Dom_D

Newbie
Feb 20, 2021
55
60
Arigon engages in a lot of wild speculation which he enjoys greatly. That said, Arigon's embellishments aside, the Artemis theory is based less on speculation than on the spirit of the inspirational material. The oldest, most powerful vampires of ancient times were revered as gods and often had cults dedicated to them. The oldest, most powerful vampires of ancient times are almost entirely asleep in modern times. Often times they will summon their most loyal children to guard their resting places. Sometimes they will grab the minds of unaffiliated vampires who wander too close to their underground resting places like Frank the Nos.

Now Dreamgirl fits the concept of an ancient Methuselah vampire whose mind is wandering as she sleeps, an ancient vampire old enough to have once been worshiped as a goddess. There also just happens to be a pagan temple nearby that claims that vampires are descended from the gods. Coincidence? I don't think so. Now Dreamgirl also claims to be the MC's mommy, but we know Calisto, the semi-retired hereira (Greek for priestess) of that ancient vampire worshiping temple is actually the MC's mommy.

So what is Calisto? a very very old vampire high priestess who serves an even more ancient ancestor vampire, doing here of all places? Why did she build a temple here if not to watch over the ancient ancestor vampire that commands her? What ancient ancestor vampire is she serving if not her own sire or grandsire? Dreamgirl being Calisto's sire or grandsire also reconciles Dreamgirl's familial connection to the MC despite not being his actual "mommy". Given that in Greek myth, Calisto served the maiden goddess Artemis, several of us have taken to referring the waifish and maiden-like Dreamgirl as Artemis. Artemis's tendency to hunt her would-be lovers isn't too different from how some vampires find their prey in modern days either.

I wouldn't get too wrapped up trying to match an ancient vampire who lived in pre-Christian times with the modern concept of chastity. Chastity didn't mean exactly the same thing then that it does now. She probably was embraced very young as a virginal maiden, but that didn't mean she was pure of heart or thought, or that she never ever played with her food behind closed doors after her embrace.
I like this idea also because of how the MC was turned into a vampire. I believe that him being at the temple that night was no coincidence at all, but I also believe that Callisto really turned him because she was bored. She was probably close to going into torpor voluntarily (as most ancient vampires do at times). Sometimes they even lose the will to live.
So maybe "Artemis" used the MC to keep Callisto awake, as simple as that. Who knows, the MC may look like someone in Callisto's past (think Mina in Bram Stoker's novel), or have a personality or a job or name or "aura" or whatever else (being a pushover and dumb? :p) that they know will have some interest for Callisto.

I don't like "superhero" stories, I don't want the MC being OP and THE center of the events just because an author made him so, so this would be something I enjoy... ;) Him being chosen for something so simple and "low".
Callisto is the most important piece on the board for Artemis and she needs her awake. Especially as Artemis is probably about to wake up from a long sleep either under the city or under the small town of which Sharon is Archon now. Of course if things are like that now the MC should keep his role as amusement for Callisto and at the same time he can be used for other purposes.

If she is in that small town, it's even more probable that the feral was her work and probably the being in the woods is a guardian of some kind or instead something that is searching for her (but that means others already know that she is there... I don't think so). If so the disappearance of the Nos is probably linked, maybe the Nos secret refuge was too close to Artemis...
 
Last edited:

FunFuntomes

Engaged Member
Mar 24, 2021
2,506
3,778
I don't like "superhero" stories, I don't want the MC being OP and THE center of the events just because an author made him so, so this would be something I enjoy... ;) Him being chosen for something so simple and "low".
Callisto is the most important piece on the board for Artemis and she needs her awake. Especially as Artemis is probably about to wake up from a long sleep either under the city or under the small town of which Sharon is Archon now. Of course if things are like that now the MC should keep his role as amusement for Callisto and at the same time he can be used for other purposes.
well... MC can be the chosen one, and still not be the strongest vampire in existence. all the powers in the world mean nothing if he doesn't know how and when to use those. plus he's still subjected to the vampiric laws.
 

Warscared

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2021
1,808
11,231
The thing is, with my thought processes running through this, I think we collaboratively hit on truthful things more often than not. Do my mental meanderings sometimes venture to the extreme? Well some would say that the Astrid theory was wild.

