- Jan 3, 2018
- 4,915
- 10,324
They are all hunters, so by this logic they are all Artemis.Vampire are creatures of the night and they certainly hunt. Therefore I would say, this point is the one I say it fulfilled.
Again, whichaspect contradict this? She only haunt us in here dream and I don't see them as seeking favour from us.
No, quite obviously they are not.
As already said, many times, being chaste does not require sexual activity.Recall from my memory, so can be wrong per se, I don't seen here in (yet) in any form of sexual activity.
Appearing in next to no clothing is, by very definition of the word, not chaste behaviour.
Yes. By appearing as a sexualised being, to make him resist her less, as is commonly found in most vampire canon.She is for me trying to cozen the MC to some plan of her.
Loads of vampires are sexually attractive to their victims.
Artemis does not make herself sexually attractive, for anyone.
Artemis is not a Mother.Yes, but which aspect contradict this? If she is a clan founder, woudn't that be the stroking image for a mother?
At no point has anyone said that she was.
What she does, is assist mothers during pregnancy and childbirth.
I didn't say this aspect was contradicted.
I said it does not exist, with vision girl. There is no sign or reference to her doing this, at all.
If you are now saying that vision girl is, effectively, the mother of the clan, then this is simply another reason why she is not Artemis.
See above.Again, whichaspect contradict this? Virginity is only a biological aspect. From what I read fromYou must be registered to see the linksI don't see that it must mean more than the biological aspect. And this condition could be fulfilled or not, I don't have evidence for either. And I don't give Virgils "everyone has fucked everyone someday" much credit.
It is not contradicted.
It is not present.
It is not present and nothing has suggested that it ever will be, then it's a bit ridiculous to rely on it.
Had it been stated that she wished for & was granted virginity, from Zeus, as a child then you would have a valid claim.
The fact that it has not been, means that you currently do not.
The fact that she has returned to see us again is more than enough to say she is seeking our company when she appears to us.Again, which aspect contradict this? She only haunt us in here dream and I don't see them as seeking favour from us.
Something Artemis would never, ever do in this manner.
When Artemis appeared to men, she had something to say, or do. Often involving kicking their asses.
Not seductively rolling around in next to no clothing being, quite specifically, unchaste.
Perhaps it would be clearer if I said:
"No character attributes from Artemis' long documented history are specifically present & one is directly contradicted."
With the lack of all known attributes being present and the contradiction of one major one, it's pretty clear that we cannot claim that she is Artemis, with any validity.
Nothing at all supports this conclusion, other than a 3rd party who shares a name.
Last edited: