- Nov 24, 2018
- 1,061
- 5,228
What you're seeing is the financial incentive to continue doing updates forever. It's the same driver that brings us large numbers of sequels and remakes in Hollywood. Something brand new might do well, or it might not. But you're really likely to get a sizable percentage of your first movie's audience if you make a sequel. And by the time you're at the 6th sequel, you're pretty much guaranteed to get the entirety of the audience you had for the 4th installment. (Who goes to the first 5 and then stops?)New update of City of Broken Dreamers and... oh, how it pains me to write this, but if I were in charge of this thread, I'd be seriously considering removing the game from the list. It wouldn't be fair, though, but still... so much wasted potential, so much disappointment. I basically agree with all that ename144 said here, and dropped my two cents in here. Any thoughts?
In the 80's, before Science Fiction was mainstream, there was a reason why many of the good science fiction movies starred Arnold Schwarzenegger. It was because people went to see Arnold movies, regardless of what they were about. So, with the guarantee of revenue, the studios were able to do "risky" things like Total Recall and Running Man.
I don't know Philly Games' financial situation, but I certainly understand the pressure he's under.
Tlaero