain innocent in the way you seem to believe she is, bearing in mind that innocence has been shattered, by witnessing her mother get shot a few feet from her and almost dying in her arms. In those circumstances, a person could not remain innocent, because they've come face to face with evil in the form of Anthony, and had to deal with the possible loss of the most important person in their life. In the face of such adversity, how could innocence survive in a young adult who understands exactly what's going on? I just don't buy that. Katherine has had to grow up really quickly, because life has not given her any choice in the matter. So how can you claim she's still a child, when she's had to face up to a situation, even the most experienced adults would struggle with?You are again trying to use and explain the logic linking sexual activities to automatically means not being pure - honestly, you may not realise it, but it very close to the way moralists would talk about it. My perspective is different.
Even sticking to sex, I met many "bad people" (to avoid language I would otherwise use) who did even less "unconventional" and "extreme" things, and people who did that kind of stuff, yet they were naive and pure from a different perspective.
Said even more brutally, you are using a reference what happens between the legs to decide if they are pure, I do not exclude completely that, but I focus first and foremost on other elements, on the "why" as much, and for some thing even more, than the "what", and for me from that point of view Katherine is a child in young woman's body exploring sexuality.
If instead of William and Jenny (whether together or separately), she had met other people, her story could go very differently.
However, I am not trying to change your view, or of the ones that have a view closer to the one you are expressing.
Both of our points of view are legitimate, insofar as they are our points of view as individuals, just don't continue trying to explain me the perspective used by moralists, I know it perfectly from a long time, I just don't adhere to that