Truth be told though, that was not an original concept. As I mentioned before, Loki would use his trickster abilities frequently to cause harm, and occasionally to do good. These included posing as a fish, as a woman, as a giant, and as ravens (and many other things). Loki was reputed to have many childer, not all of them at all nice! The idea that Astrid could be affiliated with those other "gods" was not that far fetched nor was her proposed plot. It seems that with the resolution of the second chapter, that Virgil may in fact be the Him, so Astrid is off the table which pleases many folks, Ayhsel more than most I would wager! :D Yet now Virgil/Plubius is now suspect.

The idea of Artemis does not depend on what the Goddess embodied so much as how that myth could be used to explain relationships amongst the vampires. In that role, the virginity of Artemis, and for that matter Calisto who had sworn herself to virginity, only to have it robbed by Zeus and fathering Arcus on her, is really not so applicable to VAMPIRES. A Vampire is a monster by our terminology. Calisto certainly is no longer chaste, and Artemis, if she was at one time pure, is no longer pure. No vampire, even Sharon, stays pure. You have the BEAST ravening within you as a vampire. And it always wins at least some of the battles, no matter how pure your intentions may be.

BigStuffedTiger does raise a point that I like to propose out of the box ideas, which entertain me greatly, and at least some of our fellow posters have a good time with them as well. I would wager that many of my coffee induced, or gawd forbid Mountain Dew induced visions, do tend to certain extremes, and yet they are entertaining and some grain of possibility does exist in them all. The graciousness of the group in taking in my ideas and agreeing or disagreeing is a trademark of this thread pretty much alone... it is a very welcoming and forgiving place where we all have fun. It needs to keep that trademark. It is singularly wonderful, and full of wonderful folks.
To each of you I give my thanks.

Artemis Rising-(and other meanderings)

What follows is "pure conjecture". *Popcorn times my friends*

As many of us have stated in the past, Calisto being the head of a pagan church poised over the city where her ancient sire is buried is not something beyond the realm of possibility. In fact it seems to become more likely all the time.

Who is Calisto- In Greek times, she was a nymph, one of the senior and most powerful and alluring of that group, who swore her loyalty to Artemis and like her virgin mistress swore chastity. Calisto is not a teenager, or even young 20s nymph looking woman. She is MILF like, as the tag states in the game heading. She is beautiful, almost beyond compare. She is the head of a church which has some number of select and important members. It is very unlikely that they are as potent as she is, because let's face it, that many Methuselahs would be draining the city population of vampires dry in just a few nights. (Quick reminder that there were a number of 4th generation vampires running around in the WoD stories so having them here is not that far fetched-again this is not related directly to that work, but clearly it is partially inspired by it)

Yes I believe she is powerful enough and ancient enough that she likely must feed on vampire blood (mortal blood will of course be something she will drink for fun or whatever, and in the case of our main character, she drained him dry). So she likely mixes up a nice batch of numerous vampires she is loyal to and wants to protect (quasi Vaulderie), or (more likely) she has other vampires create children for her to devour whole-thus avoiding any unfortunate entanglements.... She would not put herself into a position of being thralled or bound to anyone. (OR most likely she is already thralled to her mistress Artemis- as such power of the blood transcends the normal rules on blood binding) ***Side note- it is said in the WoD that Caine has ghouls which are alive from pre First City times to the modern nights, that are out doing his bidding, as powerful as any vampire they meet, but never having to feed again, having become super revenants of a sort!!(these super revenants may in fact be related to, or inspirational in how the WoD Tzimisce learned to create revenants in their times)

Calisto's powers likely mirror those the MC has manifested so far, plus several others. She demonstrated Domination early on, when ordering the reluctant MC to follow her. So that is also in her arsenal. More on that in a bit, lets talk about the Temple:

Temple-
She exercises her reputation and secrecy to found a neutral ground, sacred place, The Temple where any vampire willing to pay the price may come and enjoy complete safety, work out deals, have disagreements of words only, make pacts, enjoy blood dolls, and of course pay Cindy compliments for the services provided, while usually never laying eyes on the true Power which makes the Temple the Sanctum of Peace that it is. As for the role of Calisto, she probably exercises her power not unlike the way a king-maker does, by having a "Face" even if she is that face, in another guise or illusionary appearance. As the Arbiter of such conflicts or issues, the price will always be blood, and likely a great deal of blood. Vampire Blood. Likely stored by a process that the Templars have in storing and preserving vampire blood.

