Ranger
dunno if this has been reported before but on sexscene (scrshot attached) chars skins are bad quality like there were something liquid on them.
I think it has something to do with the rooms' lighting. I generally add similar lighting set to all scenes but some of the rooms have their own 'built-in' lights which makes the models look washed up and also kind-of messes up the render. I don't want to go in too much details, but in DAZ you have a few ways to control render timing - limit by achieved render quality, by number of render iterrations and limit by time spent on rendering. In some of the rooms the renders take much more time (and render passes) to get to good quality.
A couple of years ago you may have noticed a 'grainy' look on some of the images in the games. This was caused by the render hitting the 'iterations' limit before reaching the desired quality. With the RTX cards nVidia introduced DLSS which is like an AI assisted 'de-noise' that got rid of that 'grainy' look with some trade off for quality. It works amazingly on 'architectural' surfaces but not so good on skin (I guess it was trained with more architectural images than pictures of humans). Still, it's the only way you can have manageable render times for animations. What I do is set the render limit to like 200 iterrations and go with that. This produces an animation that is 2 seconds long for 3.5-4 hours on my machine, so when you add posing time, downtime between renders, etc. it makes a scene which has 6 animations with 5-6 POV angles each to be produced in roughly a week.
For some rooms/lighting 200 passes gets the quality to about 30% which is more than enough for the AI to kick in and produce a decent image (keep in mind that those images will later be encoded in an animation, so quality will be lost anyway). Unfortunately for other rooms and lighting sets 200 passes is enough for just 3-4% quality and the AI performs worse. To achieve the same quality that is there for other animations, I'll have to dedicate much more than a week of time for a single scene and I can't afford to do that if I want to have a release every month.
What I'm trying to say is that it's not like I intentionally go and fuck up the quality for some of the animations. It's a technical limitation on the render / environment lighing. I try to take a mental note which rooms to avoid to have a scene in when I write the script, but sometimes it either has to be there, or I forget that it was a shitty place to do a scene. With the proces that I'm following the script and dialogue is done before the renders, so it's a bit too late to change it once the first animation has been posed and rendered and I realize I shouldn't have done it there because this means re-writing the script, changing the dialogue, changing the story-related renders, etc.
I'm attaching a frame from one of today's animations. It has the same rendering settings as the one that you attached (although yours has been compressed further by the video encoding), but the difference in the quality due to the location being different is quite visible as you can see:
