Create and Fuck your AI Cum Slut –70% OFF
x
Jun 1, 2017
182
1,205
153
Oh, really? Damn youre so smart!

So which data are you (or the original poster) basing this opinion on? The same could be said about avns in general (no matter if on steam or not) yet SG seems to do reasonably well so far and thats even despite all the questionable dev decisions and all the hate and badmouthing it receives.

Its just a assumption (which he and maybe you) probably would like to be true. And steam is a plattform with 99,999% of content without any kind of sex, so to say steam users specifically need sex in their avns sounds rather stupid and not logical, imo its reasonable that patreon users (and way more likely pirates ...) are the one with these expectations overall.

My assumption is the average steam user gives way less of a fuck about explicit sex scenes than any other kind of avn reader.

Apparently SG made 200k+ on steam which imo is pretty good for just one (sexless) season

And thats not even about my opinion, imo this avn should get lewd scenes soon but i dont base reality on my opinions and what i want like a toddler.

Not to mention that buying avns on steam in the first place is kinda .... whatever.

Maybe try to consider the implications of a comment before you try to be all high and mighty and condescending in such a yuck way lol
i myself don't have any hard "data" but the real issue, and what likely matters to people, particularly patrons with early access to when it existed, isn't "it doesn't have the *real* adult content", it's "the real adult content was removed to suit a wider audience/steam". the nami scene where she was supposed to grind mc to try to help his ed is a big one, it would be fully in character, and the hot tub would have been the moment in the story to attempt it, and it's doubly notable because bella is still down *bad* in her scenes around the same time, and tries smashing mc into the car to get it to work, grinding him multiple times etc. honestly the extent dev pushes it with several characters seems like it's nothing but hurting his own project to explicitly only allow direct sexual content by s2, because if anyone was iffy about adult content, or checking for rule breaks, sg already fails. he removed it/limited it, so at best it can make long term patrons iffy, at worst an amount leave to something else and new players have less "come for the snu snu, stay for the mental issues and crying" >we're here.

steam is not a platform without "99.9" sexual content unless you just play fps of the month all day. check new releases commonly and it's the other way around, or at least 50/50. avn also stands for adult visual novel, do you understand you can't have an adult all ages visual novel? you don't specifically need targets in a fps either i guess, just holding a gun and firing it. pirating doesn't invalidate opinions, and uh, yeah obviously people who set up a payment plan for sg for possibly years then find out he's rewriting the game for potential steam bucks would have an issue.

no, the average steam user gives as much of an opinion on adult content as anyone else. sir, have you never noticed the people upset about censorship? not liking censorship is the rule, whether it's realistic depictions of violence or sexual content, if you pay upwards of 80 now, you don't want "the western ver" or "the steam ver" you want the full game. if there was originally clapping cheeks people want cheek action, especially since a., it's 90% of the time never replaced with an equal amount of content, and b., you stand against it or they'll just remove more in the future, or something you'd actually start caring about.

it made 200k but could have made more. realistically it has only one single competitor, is widely recommended as the alternative, and he self sabotaged multiple times.
 

Krytax123

Engaged Member
Dec 29, 2022
3,476
7,679
628
i myself don't have any hard "data" but the real issue, and what likely matters to people, particularly patrons with early access to when it existed, isn't "it doesn't have the *real* adult content", it's "the real adult content was removed to suit a wider audience/steam". the nami scene where she was supposed to grind mc to try to help his ed is a big one, it would be fully in character, and the hot tub would have been the moment in the story to attempt it, and it's doubly notable because bella is still down *bad* in her scenes around the same time, and tries smashing mc into the car to get it to work, grinding him multiple times etc. honestly the extent dev pushes it with several characters seems like it's nothing but hurting his own project to explicitly only allow direct sexual content by s2, because if anyone was iffy about adult content, or checking for rule breaks, sg already fails. he removed it/limited it, so at best it can make long term patrons iffy, at worst an amount leave to something else and new players have less "come for the snu snu, stay for the mental issues and crying" >we're here.

steam is not a platform without "99.9" sexual content unless you just play fps of the month all day. check new releases commonly and it's the other way around, or at least 50/50. avn also stands for adult visual novel, do you understand you can't have an adult all ages visual novel? you don't specifically need targets in a fps either i guess, just holding a gun and firing it. pirating doesn't invalidate opinions, and uh, yeah obviously people who set up a payment plan for sg for possibly years then find out he's rewriting the game for potential steam bucks would have an issue.

no, the average steam user gives as much of an opinion on adult content as anyone else. sir, have you never noticed the people upset about censorship? not liking censorship is the rule, whether it's realistic depictions of violence or sexual content, if you pay upwards of 80 now, you don't want "the western ver" or "the steam ver" you want the full game. if there was originally clapping cheeks people want cheek action, especially since a., it's 90% of the time never replaced with an equal amount of content, and b., you stand against it or they'll just remove more in the future, or something you'd actually start caring about.

it made 200k but could have made more. realistically it has only one single competitor, is widely recommended as the alternative, and he self sabotaged multiple times.
Look a post full of assumptions based on feeligns again without any kind of data to prove shit again.

To me this all sounds like "I am pissed that the nami grinding scene got removed" but instead of just saying that, youre projecting it on all "long term patreons" lol

I mean maybe youre right and lots of long term patreons left because of the removal of this scene and the removal of nika's dick being shown but the patreon chart didnt look like it so im not sure why you think thats the case (other than being just your opinion).

