Nice game and aesthetics. Really fun to play and look at! Too bad this "forced feminization" kink is getting so popular all around and it seems that being turned into a woman is something shameful. I hope one day to find a game where feminization is not something humiliating but something fun and well developed insted of "oh, a my girl so imma thot now"
You can't be forced to something that you want anyways.
The problem with these two particular transformation games is that while they may seem transgender-friendly, they nevertheless perpetuate the conviction that changing sexual roles, orientation and identity can be a result of socio-environmental pressure, meaning you can be turned into a woman (yes, it's male-to-female transition that is fetishized in 99% of TS themed games) through blackmail from your superior combined with dubious psychotherapy and sometimes rape. The entire fantasy looses most of its appeal to a lot of fans when the premise becomes purely voluntary. It has to be forced-but-they-wanted-it-anyways, right? And it feels somehow neutered without a healthy dose of good old incest.
In all honesty, do you really expect a company whose main area of interest is not very niche pornography featuring illegal sexual activities to support such games? Yes, forced or otherwise unsolicited sex activity is considered illegal in most civilized countries and so is incest, sex with minors and bestiality. Would you really like dog to human sex, pegging from mom and penis shrinking at the behest of your female boss to become such mainstream fetishes that no one even considers protesting sale and distribution of such content?
I think you *can* be raped until you like it. This is a transformation.
Most males of many species don't get to breed because they failed at the competition with other males for mates. They want to mate, but somehow can't.
Whether you as a human male win this competition or lose depends heavily on the environment you find yourself in. A winner at adult life may have been a loser in a more artificial school environment, and it may have formed more or less permanently their self image as a loser whatever else they achieve later for instance. In a prison, nobody gets to mate. Or in a hunter gatherer tribe, having most of your women stolen by raids by the neighboring tribe may have left you with few opportunities to find a mate, or maybe they're just being monopolised by the 'big-men' who have harems. Or maybe all the women get knocked up by the same few 'Chads' from Tinder who although they are not particularly 'big-men' they have big cocks and the state pays to help women raise their ill-begotten spawn by taxing the men the women have rejected so the women don't need a 'good man' anyway.
These unsatisfied males in history have had to steal mates from other tribes when none were available in their own society. They've become soldiers, and perhaps societies that have concentrated wealth ( and mates ) have produced more of these than other societies which has helped those societies make war on and steal women from and steal resources and land from societies that produce fewer unstatisfied males, though it has also been advantageous for each male to contribute resources to raising their own family which they do when they have their own mate and can be reasonably sure their children are their own. Unless men who have failed to find a mate are made into slaves of men and women who do mate, this contribution will not be forthcoming. In some African tribes the 'father' is less important than the woman's brother ( uncle ) because women screw lots of fathers, but uncles ( on the mother's side ) are sure they are at least the woman's half brother and so are at least somewhat related to her children. So they have genetic interest in contributing ( though far less interest than a male who knows he's the father )
Maximum voluntary male contribution to raising of children comes in the case when males know their children are their own. These societies win out when this is important.
Anyway, we see that the ranks of warriors are essentially the ranks of unsatisfied males. Sure satisfied males have an interest in defending what they have, but unsatisfied males are out for plunder.
As a *male* you have a duty to try and find a mate if you don't have one, or defend your mate and family if you have one. This duty is to your genetic lineage. You can also altruistically defend or otherwise work to benefit your family and people. You further your genetic lineage perhaps more if you sacrifice your life to enable your people to increase generally than if you had a family of your own, although whether your sacrifice really benefited your people that much is usually highly debatable.
We see though that part of being male involves duty and strife. To *choose* not to me male smacks of shirking one's duty, and that has always been shameful.
And being a slave has never been a position of honour. Working to pay taxes that go to help raise some Tinder 'playah's spawn grown in the womb of the woman that was never your wife, or paying taxes to some rich man who has a harem of women that were never your wife is a cucked thing. And it doesn't satisfy the human need for love and contact. It's cold and lonely and it's he position many many males find themselves in.
It's no wonder that these males fantasize about a woman who would have a pet human slave. It's much better than being another livestock in the barn. Having her take the time to interact and to shape you is better than letting 'society' filter you into the salt mines where she never even knows you exist ( yet enjoys the salt you mine ).
And while the natural competition between males feels like being funneled into a role as a slave ( unless you fight it and win ) it's cold and uncaring. How tempting to fall into the clutches of a woman who will nonetheless shape you for her benefit, but will at least care about you enough to take pleasure in tormenting you.
You're not going to attract a lot of female mates wearing a dress. It puts you out of the running. And what is respect for if not that ( as a male )? Twisting your mind to accept losing your chance to win a female mate is giving up and is shameful. It's shameful for a male to act like a sissy. Sissy is an insult males originally flung at each other after all.
I am not going to argue that people who think they were 'born in the wrong body' or were 'born gay' are not. I would lose that argument if I said I know this for sure because I cannot read their mind and can never know for sure. But there is an alternate explanation that also fits:
An alternate theory is this: They've twisted their worldview to allow them to escape their duties as a male and not feel guilt and mental anguish. Perhaps , but truly think they were born this way. Maybe from an early age they've presented an affect that kept them from being expected to compete and so kept them out of the running. Maybe this affect was encouraged purposely or not by people in their lives. Maybe it was just easier not to be expected to act masculine or compete as a male and so they always did it from so early on it seems as if it were always so.
I can see why such people might feel that they never made a choice, but they're alien hypothetical psyches to me and as far as I can know, they might not even be real. As far as I can know, this sort of thing could be a twisted delusion some people nurture so they don't have to feel the guilt of giving up.
Gender identities other than male and female, and sex change could plausibly be self serving fantasies of certain men. I need not participate or indulge them.
For others who see themselves as men, putting on a dress and prancing around like a sissy IS shameful. And shame is hot if it's part of what binds you to a relationship of some sort, even if it is an unbalanced one. Nobody else is interested in a man wearing a dress. Making him wear it mark him as HERS
I hate it when people ruin shame. Muh people should be able to run around dressed like total whores etc and nobody should judge them for it etc..
Yes they should! And how the fuck can you BE judged if you want to be if everything you do is totally find and not shameful? It drains the sex out of everything. Removing all consequences removes the MEANING from everything generally. It makes a grey world I don't want to live in.
