Alright. I'll open all existing commands for testing in 0.2If I could make one suggestion for 0.2, could you add a command in debug mode to add money?
It'd make testing lategame characters a lot easier.
I guess i should clarify:I'm really not a fan of current state of fan mechanic. Since number of guests appears to be limited and it's always same guys, once girl gets a fan, there is nothing left to manage with her (unless you still need to boost obedience, which just makes it worse), since profits from fans can't be beat, and once client becomes fan, he's useless for anything else. Getting multiple fans of same girl makes it even worse, since it guarantees one of your limited clients won't be served, froever (could be caused by girl packs updates, but still, an issue). Plus, while pool of clients seems to increase when you get new girls, there is no guarantee you will get one 'small' enough to get new girls started, making fans being unusable even bigger problem.
In my opinion, at minimum, it should be possible to assign fans to somebody else, even at half the regular price if you have to.
But I would go even futher with ability to switch fan fascination, bigger pool of clients and some kind of rotation for them, or at least ability to kick specific client fom pool and have him replaced by new random one.
I think he meant that a fan can't be assigned to any girl they aren't a fan of.I guess i should clarify:
The autoselection defaults to selecting fan clients to maximize profit.
But you can select any client you want.
Also there is a problem in 0.15 with client being 11 times more likely to become a fan. (Oops again)
It'll also wait until 0.2 as i'm rewriting client generation to be moddable.
I think he meant that a fan can't be assigned to any girl they aren't a fan of.
This threw me off a little.once girl gets a fan, there is nothing left to manage with her
But why would you? There are only 4 factors to consider when matching client to a girl. Profit, farming up obedience , stretching, and whether given client would be better fit with another girl or not. Existing fan will not grow in size and always be most profitable. Since fans can't be used with another girl, only case when you want to match with non-fan is when you can't even select fan in first place due to low obedience. Thus 'there is nothing left to manage with her', since with all orfices unlocked profit is only factor that still matters.The autoselection defaults to selecting fan clients to maximize profit.
But you can select any client you want.
In the base game there is only Link, all other boys have to be added via extra packs.Are the boys purely TRAPS? Or are the some normal boys mixed in?
Basically this: At the moment, I don't think anyone's added much if any male characters, so Link in the base is pretty much the only one, and he's a trap. But no, males added do not have to be purely traps, as a trap is specifically defined as a male (or female) looking close enough to the other gender that someone that's not specifically into homosexual relations might find them attractive. As such, normal gay between two men is possible, you just need the pictures for it.Are the boys purely TRAPS? Or are the some normal boys mixed in?
Corrected typos in features and added to the mod postHey there. I had some free time, so I decided to try and mod three male furry characters in. Unfortunately I have weird ass tastes so the guys I give to you are: the pokemon Mewtwo, Kass thebardbird from Breath of the Wild and... Fizz the fish boi from League of Legends??
Actually I'd have liked to add master Splinter too, to complement April, but I couldn't find enough sub stuff with him, expecially of his 1987 cartoon version.
Anyway here are the mega links:
This one if you want all three characters
Complete Pack
or these ones if you want to get just one or two of them
Mewtwo
Kass
Fizz
Just unzip inside the StreamingAssets folder, where the mainpackage.pacc is.
There is a trap so far, and traps are gay according to mods, so gay tag. EDIT: Traps having sex with men*why the gay tag?
Not trying to start anything, but it bothers me that people are saying it's just because there's a trap. Have you considered it might not be the trap part? Have you thought about the fact that, maybe, it's male on male, regardless of trap status, that makes someone add the gay tag? I don't know the mods very well, so they could very well add gay to anything with a trap, regardless of actual sex involved (Male trap on female is straight, not gay), but in this case, the gay tag is correct.There is a trap so far, and traps are gay according to mods, so gay tag.
Some guys want to say doing a guy who is sufficiently pretty isn't gay so they get mad about the tags.Not trying to start anything, but it bothers me that people are saying it's just because there's a trap. Have you considered it might not be the trap part? Have you thought about the fact that, maybe, it's male on male, regardless of trap status, that makes someone add the gay tag? I don't know the mods very well, so they could very well add gay to anything with a trap, regardless of actual sex involved (Male trap on female is straight, not gay), but in this case, the gay tag is correct.
There's a male character, he's a trap, so he's very feminine, that's not gay.
The male character has a male customer sex him in the butt, that's gay.
Plenty of reason for a gay tag if you ask me, and that's before all the people starting to add their own males.
Not trying to start anything, but it bothers me that people are saying it's just because there's a trap. Have you considered it might not be the trap part? Have you thought about the fact that, maybe, it's male on male, regardless of trap status, that makes someone add the gay tag? I don't know the mods very well, so they could very well add gay to anything with a trap, regardless of actual sex involved (Male trap on female is straight, not gay), but in this case, the gay tag is correct.
There's a male character, he's a trap, so he's very feminine, that's not gay.
The male character has a male customer sex him in the butt, that's gay.
Plenty of reason for a gay tag if you ask me, and that's before all the people starting to add their own males.
Who says this and what the fuk are you going on about????Some guys want to say doing a guy who is sufficiently pretty isn't gay so they get mad about the tags.
Like, I don't want to out anyone against their desires but if you want to fuck a guy and you're a guy... that's gay, no matter how pretty he is.
Not trying to start anything, but it bothers me that people are saying it's just because there's a trap. Have you considered it might not be the trap part? Have you thought about the fact that, maybe, it's male on male, regardless of trap status, that makes someone add the gay tag? I don't know the mods very well, so they could very well add gay to anything with a trap, regardless of actual sex involved (Male trap on female is straight, not gay), but in this case, the gay tag is correct.
There's a male character, he's a trap, so he's very feminine, that's not gay.
The male character has a male customer sex him in the butt, that's gay.
Plenty of reason for a gay tag if you ask me, and that's before all the people starting to add their own males.
People who say "traps aren't gay" unironically are usually referring to their attraction to traps, and why they think being attracted to them doesn't make them gay.Who says this and what the fuk are you going on about????