There's no need for a table. Just use basic CE functions to give Rance and Sill tons of XP. Then you can just breeze through the game. 5D is nice and comfy when you don't have to bother with the gameplay, lol.
There's no need for a table. Just use basic CE functions to give Rance and Sill tons of XP. Then you can just breeze through the game. 5D is nice and comfy when you don't have to bother with the gameplay, lol.
"
Click on the flashing icon in the top left and select your game from the process list
Type in your money value where it says Value: on the right without changing any settings and click first scan
Change your money value in game by buying or selling something, type in the new value and click next scan
If there's more than 2 or 3 found adresses repeat step 3 as needed
Select one of the remaining addresses and change the value and check if the money in game changed. If yes, edit as you like and save it. If not, select another adress and try again.
"
"
Click on the flashing icon in the top left and select your game from the process list
Type in your money value where it says Value: on the right without changing any settings and click first scan
Change your money value in game by buying or selling something, type in the new value and click next scan
If there's more than 2 or 3 found adresses repeat step 3 as needed
Select one of the remaining addresses and change the value and check if the money in game changed. If yes, edit as you like and save it. If not, select another adress and try again.
"
From what i've learned after experimenting - there's rarely an objectively bad game. It's less of a game being bad, and more of different people seeing value in different things. I myself dislike Sengoku Rance, but i can see how many people simply don't perceive the same problems i do. And i don't see what's so interesting in the things they enjoy a lot. It's so dividing in fact, that it feels like we're different sub-species of human race, rather than just people with different opinions that can change with more experience. Like with Dark Souls II, for example - it's neither good nor bad, it simply appeals to another group of sub-species.
If that's true, it would've helped devs to focus less on appealing to everyone, and more on creating a game for specific groups of people. And it's not the same as "opinions", i don't see it being that shallow of a reason for such a huge consistent difference between people.
But back to Rance 03 - it should definitely have better sex scenes at least, compared to the static pixel pictures of Rance III. If there's anything like Sill's BJ in Rance VI, it would be worth it to play. Like, that scene looks interesting, for example.
From what i've learned after experimenting - there's rarely an objectively bad game. It's less of a game being bad, and more of different people seeing value in different things.