VN Ren'Py Summer Heat [v0.6.1] [Naughty Fox Games]

4.50 star(s) 379 Votes
Discussion Reviews (379)
B

Beloria2766

Newbie
Oct 1, 2025
33
71
28
Wonder Wolf said:
View attachment 5331004

Status Update #55


Hello everyone!

This week we continued with polishing, editing and clicking pixels.

We ended up dismantling a branching scene with several paths. It felt fun in the scripting phase, but it's a branch that limits playthroughs unnecessarily with needless options. In some ways sure these are great since they offer replayability, but sometimes players might not even realize other paths or content even exists. Or they just play once. So, we decided to make it more straightforward without cutting content or being punishing with the unlockable content later on.

Along with editing and proofing, we also worked on the laptop UI and content. And before you think "Oh great, they are working on extra shit again," this is the first update with the laptop in it. It has a lot of moving parts which could potentially throw issues, and we don't want it to be a buggy mess in the future. Or worse, ugly. Besides, it's also very relevant to the plot.

For example, here's a random news article snippet featuring one of Rosewood's many founders:

View attachment 5331002

There are many locations in Rosewood named after the prestigious Mr. Gooner, such as Gooner Lake, which will be explored in the future. Just a little bit of world building in the background. There's plenty more, but it's of course skippable/missable for the fellows who only play for lewds.

And on the topic of lewds, this week was a pretty good one when it came to editing one of the scenes. We added new renders to show some extra angles that may be of interest, and optimized the animation quality for that scene as well. Overall, feeling good about it. Looking forward to having this scene out for everyone to play.

View attachment 5331003

Cheers,

Robison & Npx
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: nintendo9899, dapothegreat and Surfup64
DaFinker

DaFinker

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2024
1,142
2,178
341
Will need to do body comparisons to see how bad the reusage is, but after getting to Chapter 5 and having seen up close facial expressions from Bree, Sophie and, now, Jenni, it very much appears that they are the same model but with different hair and skin-tones. Their smiles and general facial features remind me of the actress Hilarie Burton. Extremely cute, but a little disconcerting.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: Redtheman, DBongus and Discrepancy
Leilin1949

Leilin1949

Newbie
Jan 15, 2022
52
112
90
Wonder Wolf said:
View attachment 5331004

Status Update #55


Hello everyone!

This week we continued with polishing, editing and clicking pixels.

We ended up dismantling a branching scene with several paths. It felt fun in the scripting phase, but it's a branch that limits playthroughs unnecessarily with needless options. In some ways sure these are great since they offer replayability, but sometimes players might not even realize other paths or content even exists. Or they just play once. So, we decided to make it more straightforward without cutting content or being punishing with the unlockable content later on.

Along with editing and proofing, we also worked on the laptop UI and content. And before you think "Oh great, they are working on extra shit again," this is the first update with the laptop in it. It has a lot of moving parts which could potentially throw issues, and we don't want it to be a buggy mess in the future. Or worse, ugly. Besides, it's also very relevant to the plot.

For example, here's a random news article snippet featuring one of Rosewood's many founders:

View attachment 5331002

There are many locations in Rosewood named after the prestigious Mr. Gooner, such as Gooner Lake, which will be explored in the future. Just a little bit of world building in the background. There's plenty more, but it's of course skippable/missable for the fellows who only play for lewds.

And on the topic of lewds, this week was a pretty good one when it came to editing one of the scenes. We added new renders to show some extra angles that may be of interest, and optimized the animation quality for that scene as well. Overall, feeling good about it. Looking forward to having this scene out for everyone to play.

View attachment 5331003

Cheers,

Robison & Npx
Click to expand...
"We added new renders to show some extra angles that may be of interest, and optimized the animation quality for that scene as well."
This is just that classic, never-gets-old scene, isn't it? That's exactly what everyone wants to see!
good-job.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hawk784563
Surfup64

Surfup64

Newbie
Jul 18, 2024
25
65
91
Sony676 said:
There are two scenes with minor characters. One VERY short (definitely would've needed more animations). The other one a little longer but still quite short as well.
Click to expand...
I know last year (I was a Patreon) the devs have apologized because a lot of backers were upset with the lack of scenes.
Hopefully this time there will be more "sexual" encounters and not just "lewd" like the devs name it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArtemisLambert
Jehuty206

Jehuty206

Member
Jun 20, 2020
416
602
278
Wonder Wolf said:
View attachment 5331004

Status Update #55


Hello everyone!

This week we continued with polishing, editing and clicking pixels.

We ended up dismantling a branching scene with several paths. It felt fun in the scripting phase, but it's a branch that limits playthroughs unnecessarily with needless options. In some ways sure these are great since they offer replayability, but sometimes players might not even realize other paths or content even exists. Or they just play once. So, we decided to make it more straightforward without cutting content or being punishing with the unlockable content later on.

Along with editing and proofing, we also worked on the laptop UI and content. And before you think "Oh great, they are working on extra shit again," this is the first update with the laptop in it. It has a lot of moving parts which could potentially throw issues, and we don't want it to be a buggy mess in the future. Or worse, ugly. Besides, it's also very relevant to the plot.

For example, here's a random news article snippet featuring one of Rosewood's many founders:

View attachment 5331002

There are many locations in Rosewood named after the prestigious Mr. Gooner, such as Gooner Lake, which will be explored in the future. Just a little bit of world building in the background. There's plenty more, but it's of course skippable/missable for the fellows who only play for lewds.

And on the topic of lewds, this week was a pretty good one when it came to editing one of the scenes. We added new renders to show some extra angles that may be of interest, and optimized the animation quality for that scene as well. Overall, feeling good about it. Looking forward to having this scene out for everyone to play.

View attachment 5331003

Cheers,

Robison & Npx
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: laizin, Mykel19, xortor and 6 others
Meabe37

Meabe37

Active Member
Mar 9, 2023
561
2,742
366
Sony676 said:
There are two scenes with minor characters. One VERY short (definitely would've needed more animations). The other one a little longer but still quite short as well.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure i would call them "minor" characters but thy are indeed not MG.

That being said are you not forgetting someone here? A MG with hispanic heritage who love pink and chocolate bars a bit to much ?:LOL:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redtheman and Discrepancy
Sony676

Sony676

Well-Known Member
Mar 14, 2021
1,889
4,038
387
Meabe37 said:
I'm not sure i would call them "minor" characters but thy are indeed not MG.

That being said are you not forgetting someone here? A MG with hispanic heritage who love pink and chocolate bars a bit to much ?:LOL:
Click to expand...
Am I missing something here? There are still “only” two scenes with penetration overall (Cassandra & Jenni), right? Or what exactly are you getting at?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
4.50 star(s) 379 Votes