Wait. am I reading this right? Lesbian NTR?
SIGN ME UP!
SIGN ME UP!
- Nov 20, 2018
- 10,972
- 15,855
Don't get me wrong: I'm not upset or frustrated at all, either with this discussion or the game itself. I'm still really liking the game. I hope it didn't come across as a rant or anything; I've been enjoying our discussions, too.
This was what I was trying to say; sorry that I didn't clearly express it before. If it were just a case of the MC being too spineless to move things forward with a LI, I wouldn't have a problem with the sister saying anything. He has no claim on Kylie if he's not willing to put himself out there. But in this extreme circumstance where moving forward with Kylie means killing her, I don't think the sister should've thought like that. She knows the reason the MC hasn't done anything, so she should be understanding.
If it were my own sister and I felt like she was always flirting with my girlfriends, especially if it felt like she might potentially steal them, I would love talking with her on the phone but never seeing her IRL. That may sound heartless, but it's fact. If I were in love, I wouldn't want anyone, especially family, trying to take my lover away from me.
And I wasn't trying to say there was NTR; I was saying that it felt like some kind of grey area in the middle, and initially for me it wasn't pleasant.
I actually agree with you on many of the benefits of the sister's involvement. (I'm neutral on the bisexuality part; I'm fine either way.) I'm not sure I see the sister's involvement necessarily as a catalyst to all of the girls eventually accepting the MC after the curse is gone; it's possible but not a foregone conclusion. It could be a good thing.
Now that things have shifted in the game, I'll probably be more OK with things moving forward. This particular release, however, was a big surprise — and I'm not sure whether it was good or bad.
It seems that is how the game is going now, but before the sister showed up and originally it was just the MC only. Now it might be going the way you think. As far as what Alex says, yes it would have been better in the long run.
If it was mentioned sooner that it was going to take that turn, then it wouldn't have been a surprise that it happened. I don't normally mind playing games that have female protag, this one just kind of threw me off a bit, maybe it was the way it was implemented, like a "Here I come to wreck the day and have sex with everyone you care about" not sure though. LOL.
- Aug 2, 2019
- 1,182
- 1,802
And dont forget jump Kylie the girl the MC is in love with and willing to die for instead of hurting her. For me that was the straw that broke the camels back.
- Jun 10, 2017
- 10,145
- 14,830
Yeah, I understand. And in top of that, it's a character introduced late in the story. If she was here from the start, it would have perhaps be easier to deal with the change.
To be honest, it looked a little like this at first. But to be completely honest, it's surely due to the two other answers before yours, that placed me on the wrong set of mind.
Anyway, like I said, it was "at first", it didn't stay long.
I think that it's more a due to the skill of the writer than anything else. But once again, I perhaps have played to much games and indulge a little to much when the writing is average.
Honestly I don't know for sure ; after all I'm just a player like everyone else, and as far as I know I can't read dev's mind
It's either to help with the girls, or to help against the witch ; perhaps both. For me, it feel more logical that the girls stop going this far once the power isn't here anymore, unless they are corrupted... let's say "from both side". But it's "for me"...
Good because the main plot really advanced, and bad because it also ended in a dead end since the witch have her book back. Good because there's now a real antagonist, and bad because there were so few content.
- May 29, 2018
- 5,767
- 13,704
So when can we kill the sister? She got it coming.
She got it coming.
- Nov 28, 2018
- 1,382
- 753
@anne_O’nymous, it’s fascinating to observe such a heap of projection. You are accusing other people of ranting. You are accusing other people of ranting. You are accusing other people of ranting.
You gave a series of rhetorical, leading, and hostile questions in which you suggested that there’s a deficiency with all of us who do not share your feelings on an issue. Your post was, somewhat accurately, criticized for ”stupidity,” but I think a more accurate term would be “sexual bigotry.” I apologize for the obnoxious thing I’m about to do, in order to demonstrate the form of disingenuous rhetoric you engaged in.
Don’t you realize that questions can make an argument, even a false one? Do you see how questions, when asked from a place of bad faith, can be misleading or aggressive? Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Don’t you feel an emotion I want you to feel, couched in terms that make it sound positive, in order to imply — by intent — that to feel otherwise is a defect?
You’ve also peppered your replies with direct personal attacks.
You gave this dishonest reply to someone else: “You have all right to express your disliking for what the game become, but when I express my liking, I should just have shut the fuck up because I'm not you...” Which is a hostile and deliberate misreading of what had gone before. Others expressed their dislike; you ranted (with misleading questions) and made the point that they were wrong to feel different from you. Now when the (many) people you attacked for not liking something you like have said they have the right to like or dislike what they do, you pretend they attacked you.
Dude: the only person attacking anyone for their preferences on this thread is you.
You have done so repeatedly, and you have falsely claimed to be getting attacked and ranted against when people have come on to defend themselves against your repeated arguments that they have no right to feel what they feel.
Everyone else has been responding to your attacks. No one has come at you unfairly.
You gave a series of rhetorical, leading, and hostile questions in which you suggested that there’s a deficiency with all of us who do not share your feelings on an issue. Your post was, somewhat accurately, criticized for ”stupidity,” but I think a more accurate term would be “sexual bigotry.” I apologize for the obnoxious thing I’m about to do, in order to demonstrate the form of disingenuous rhetoric you engaged in.
Don’t you realize that questions can make an argument, even a false one? Do you see how questions, when asked from a place of bad faith, can be misleading or aggressive? Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Don’t you feel an emotion I want you to feel, couched in terms that make it sound positive, in order to imply — by intent — that to feel otherwise is a defect?
You’ve also peppered your replies with direct personal attacks.