Thus one of the tie ins for why she keeps Fabian personally, and his associated folks fed, and in her fold on a leash of blood, perhaps at the request of her sire's relationship to Apollo and his children which would work its way down to the Templars. Look up to my bold and underlined title here for the reason why she is collecting such a vast quantity of Vitae (will use that and vampire blood interchangeably- could also use Vampire Ichor and that would be as correct. If Artemis is in fact the progenitor of her own bloodline/clan, she will be very very powerful and depending on how long she has been down, quite thirsty. Thus the reason for a temple, where vampires know they can go in absolute safety for a goodly dose of their blood, not only explains why she is there, why the temple is there, why she supplies blood dolls, why we are in some Western European or North American city instead of the Middle East. If Artemis wanted to sleep undisturbed, without the almost assured threat of being hunted, why not go outside the traditional haunts of the Ancients to dig your Sanctum of Solitude for your long rest?

Calisto- *** part of the myth associated with Calisto involves a rather convoluted story of lust/love, betrayal and consequences, ending with redemption, soooo :

Calisto was the high priestess of Artemis, and content in that role. Zeus, that horny old fuck, came to her, seduced (He was the master of seduction) and fathered a childe with her. While that does not, in and of itself, fit into a vampire tale so to speak, it does. Vampires in this game may have sex, and according to Virgil, they all screw each other at some point or another. Likely Artemis had embraced and loved Calisto as a favored childe. She placed her as her high priestess/chief guardian, and all was well. Artemis' sire Zeus (paternal figure of Artemis and Apollo the twins-Artemis as the elder) came along and had an affair of the traditional sort with Calisto, perhaps encouraging her to embrace her first childe, a promising young warrior Arcus, as Zeus loved to meddle in the affairs of those he loved and or had a relationship of family over, or hated, or just thought they would be a good roll in the hay, as I said; Zeus is a horny old fuck!

Arcus was no doubt a lot like our MC, which is probably why the MC was chosen. Gifted in musical talents, smart, with a good physique and great looks, he would have been a great catch for many of the fellow vampire nymphs, but Zeus wanted her to have this one, for him.

Arcus quickly grew to meet his vampiric potential and was a source of pride for Zeus who had picked him out, and for Calisto as his Sire. *** this is an important note- Some folks have raised the length of time and pain associated with the embrace of the MC as a sign that Calisto has difficulty in siring childer. I do not believe this to be the case. After the failure of Arcus, she simply did not embrace another childe as in her view it would be more trouble than it is worth. The length and pain associated with it could simply be that the extreme power of that blood relationship required a rewriting of the MC's body/DNA so thorough (which other vampires in modern nights do not have that difficulty as they are like 10-15th generation and the difference in the bodies and minds are there, they just are not as completely different or powerful) So the "difficulty" and "lengthy process" were due to the crazy power being imbued in our MC. Back to Arcus etc-

(Probably around the time Calisto was embraced, Apollo was embracing the witch Hekate who has been tied to him through myth - I note this so I can tie in Fabian shortly)....

Hera-Wife of Zeus and fellow member of his generation (2nd) ((Cronus the Titan being their line's founder if you will, as 1st generation-remember we are not proposing that LB is in any way infringing on the copywrite of WoD materials, but certain concepts of that line of games have an almost universal application and may be "used" carefully- so Forget Caine and Lilith as those are related to Jewish and Christian faiths and tenants of the Vampire the Masquerade line of products- Nos is widely enough used in myth as to be more or less open territory, but Shreknet is not.))

Titans appear in many if not most ancient religions and are set as antagonist of the more "modern" gods. This is particularly true of Greek and Norse mythology, which completely use Titans as loving, hating, creepy, cthonic (Not Cthulu, but blood cults which are a very Osiris type of vampire cult thing to do), progenitors and enemies almost identically.
Anyway Hera, a power unto herself, was having difficulty with yet another infidelity of her mate Zeus. So as a punishment she cursed Calisto with a beast form she could assume as well; A Bear. Another name for Calisto in fact is Ursa Major, and Arcus is Ursa Minor. This came about due to Arcus hunting Calisto while in her bear form. Some tales say he succeeded in his hunt, and others (the majority) state Zeus became aware of his jealous wife's mischief and saved Artemis and spared Arcus. To signify this traumatic event, he set Arcus in the Sky as Ursa Minor and Artemis as Ursa Major. How that renders in to vampire speak is most likely Zeus stopped Arcus from diablerizing Calisto. Consequences being Calisto did not want another childe to hunt her so she abstained. Arcus- we do not know what his fate may be as he vanished. Most likely hiding his true identify and changing his appearance and demeanor to fit the times and his needs.. ***Could He BE VIRGIL?????

