I understand the point you are making regarding my SG post, but in this case - I felt the need to respond with a different perspective.
We have many visitors who come to this thread, and they are likely to interact very little if at all on the thread, for whatever reason.
I chose to respond far less to the poster of those comments and more to the comments themselves.
I offered a counterpoint to those comments and did so in an adult fashion (regardless of how his subsequent response labeled it).
I have no need to respond to his subsequent posts because my post laid out the points I intended to make re: SG.
There are others who responded along some of the same lines that I did and that also helps to make the point for those visitors who may not be well-versed in SG.
We will always have a certain level of entitlement on F95 - it is the nature of someplace where one can enjoy a creator's work for free, which sometimes has the effect of diminishing the value of the creator's work in some people's eyes or creating a false sense of entitlement.
This was a time where I decided to address the entitlement to sex with LI's, which ignores Ocean's own statements about world-building, when sex with the LI's actually fits the story, his intent to get on Steam and reach a broad audience, etc.
We'll have some posters come back and disagree with the creator's decision on how best to manage his AVN (like when sex with LIs occurs) and question his business decisions, like the work, and timing of that work, to get on Steam.
Providing perspective now that Ocean has deleted his account is up to those of us who both enjoy his creations and choose to take the time to respond (when we feel a response is justified).
I think here we just found ourselves on different sides of - 'is a response justified.'
Cheers!!