Patreon subs are often WAAAAY more understanding and less demanding than the pirates here in my experience (and sometimes to a stupid degree). I personally always considered the nami grinding scene as somewhat stupid and out of place but whatever.

Im gonna ingore your whole rant about how ocean trying to get s1 as a fsk16 version and how thats supposedly related to censorship blablabla while age restrictions always existed in movies and games. This is not related to the censorship-wave at the moment but to be able to sell his product to a wider audience and his home country.

This was obviously a bad decision from the dev and didnt went as he intended but it still doesnt look like that all the supporters left beacuse of it no matter how much you would like that lol

Steam is in your opinion a plattform with 50% of the games there having sexual content ... ? Really now? Come on ...

Surely it could have done more money, but it could have made easily less, every AVN could be more successful with less dev errors, whats that supposed to say?

And how the fuck does it only have one competitor? The competitor youre probably thinking about isnt even the most succesful avn on steam

Not to mention that steam-success in the first is in no way any indication that an avn is any good anyway, otherwise every avn-dev should apparently base his road to success on ... fre$hwomen ... which simply is a total shit avn but very successful.
 

SToyS

Member
May 8, 2025
130
246
62
it made 200k but could have made more. realistically it has only one single competitor, is widely recommended as the alternative, and he self sabotaged multiple times.
Don't waste your time, he won't listen to you anyway. Just ask him an awkward question... For example, SG used to be considered BAD's main competitor. The only difference between these games was that SG had censorship and BAD didn't, and SG also had better graphics. Now let him compare the earnings of these two games on Steam.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.


Patreon subs are often WAAAAY more understanding and less demanding than the pirates here in my experience (and sometimes to a stupid degree).
As a former Ocean's subscriber, I can tell you that it's immediately obvious that you're writing complete nonsense. You're obviously still young and supported by your parents, so you don't value money. Anyone who provides for themselves has complete control over their finances. And such people wouldn't invest in failed projects. Only an idiot would give money to a failed project and ask for nothing in return.
 

SToyS

Member
May 8, 2025
130
246
62
It never was. The other game you mention is litteraly the GTA of the genre. SG has never come close both in term of popularity and pledges.
Wasn't NLT the dominant force in the genre? Only with time was the DPC able to catch up with him. Moreover, at the beginning of its development, BaD was not as popular as it is now; however, like any other game, success comes with time.
 

Perfect S

Member
Oct 20, 2019
129
726
168
Patreon subs are often WAAAAY more understanding and less demanding than the pirates here in my experience (and sometimes to a stupid degree). I personally always considered the nami grinding scene as somewhat stupid and out of place but whatever.
I find it funny that most people who looks down on "F95 pirates" often using it as some kind of pejorative term are the ones with the highest post counts by far.
 

Krytax123

Engaged Member
Dec 29, 2022
3,476
7,679
628
As a former Ocean's subscriber, I can tell you that it's immediately obvious that you're writing complete nonsense. You're obviously still young and supported by your parents, so you don't value money. Anyone who provides for themselves has complete control over their finances. And such people wouldn't invest in failed projects. Only an idiot would give money to a failed project and ask for nothing in return.
Youre just lacking a brain bro, everything about your assumptions is unsurprisingly wrong and furthermore shows that youre rather simple minded. The only guys i ever see use the "youre probably a kid" agrument are kids themselfs by the way, nobody else gives a fuck about this stuff.

And what the everyloving fuck are you talking about again, youre so incredibly clueless, SG was never on par with the competitor you mentioned and im a sub for 8 avn's at the moment (not sg) and am for years, while you very obviously have no clue about patreons and their (at times overly stupid) loyality.

There are quite a few avn devs whore are not even communicating with their patreons for 1+ years or even completly ghosting everyone and STILL make good money. You could serve lots of patreons pure shit and they would still thank you for it and ask for more. There are ENDLESS people on patreon who 1) keep investing in failed projects and 2) dont consider projects failed.

Seeing what kind of nonsense youre writing makes me pretty sure you never have been a sub anywhere on patreon, im done discussing with you, youre living in delulu land and nothing you wrote is anywhere close to reality lol

Perfect S I never said anything bad about being a pirate, i just said lots of pirates are behaving like overly entitled demanding little bitches. You cant seriously disagree with that, just look at every thread involving a harem and all the demands and no-go's of the players lol

Im a pirate myself tho
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: hawk784563

Ray_D

Forum Fanatic
Nov 13, 2022
5,444
18,656
812
It never was. The other game you mention is litteraly the GTA of the genre. SG has never come close both in term of popularity and pledges.
I wouldn't call BAD, the equivalent of GTA in AVN, but it's definitely the poster boy when it comes to AVN.
 
Last edited:

SToyS

Member
May 8, 2025
130
246
62
Youre just lacking a brain bro, everything about your assumptions is unsurprisingly wrong and furthermore shows that youre rather simple minded. The only guys i ever see use the "youre probably a kid" agrument are kids themselfs by the way, nobody else gives a fuck about this stuff.

And what the everyloving fuck are you talking about again, youre so incredibly clueless, SG was never on par with the competitor you mentioned and im a sub for 8 avn's at the moment (not sg) and am for years, while you very obviously have no clue about patreons and their (at times overly stupid) loyality.
You're on fire bro, this will help you.
1231.jpg
 

Den1mo

Member
Aug 26, 2023
234
1,681
276
For example, SG used to be considered BAD's main competitor
if anyone really think that they should wake up from their wet dream :ROFLMAO: this game sell less on steam than any other average avn that never had even half the support SG did. so what competition?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
4.30 star(s) 571 Votes