It's donations though. DC never asked for anything and could possibly still be making the game even if you sliced more than 1/2 of what people give him monthly.The fact that the game is free isn't really terribly relevant to the point you were responding to. The source of their income for this game is completely independent to the number of copies of the game that get downloaded. They are receiving a monthly sum regardless of how often they release. Hence the concept that artificially stretching out development times would certainly be milking their patrons (whether they are actually artificially delaying or not is another matter)
if she gets a spot in the barn she's going to get milked harder than dc's patreon subscribersLooking forward to fucking the shit out of Veronica
What does being free to download have anything to do with devs drawing out development to prolong the monthly income they make from patreon? You need to work on your reading comprehension skills.Your response has no logic or basis in reality. The game is FREE to anyone - from the developer's website, where you can download it ... for FREE.
I understand English may not be your native language - but FREE is only a four-letter word.
lol I hope that will be the caseif she gets a spot in the barn she's going to get milked harder than dc's patreon subscribers
Getting donations made by people who enjoy giving ~3$ a month to say "thank you for what you do" means DC is a scamlord hellbent on delaying the complete recoding of the game while also adding and reformatting everything to 16:9, made by 1 dude who works part time ..... Yep, complete and utter milkage. Good to know you didn't try your own advice 1st and learn wtf you're talking aboutWhat does being free to download have anything to do with devs drawing out development to prolong the monthly income they make from patreon? You need to work on your reading comprehension skills.
A search for the word "patch" with the results sorted in order of date brings up a post that is listed the third (now fourth with this one added) on the first page of the results (also, 14th (now 15th) result on the first page shows same question you're asking - going there, one of the next 2 posts below it gives you the answer)Before I download one, anyone know which is the more recommended version of the Incest Patch? the 20.5 on Lewdpatcher or the 20.12 one found in these comments? I Dunno if it's already been answered but I am NOT patienct enough to search through over a thousand pages of comments trying to find an answer.
Sweet irony is just as good as milker tearsA search for the word "patch" with the results sorted in order of date brings up a post that is listed the third (now fourth with this one added) on the first page of the results (also, 14th (now 15th) result on the first page shows same question you're asking - going there, one of the next 2 posts below it gives you the answer)
A search for the word "incest" shows similar - with the two I referenced in nearly the same position. So does "20.5" and "20.12"
Mainly because I post the FAQ I created about every other page because people don't have the patience to use the search box in the upper right hand corner of any page. Just think, if you'd done that - you'd have had the answer 14 minutes ago, but you didn't have the patience. But you did have the patience to wait for the answer.
Sure, but milking isn't necessarily about need is it? In fact it's usually associated with greed. Whether or not the team necessarily needs the money they are making on donations doesn't really have much bearing on whether greed and/or laziness is driving them to artificially slow development. It makes a strong case that the game wasn't conceived to be milked from the get-go, but the fact that the development has slowed down drastically from when it used to be 1 decent sized update every couple months to only mini content fillers every 6 months for the past year and a half is a change that could feasibly be seen as a change in the attitude of the developer.It's donations though. DC never asked for anything and could possibly still be making the game even if you sliced more than 1/2 of what people give him monthly.
It's filler updates every 4 months though ..... And the "normal" updates are also ~4 months each. The only delay you can cry on is not getting the 16:9 new backgrounds and the code rehaul, everything else is bonus you get to pass the time and have something to do, as promised. Whether or not getting ~20 scenes in a year can be considered milking is up to you, be aware most people can and will laugh at you thoughSure, but milking isn't necessarily about need is it? In fact it's usually associated with greed. Whether or not the team necessarily needs the money they are making on donations doesn't really have much bearing on whether greed and/or laziness is driving them to artificially slow development. It makes a strong case that the game wasn't conceived to be milked from the get-go, but the fact that the development has slowed down drastically from when it used to be 1 decent sized update every couple months to only mini content fillers every 6 months for the past year and a half is a change that could feasibly be seen as a change in the attitude of the developer.
Again, I'm not asserting that they are... but the point is, nothing you (or the poster I initially responded to) brought up makes any kind of relevant argument against an assertion that they may have changed tack and have been intentionally milking their patreon for the last year or longer.
For the first couple of years the updates were coming once every 1 or 2 months. version 0.02 dropped in August '16, version 0.03 dropped in September '16, 0.08 in November '16 and 0.09 in December '16. A couple of years in the updates started taking longer, several months between a drop (but the content in the updates were bigger so it made sense). While a tech update does conceivably take a long time, the progress tracker hasn't moved out of the upper 60% completion range for almost a year.It's filler updates every 4 months though ..... And the "normal" updates are also ~4 months each. The only delay you can cry on is not getting the 16:9 new backgrounds and the code rehaul, everything else is bonus you get to pass the time and have something to do, as promised. Whether or not getting ~20 scenes in a year can be considered milking is up to you, be aware most people can and will laugh at you though
However, you conveniently don't point out the people aren't providing any relevant evidence when they make the initial argument in favor of the idea that the developer is intentionally slowing. They don't make their case, but instead just whine.I'm just pointing out that a lot of the arguments people have posted against the idea that they might be intentionally slowing development aren't actually providing any relevant evidence to the contrary.
For convenience I had thrown in a few arguments of my own. The progress tracker staying in the upper 60% for a year being the most suggestive. I honestly don't think I've done more than peek at this topic since late 2020, but I'm fairly certain I'm not the first one to bring up how little the progress bar has moved in the last year.However, you conveniently don't point out the people aren't providing any relevant evidence when they make the initial argument in favor of the idea that the developer is intentionally slowing. They don't make their case, but instead just whine.
As with all cases involving complaints, the people making the complaints are the ones who have the burden of proof - not the ones who are attempting to refute the scattered buckshot of personal opinions, hunches, and guesses.
And yes, updates are going to take longer and longer for what seems like enough content for an update to be required as the game continues to get larger and larger in content and storyline. It's a logical progression. The more there is already, the more substantial updates need to "make a difference."
You know there is a chart, you know it has moved slowly, but you don't know what the work is necessary for that bar to move. That isn't evidence, it's just assumptions based upon no actual knowledge - just that an image isn't updating as fast as some would like.For convenience I had thrown in a few arguments of my own. The progress tracker staying in the upper 60% for a year being the most suggestive. I honestly don't think I've done more than peek at this topic since late 2020, but I'm fairly certain I'm not the first one to bring up how little the progress bar has moved in the last year.
Yes it has moved... but again, overall percentage has gone up 4% or 5% in a year when we got to mid 60% in a handful of months. If you imagine that progress goes as slow moving forward for the tech update as it has for this last year (~5% per year), the tech update won't drop until 2028... that's not an exaggeration.You know there is a chart, you know it has moved slowly, but you don't know what the work is necessary for that bar to move. That isn't evidence, it's just assumptions based upon no actual knowledge - just that an image isn't updating as fast as some would like.