Some predictions and conclusions thus far:

So if Artemis is rising, those in her bloodline will know. Frank was just a crazy Nos who got too close to finding the entrance to her Sanctum, so she has warped him and sent him on wild goose chases.
Calisto will have known for a long time, and is thus collecting a shit ton of vampire blood to feed the starving Artemis. She was Melancholy with this task, because being bound to someone, and even loving them, does not mean that you're happy with what they do and what that means for you. Also being bored, caring for her sire for eons could well have tired out her patience and her psyche. Artemis, using such tools as Kassandra aka Malia (Most likely a member of very observant and talented clan not unlike Malkavians, as she was reputed to have the gift of visions/prophesy but to never be believed, beautiful, but ultimately insane) to screen potential candidates for her reluctant daughter to embrace. She no doubt had others looking as well, and finally having chosen the MC, made the necessary arrangements to have him play music at one of the Sacred Temple's arbitration meetings.
So when Calisto met the MC, she became intrigued, and gave in to the temptation, since he closely resembled what attracted her to Arcus, and even making almost resigned comments on what the gods do and why, she embraced him.

Fabian- if the Templars can store vampire blood as I suspect, he not only handles this for his liege he is sworn to, but he brokers such treasures to other vampires in the city, which gives him and his clan/bloodline, respect amongst the elders, while the youngsters have no clue as they see no outward signs of great magical work. (poor deluded Sharon).

So yes, Fabian pushed for the Princeps to support the creation of a new domain, and placing young Sharon in charge. This makes the Princeps nervous, but more importantly, it makes Virgil/Publius/Arcus??? more curious, paranoid and suspicious.

If Virgil is Him, our MC better get really tough REALLY fast. If Anne Rice is a source at all, the MC is likely a more powerful embrace than Arcus, which would be the only reason he has a shot at taking him on.....

Ok there is my treatise for today.
Peace all!
the name Templar, Fabian stated she as not reproduced in 700 years which is the time when the Templar got destroyed after the crusades failure... there a part of your story missing! Artemis lost a war against someone or perhaps Apollo lost that war and Artemis retreated into a new place taking her brothers Templar with her in expectancy for a new confrontation!

since we know she reproduced 700 years ago perhaps she created a neo that failed his mission or at least gained them enough time to retreat without too many losses!

i used the matrix reference because in the last movie and in the books neo was not unique only the one that finally got the job "done" so to speak! so perhaps this is a recurrent theme where some strong pantheon perhaps even the Persian one with Azura Mazda chase down the Greek pantheon into oblivion and once in a while a few strong weapons need to be crafted to make them "understand" that such a war will be costly!

the melding on pantheons can even be described as a war amongst the gods with new alliances being created all the time such as the melding of the greek and roman pantheons! one could even state that the roman wars against the Phoenicians and Egyptians was what started the war with the "eastern pantheon"! since the Carthaginians where middle easterners and the Egyptians where close to the middle east!

crazy theories cray cray!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arigon

Arigon

Engaged Member
Aug 27, 2020
2,296
4,535
but could Frank be part of Artemis's bloodline?

in the myths she was cursed by Apollo....
No, Frank is a Nos. She is definitely not a Nos.
Yes, Kassandra was cursed by Apollo for (depending on version) not falling for him. The curse was that no one would believe her prophetic visions.
 

Arigon

Engaged Member
Aug 27, 2020
2,296
4,535
the name Templar, Fabian stated she as not reproduced in 700 years which is the time when the Templar got destroyed after the crusades failure...
I do not recall Fabian ever saying this. I have replayed a bunch and never got that detailed a number for how long, nor that it was related to the Templar failures.... Can you explain how you got him to say this?
thanks!
 

Warscared

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2021
1,808
11,231
I do not recall Fabian ever saying this. I have replayed a bunch and never got that detailed a number for how long, nor that it was related to the Templar failures.... Can you explain how you got him to say this?
thanks!
1st time you met Fabian after the shadow show he said its been 700 years since she last reproduced! 700 years ago when the Templar got destroyed in most of western Europe! they had already fallen in the middle east! 1312 was the year! most of their properties where seized by the different crowns particularly England and France, many new orders where created to replace them like the knights of Christ in Portugal i think another order was created in Scotland and whatever was left mainly in Cyprus Rhodes and Malta where given to the hospitallar order!
 
