Now this update show us why you as a author can't change the past as solution for a creative dead end, because you will end up with a major paradox as plot hole like is happening here.
The problem is, now in Fujino story the effect came before the cause which breaks the plot logical continuity, Asuna now is referring to the affair as if was more than 2/3 years old since SAO when in reality is only 2 months, any new player/reader will think that as the reality and will get lost in the plot.
Like when she says "Inoda have trained her body well in SAO and she can't resist to him" and we know this never happened right... right?
One dialogue in particular caught my eye, when Asuna tell to Liz abouth the affair and more or less said that started at SAO Liz reply to her "SAO, SAO... always SAO for how long you will blame what happened there for what you're doing now" here we have a problem with Liz answer because that should be news for her, but she acted like she already knew that, the logic is broken unless Liz indeed know something from that time about Asuna and Inoda, or both were talking about 2 different things at same time, which inside a story it's very bad for general plot undestanding.
And there is the entire thing about Asuna sexual related PTSD, her body indeed was trained by someone, because according to Fujino own "logic" in this plot the memory manipulation only works if the subject had some real life experience with a similar memory in Asuna's case sexual training.
And Kirito's "quest" with the other girls is like i said before, bland at best, another footjob for fuck sake, one thing though Sinon dialogue about that she heard Inoda having one "impressive talent" and she may will choose him if Kirito keep letting her down, is very suggestive and weird at same time, how Sinon know about Inoda's "sexual performance" and who told that to her, because that wasn't a jab on Kirito over Asuna cheating, just that she's curious about Inoda.