I don't believe the quest tells you to do this and definitely do NOT do it. If you can point out where it says to do this please let me know and I will definitely change it in the next version.
yeah, as Squirrel said. If you want cat girls, there are a few mods that have them or you could create your own!
Es que si se llama sexbot y todas las chicas parecen humanas,¿ cual seria la diferencia con los demás juegos que tienen chicas humanas ? Es solo una opinion, hubiera sido bueno si tuvieran una apariencia estilo Saber Marionette, con lineas en las articulaciones. Saludos
I understand why you expect this but the human appearance is what I want to do. In the game these are supposed to be sexbots one hundred years from now and they are very good. Bots and parts in the game are rated by letter with "F" being the lowest quality and "A" being high quality. The "S" rating is considered "Special" so it is better quality than "A". The game does not have any "F" or "E" rated bots in it now. If I decide to make "F" or "E" rated bots the "E" rated bots will look more like what you expect with lines or seams and the "F" rated bots will probably not even look human, they will look mechanical. I'm not sure anyone would want to use an "F" rated sexbot!
No, the stability loss is proportional to the change in other characteristics. For example, whenever your bot gains a LOT of skill in training it will also lose a LOT of stability. Conversely whenever your bot gains only a SMALL amount of skill in training it will also lose only a SMALL amount of stability.
So for bots that I have maxed out on stats I should give them low CPUs so I don't have to keep stabilizing them so often.No, the stability loss is proportional to the change in other characteristics. For example, whenever your bot gains a LOT of skill in training it will also lose a LOT of stability. Conversely whenever your bot gains only a SMALL amount of skill in training it will also lose only a SMALL amount of stability.
Indirectly a low quality CPU does result in a bot losing less stability during training but this is only because they gain less skill from the training. It is not a good strategy to use lower quality CPUs. This will take a longer time and use a lot more AP because you will have to repeat the training many more times.
FYI; Each bot has a rating that affects stability loss. For example, the "D" rated "AGRX-10" bot has a very good rating and loses much less stability than most other bots. Too bad it's only a "D" rated bot!
I had not thought of that but it might be a good strategy for bots you want to keep. If you are selling bots the price you get is proportional to part quality so you might want to put a better CPU back when you sell the bot. Also, if you intend to send the bot to the UFC (fight club) lower quality CPUs will result in losing fights. Your bot will be "outsmarted" by the opponent. I don't think lower quality CPUs affect other missions and actions but I'm not certain.
You'll just have to purchase the capsule upgrades to maintain bot stability! Definitely gonna abuse this for awhile before you patch it.I had not thought of that but it might be a good strategy for bots you want to keep. If you are selling bots the price you get is proportional to part quality so you might want to put a better CPU back when you sell the bot. Also, if you intend to send the bot to the UFC (fight club) lower quality CPUs will result in losing fights. Your bot will be "outsmarted" by the opponent. I don't think lower quality CPUs affect other missions and actions but I'm not certain.
You should take advantage of your observation now because I will change this in a future version! I will do this by making the outcomes of more activities proportional to the CPU quality. You'll get the improvement in stability loss but the bot will not be as useful. After all, you can't run good AI software on low quality hardware today so why should a bot which must be running AI software be able to do it?
Sorry, things like that are frustrating. Been there done that, probably will do it again some time too!
I believe you mean 'manage' not 'damage', right? I'm sorry but I made a mistake and left out some information when describing the 'Bot Manager' role requirements in the game. The requirement for A+ social skill is listed and is required to assign the role but there are additional requirements for the bot to carry out the function. A 'Bot Manager' must have 100% integrity and be "stable" (>=75% stability) to function. They will not perform the role in any turn where they do not meet both requirements and you'll get the message. I'll add this information to the role description in the next version. Sorry.
the "F" rated bots will probably not even look human, they will look mechanical. I'm not sure anyone would want to use an "F" rated sexbot!