  • Like
Reactions: D3xzalias

whichone

Forum Fanatic
Jan 3, 2018
4,915
10,320
Artemis is Theory nothing more and entire fan community here dont know about what temple and ancient pagan gods we speak here :D theory is crafed only she mention boredom of greek gods :)
In order to qualify as a theory, it must first be plausible.
It is not plausible to suggest that a sexualised vampire is a lifelong virgin goddess, who is directly & specifically associated with chastity throughout her written history.
The two positions are obviously directly contrary.

I spoke about the major aspects of Artemis' character which do not fit with the seductive, sexualised vamp we see in Vision girl.
As Vision girl doesn't share these major character aspects she cannot possibly be Artemis, by logical deductive reasoning.
Tiger Woods is a golfer. I have never played golf, ergo I cannot be Tiger Woods.

The only discernible connection, is that they both happen to have a cohort named Calisto.
That's a really large leap to arrive at the conclusion that she is Artemis, simply because of this.
I have a friend named Ben, this doesn't make me Matt Damon.
By exactly the same remit, a cohort called Calisto doesn't make her Artemis.

There are plenty of things against her being Artemis & only one, extremely loose, 3rd party link in favour, which doesn't stand up to scrutiny, as just shown.
So, actually, there is nothing in favour of her being Artemis.


She has not one single resemblance to the established, well documented character of Artemis.
Logical conclusion: She is, quite obviously, not Artemis.
 
Last edited:

Warscared

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2021
1,808
11,231
In order to qualify as a theory, it must first be plausible.
It is not plausible to suggest that a sexualised vampire is a lifelong virgin goddess, who is directly & specifically associated with chastity throughout her written history.
The two positions are obviously directly contrary.

I spoke about the major aspects of Artemis' character which do not fit with the seductive, sexualised vamp we see in Vision girl.
As Vision girl doesn't share these major character aspects she cannot possibly be Artemis, by logical deductive reasoning.
Tiger Woods is a golfer. I have never played golf, ergo I cannot be Tiger Woods.

The only discernible connection, is that they both happen to have a cohort named Calisto.
That's a really large leap to arrive at the conclusion that she is Artemis, simply because of this.
I have a friend named Ben, this doesn't make me Matt Damon.
By exactly the same remit, a cohort called Calisto doesn't make her Artemis.

There are plenty of things against her being Artemis & only one, extremely loose, 3rd party link in favour, which doesn't stand up to scrutiny, as just shown.
So, actually, there is nothing in favour of her being Artemis.


She has not one single resemblance to the established, well documented character of Artemis.
Logical conclusion: She is, quite obviously, not Artemis.
what about vampire virgins just mean never been enthralled?
 
  • Like
Reactions: D3xzalias

c3p0

Forum Fanatic
Respected User
Nov 20, 2017
5,405
12,860
Logical conclusion is: We don't know.
The Greeks good are from a time periode 2000 years ago. We only have some writtings and pictures about this. Same for the whole Christian tale and other things.
I think that what we (you and I also think diffrently) think about them is not what they had thought about them.

More than that I don't assume to know.

And a purley speculative question whichone: If she would be identified (canon, game wise) as Ἄρτεμις/Artemis, the Greek goddess of the hunt, the wilderness, wild animals, the Moon, and chastity, would that change things?
 
Last edited:

whichone

Forum Fanatic
Jan 3, 2018
4,915
10,320
And a purley speculative question whichone: If she would be identified (canon, game wise) as Ἄρτεμις/Artemis, the Greek goddess of the hunt, the wilderness, wild animals, the Moon, and chastity, would that change things?
Good Q.
It would make it correct as far as the author is concerned. Still wouldn't match anything that is written in the stories of Artemis.
If a fictional book told you that Black was White, does that change the facts about those 2 colours being what they are?
I'd say that the absence of colour is still Black & the accumulation of all colours is still White.
 

c3p0

Forum Fanatic
Respected User
Nov 20, 2017
5,405
12,860
If a fictional book told you that Black was White, does that change the facts about those 2 colours being what they are?
I'd say that the absence of colour is still Black & the accumulation of all colours is still White.
For all I know, I put the Bible (or Greeks good) as much in to the fictional part of the library as it belongs to the history section.

So the question would be more, if a discovery would be made that tells Artimes was a men (or whatever), then which do you believe?

White and Black is defined. We can redefine it, as time does with a lot of words from our language.
 
