No, it is every one that use an client that is not on the whitelist - and that are a lot of users who asked the same thing again and again
.
I assume the reason is, that is isn't FOSS (free and open source software).
Yes, it somehow slipped past me.
Tixati has a long history of not reporting data properly, google "why is tixati blacklisted" and you'll see. Plus, obviously not open source.
Afaik those problem were fixed years ago, and all the listed clients do not offer proper download support to NAS, the only solution they offer is to "Move the torrent client to the NAS", when the NAS has no internet access, which isn't a solution.
Might be fixed, might not be - either way it's not open source so can't tell. Why not just setup a simple rsync script to copy files from the downloaded folder to the NAS?
I am not interested in doing work arounds when I can have something that work correctly. Obviously I use my torrent client elsewhere, so the fact that 20gb would the largest game here is irrelevant. So 80gb here, 100gb there, 8gb there, this all adds up as space I need to allocate to my download machine, which I am not interested in.
Just giving you a workaround - if you're uninterested I'm really not sure what to say.
Nah, it's very much alive. Are you sure you're using a whitelisted client?
Im using qbittorrent. I have also used your torrents before.
It's the client that's out of date.
All good, the reason for 4.3.9 was that was most recent when client whitelisting was implemented.
It's going up now, but I don't post misc torrents anymore, you can grab it on the discord if you want or somebody might post it here.
