If you have so much time and energy to write long texts explaining how things should be done on other's people work, I suggest putting all this availability into your own project. It will be much more fruitful.
My own project is fine. It's also not relevant to providing you feedback on how to improve your writing. For someone who claims to be confident about his project, you sure get defensive about criticism.
I have a vision for this series, both how should be made and the story, and no amount of feedback will change that.
The making of a good writer is to be willing to make compromises for the sake of telling a fluid, coherent story. If a majority of people say your process is bad (as they have), then it's not those people trying to trample on your vision. It's people who see potential telling you that you need to work on your writing. You want to keep producing sub-par quality content, cool. Personally, as a writer myself, I would
hate to have someone come to me and say "hey, man, your story has potential, but the quality of writing is really not up to snuff."
Then again, maybe the difference is pride in my work, and you lacking any in yours.
People who share the vision will gather and people who don't will not.
I'm here only to answer questions from the community, because I know that when they can't support us, they gather here.
Have a great day.
I'll preface this with noting that I hate the concept of "broader audience appeal." I think it's a cheap tagline by out-of-touch execs who have no actual investment in the media they're trying to sell. It only works if the people selling the product understand both the entrenched base that already exists, and how to respect that group while also seeking to bring more people into the fold. It's a tricky tightrope, so I have my qualms about the concept itself.
That said...
As a writer and someone who has multiple hobbies, I can't think of a more self-destructive phrase than "I only care about those who agree with me." You couldn't have said it more transparently than if you had typed out those exact words. You're the next Eromancer, bud. Over 3 years with little progress, and you started a second project with ambiguous intent. If you had been working with 3D renders rather than anime cg, I would have called you out on being the guy himself.
You're not coming here to do anything except satisfy your own ego and punch down at the critics. That's it. If you legitimately wanted to improve, wanted to receive real feedback, and sought to truly make the "pitiful poor" people feel acknowledged, neither you nor I would be investing any time in this specific discourse. You'd be ignoring the people who offer praise and ask the most obvious, low-effort questions. But, we both know you're only here to have your ego stroked. A shame, because as I've said several times already, your story has potential.
If my absence and the fact that I am only
now replying hasn't indicated as much, let me spell it out. I have a life outside these forums. Providing you criticism to help you improve your writing is neither a lengthy venture nor too great a distraction from my current day-to-day. What I am attempting to offer is a carefully crafted bit of suggestions and insights to help you improve your writing and tell a more engaging story. You have not only refused to consider what the critics have said, but also shown contempt to anyone who doesn't immediately lay praise on you. Hell, you admitted that you went out of your way to harass someone who criticized your writing in a review.
At this point, I know it's worthless for anyone to send any kind of feedback that isn't blatant sycophancy your way. You're not here for anything but to have your ego stroked, and I see no value for myself or anyone who strives for quality in their content to engage you. You can reply if you want. I might feel inclined to read it, or not. But, as far as further discourse, you'll receive none.
Good luck, Eromancer Jr.