Last edited:
  • Red Heart
Reactions: Warscared

whichone

Forum Fanatic
Jan 3, 2018
4,915
10,320
For all I know, I put the Bible (or Greeks good) as much in to the fictional part of the library as it belongs to the history section.
They are works of fiction, indisputably.
Some details have changed, depending on author.
Her character traits are consistently written as they are.
So the question would be more, if a discovery would be made that tells Artimes was a men (or whatever), then which do you believe?
How can a discovery be made about a fictional character?
This is a strawman.
Her character has been written about and is etsablished.
If someone new want to call their character Artemis, then she must share the same character.
This vamp does not.
White and Black is defined. We can redefine it, as time does with a lor of words from our language.
So are Artemis' character traits.
End of the day, if the character in this story does not share a single, not one, attribute of Artemis' well documented character, then it's entrirely illogical to suggest that she is Artemis.
 
  • Red Heart
Reactions: Warscared

c3p0

Forum Fanatic
Respected User
Nov 20, 2017
5,405
12,860
How can a discovery be made about a fictional character?
This is a strawman.
Her character has been written about and is etsablished.
If someone new want to call their character Artemis, then she must share the same character.
This isn't our tale. The Artemis tale was told age ago. Nothing suggest that we know all things about as it is true for the opposite.
So are Artemis' character traits.
End of the day, if the character in this story does not share a single, not one, attribute of Artemis' well documented character, then it's entrirely illogical to suggest that she is Artemis.
I do see it a bit different and accept more liberty to her character.

But enough, I agree to disagree. Also I don't put any of mine nuts on the block (others can do that) and for the story, it don't see that of an impact if she is Artemis or not, but I tend to believe she is at the current time.;)
 
  • Red Heart
Reactions: Warscared

whichone

Forum Fanatic
Jan 3, 2018
4,915
10,320
This isn't our tale. The Artemis tale was told age ago. Nothing suggest that we know all things about as it is true for the opposite.

I do see it a bit different and accept more liberty to her character.
Please. If I included a character and named it c3po, yet it was not a droid, not highly logical and presenting probabilities of success, not sharing a single of c3po's established character traits, it would be contrary to established character.
Same as this is.
But enough, I agree to disagree. Also I don't put any of mine nuts on the block (others can do that) and for the story, it don't see that of an impact if she is Artemis or not, but I tend to believe she is at the current time.;)
Based on what? There is not a single shred of supporting evidence to corroborate this belief.
Nothing matches, at all.
That's like saying I believe the sky is purple.
It doesn't matter what I believe, it's quite obviously not.
 
  • Red Heart
Reactions: Warscared

c3p0

Forum Fanatic
Respected User
Nov 20, 2017
5,405
12,860
From a writter perspective it is know that some of them change things. Dürrenmat was one of them, he change some maps to be more in faviour with his story (if I recall it right, it was the judge and his hangman).

If I would use your train of thoughs then his story would be base on some clear mistake and logically, would be void at all.

Same goes for any other media that is based on another media. Seldom all things etablished in the story periously will be translated one to one. Thus they all could also be void, as the aren't following the source.

In my eyes is the ride I want to enjoy and for almost any work, I give the benefit of doubt as long as the author of the same work doen't entrap himself in contradistinction or inconsistency - Although Rebirth has some consistency.

So if a map work better for an author without a lake in it, I'm OK, as long as the lake don't pop up in the next chapter.
 
Last edited:
  • Red Heart
  • Like
Reactions: Dom_D and Warscared

whichone

Forum Fanatic
Jan 3, 2018
4,915
10,320
If I would use your train of thoughs then his story would be base on some clear mistake and logically, would be void at all.
No it would not. How could it possibly? His story has never made the claim.
Showing why the claim is not possibly correct does not affect the story.
Only the suggestion that she is Artemis is affected by this. The story does not suggest this at any point.

The only thing that is wrong, when you follow established traits of Artemis' character, is the suggestion that she is the vision girl. Because she does not share a single character attribute.
It's therefore totally illogical to suggest that she is.

Artemis is goddess of the hunt.
Artemis is a symbol of chastity. Being chaste is not only about sexual activity. It is also about not having any desire for sexual activity, which is clearly written in Artemis' character.
Artemis is associated with caring for mothers, assisting them with childbirth.
Artemis is a lifelong virgin, by her own choice.
Artemis does not seek the favour or company of men, or male gods.

None of these are known traits of vision girl.
 
  • Red Heart
Reactions: Warscared
4.00 star(s) 212 Votes