Yes it's good to know that you were wrong and have someone to point out your mistake. It happens.Good to know, I suppose?
If by "appropriate amount of nuclear weapons" you mean "amount that's completely infeasible for humanity to achieve" then sure, because even if you combine all the nuclear warheads in the world today and hit them on someone point blank the energy they sustain will still be below that of being 0.1 second in the core of the Sun.Sure, if you ignore the fact that I said appropriate amount of nuclear weapons. As in more than one. And not "a" nuclear bomb. You quoted the part and somehow still wanted to argue, I guess?
If you're gonna completely ignore any practical implication and just want to argue for the sake of arguing you might as well argue "appropriate amount of firecrackers" can kill a A-class, hell you can even argue "appropriate amount of firecrackers" can blow up the universe.
When was it stated?And Nico doesn't send monsters to the core of the sun. She sends them to the middle layers, generally.
Except it was stated that Nico's attack created an explosion many times greater than the largest nuclear detonation in the world, and since we don't know how "large" the "largest nuclear detonation" is and how many the "many time greater" is we have no idea how Nico's attack compared to the stockpiles of nuclear warheads in the setting, so no you cannot argue that.The sustained heat and pressure would be a good counter if Nico didn't use her sun fire attack to vaporize Level 5 Ella's monster body. And unless it was less durable than A Class monsters. You can indeed argue that enough Nuclear weapons can kill A Class monsters.
You can "assume" all you want, as I said you can even "assume" with enough firecrackers you would be able to blow up the universe if that's what you were going with.Assuming, you can get it up to the same level. The keyword that you're likely going to ignore again is "assuming".
Last edited: