- Jun 5, 2017
- 818
- 1,535
I can run Cyberpunk 2077 at 70+FPS while shooting 20 Gang members in a big City...but only can run 15-25FPS in this game while fighting 3-4 gang members in a small scene....................
- Nov 23, 2020
- 18
- 28
- Apr 10, 2019
- 80
- 55
Is there a way to make the camera movable while sex scenes are playing outside of the gallery?
I play with controller, and the thumbsticks allows you to pan and zoom.
- Oct 6, 2018
- 116
- 239
It is always a pleasure to return to this game after two years to play the new version and find out they made several retextures of the original clothing, added two characters and several sex animations and two stages. Let us fire up the fireworks in cellebration for the taxing work of this solo dev that earns thousands of US$ every month and cannot be bothered to hire professionals to help him out.
- Jun 5, 2017
- 818
- 1,535
Problem is that they supposedly do hire pros. Gifdozer definitely knows his shit and is mentioned in multiple places I think.
Now, how it exactly works from project management side of things though is very interesting. I bet it could be a case study of how to NOT manage projects of such scopes (or any scope to be honest).
Same here, honestly. I happened to have that 'I wonder if that patreon scam of a game has any updates' moment this morning when I woke up. Took a bit to finally remember this one existed on some level, but it is amazing to see that the patreon aspect was shut down finally after almost exactly six years of being the "short game" that was meant to be made to help make their original rpg game idea. You think they might bother with that rpg ever again? If it has taken 6 years for a "short game" I wonder how long an rpg will take, thirty?
- Aug 10, 2017
- 257
- 266
I played 0.102.0. The game needs improvements. The animations are pretty good. BUT
Imo, the stagger bar decreases too fast and since these enemies do not flinch when attacking them (the Brute) they spam attacks meaning you can only get a few weak punches off before having to back off or take an attack and since they have super armour they can spam H-grapples over and over again. and when you attack again the stagger bar has reset. The brute should either be a boss like the charger appearing every now and then OR have no Stagger bar and NOT mixed in with crowds of enemies.
The slide attack is inconsistent too. If its done by holding down and kick AT THE SAME TIME or else she just moves downwards and does a normal kick attack. This attack is one of two attacks in the game that can hit the small larvea. the second being at the END of the punch combo which 9/10 would be interrupted by the many larvea that spawn. meaning the slide is the ONLY quick way to deal with them but its inconsistent and should be mapped to a button instead like V or some shit. Clothes degrade too fast too.
Imo, the stagger bar decreases too fast and since these enemies do not flinch when attacking them (the Brute) they spam attacks meaning you can only get a few weak punches off before having to back off or take an attack and since they have super armour they can spam H-grapples over and over again. and when you attack again the stagger bar has reset. The brute should either be a boss like the charger appearing every now and then OR have no Stagger bar and NOT mixed in with crowds of enemies.
The slide attack is inconsistent too. If its done by holding down and kick AT THE SAME TIME or else she just moves downwards and does a normal kick attack. This attack is one of two attacks in the game that can hit the small larvea. the second being at the END of the punch combo which 9/10 would be interrupted by the many larvea that spawn. meaning the slide is the ONLY quick way to deal with them but its inconsistent and should be mapped to a button instead like V or some shit. Clothes degrade too fast too.
Please excuse ig my comment looks stupid or ignorant.
is this the latest demo version? it reads Uploaded on 2024-Apr-08 but says v0.102; and I recall the first version I was was v0.56, so I'm highly confused
0.102 is the latest. Eromancer just doesn't do versioning properly.
- Nov 23, 2020
- 18
- 28
Think of the v0.56 as v0.056 and the new v0.102 moniker makes a bit more sense chronologically/numerically.
If you can't be bothered playing the game
You must be registered to see the links
- Jun 5, 2017
- 818
- 1,535
Think of the v0.56 as v0.056 and the new v0.102 moniker makes a bit more sense chronologically/numerically.
If I tried that logic back in my hs math and IT classes, I would be a victim of homicide by the teacher.
- Mar 1, 2018
- 12
- 20
0.102 is the latest. Eromancer just doesn't do versioning properly.
You must be registered to see the links
How many programs still treat version numbers as fractional? It's just overcomplicating things.
- Nov 23, 2020
- 18
- 28
Your teacher should have taught you not to expect high school math level logic from Eromancer game development versions.