You gave this dishonest reply to someone else: “You have all right to express your disliking for what the game become, but when I express my liking, I should just have shut the fuck up because I'm not you...” Which is a hostile and deliberate misreading of what had gone before. Others expressed their dislike; you ranted (with misleading questions) and made the point that they were wrong to feel different from you. Now when the (many) people you attacked for not liking something you like have said they have the right to like or dislike what they do, you pretend they attacked you.
Dude: the only person attacking anyone for their preferences on this thread is you.
You have done so repeatedly, and you have falsely claimed to be getting attacked and ranted against when people have come on to defend themselves against your repeated arguments that they have no right to feel what they feel.
Everyone else has been responding to your attacks. No one has come at you unfairly.
- Jun 10, 2017
- 10,145
- 14,830
And obviously, the problem can't be your reading...
If effectively I attacked "(many) people", and apparently did it on purpose because they didn't share my point of view, why did we had, one of them and me, an interesting and peaceful exchange ?
- Jan 24, 2018
- 972
- 3,393
This game started as one thing and seems to be ending as something different altogether. If this brother sister women sharing was always planned then you really shouldve introduced the sister right away when the game started. The way she pops out of nowhere and do all this stuff can be unpleasant to some people.
And for a game that has "The game evolves around your choices" in overview there really aren't many choices in second half of it.
And for a game that has "The game evolves around your choices" in overview there really aren't many choices in second half of it.
- Jan 26, 2018
- 1,195
- 1,699
- Nov 20, 2018
- 10,972
- 15,855
Why do a lot of people assume that incest means mother-son when there's a male protagonist? Maybe there should be different kinds of more specific incest tags?
- Feb 11, 2018
- 1,325
- 2,307
This is not a complaint or an indorsment just an opinion.
You say the sister was planned from the start and they were always ment to share the girls, I won't argue with that it may be so but then if it is so you really shouldn't of introduced the game on OP as so" You are a young man living alone in the city with no job, and you decide to take a turn on your life. The game evolves around your choices, which depending on them, will give you different scenes, outcomes, possibilities with the girls of the story. "
There is no hint or indication in that introduction of a possible female protag let alone his sister.
thats if you even plan to make her a mc with choices.
I like many I suspect read that description before considering if to download and try a game or not even before looking at tags.
I suspect not can't be 100% sure but female Protag wasn't in the tags till the introduction of the sister anyway.
By which time a lot of players will be some what invested for want of a better word with a male MC.
So its not so suprising that some players have had the reaction they have to the sudden apearance of one/her.
However as we sofar don't control any desisions involving her I would argue she is not a Protag/MC but just another character in the MC's game admitedly one we get to watch away from the MC but still just a character in his life.
I don't really like playing mutiple MC's in a game I can't sympathise with more than one MC at a time sorry but that just me.
And I won't play the female MC because the choice's are always the same no point picking an option to avoid getting fucked even if there is one because then its not a sex game.
So you always pick the option that gets her fucked and the only diffrence is in the choice's of how she gets fucked and by who she gets fuck and by how many she is fucked and if it was or wasn't her choice to get fucked. <------ (female protag game in a nutshell).
I still like this game and will hopefully continue to storrys interesting the English is more than passible.
the only puzzle I have is how'd the witch get the f-kin book lol.
Just Sayin
You say the sister was planned from the start and they were always ment to share the girls, I won't argue with that it may be so but then if it is so you really shouldn't of introduced the game on OP as so" You are a young man living alone in the city with no job, and you decide to take a turn on your life. The game evolves around your choices, which depending on them, will give you different scenes, outcomes, possibilities with the girls of the story. "
There is no hint or indication in that introduction of a possible female protag let alone his sister.
thats if you even plan to make her a mc with choices.
I like many I suspect read that description before considering if to download and try a game or not even before looking at tags.
I suspect not can't be 100% sure but female Protag wasn't in the tags till the introduction of the sister anyway.
By which time a lot of players will be some what invested for want of a better word with a male MC.
So its not so suprising that some players have had the reaction they have to the sudden apearance of one/her.
However as we sofar don't control any desisions involving her I would argue she is not a Protag/MC but just another character in the MC's game admitedly one we get to watch away from the MC but still just a character in his life.
I don't really like playing mutiple MC's in a game I can't sympathise with more than one MC at a time sorry but that just me.
And I won't play the female MC because the choice's are always the same no point picking an option to avoid getting fucked even if there is one because then its not a sex game.
So you always pick the option that gets her fucked and the only diffrence is in the choice's of how she gets fucked and by who she gets fuck and by how many she is fucked and if it was or wasn't her choice to get fucked. <------ (female protag game in a nutshell).
I still like this game and will hopefully continue to storrys interesting the English is more than passible.
the only puzzle I have is how'd the witch get the f-kin book lol.
Just Sayin
- Apr 30, 2017
- 46
- 54
Amen to that! The game from its beginning had some potential to be a good game. Nowadays the game is not worth of downloading because you wait two months plus for an update and in the end you´ll get five minutes content with some sex scenes with no emotions and dull script as a cherry on the top.
Mathew joe
Haven't played it in a bit but my guess would be that it's there because of the mother/daughter that lives in the apartment complex who is also his landlord.
Haven't played it in a bit but my guess would be that it's there because of the mother/daughter that lives in the apartment complex who is also his landlord.
- Nov 20, 2018
- 10,972
- 15,855
Later into the game, the MC's sister, Alex, visits. After explaining the curse, the MC also mentions that if he sleeps with someone with whom he's in love (i.e., Kylie), she'll die so the witch can be reborn. To help prevent that, Alex sleeps with him to help him eliminate some of his lust.